The article assumes that just because they suck now and we sucked then that they can just easily replicate what we did. It also assumes that it was all Scott Frost that just revolutionized the program and we weren't trending in the right direction before him, pretty sure we won the Fiesta Bowl...
Because UConn is still a name that people have heard for a while, even though they suck in football. Voters are lazy, they hear we beat UConn and we jump four spots, even though the Cincy will be a much better win.
You mean undefeated for two years, then they let you in the club right? No go for three, haha you lost, you suck.
ESPN/CFP cabal - If you did it for three years we would have let you in, there is a path, we love UCF, better luck next time
USC sucked when we beat Stanford, now USC is awesome, I’m sure they’ll rectify it.
When the victory was certain and they showed USC’s schedule I thought showing Stanford at 23 was rich
I agree, talking about the Pitt coach being 1-2 so he’s coming up with tired old slogans for the reporters about “doing the right things to set your self up for wins”. That means you haven’t won enough. You are what your record says you are.