Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe we should lower taxes for the rich so they will decide to earn more?Clearly its more than we want it to be or should be, and i cannot defend where that money went, but 108% debt to income ratio isnt the end of the world either. I'd rather see it at about half that amount. If we can come up with a plan to balance out at this level for the next decade and then begin to chip away at it over a 15-20 year term to get it cut in half then things will be ok.
Spoken like a true dumb drunk uncle.ive said it countless times, we need to drastically reduce the spending.
honestly, i think that if taxes were not auto deducted out of our paychecks people would finally realize how much the gov steals from them.
i guarantee that alone would fix a lot of the problems we have today.
Maybe we should lower taxes for the rich so they will decide to earn more?
you are a pathetic partisan troll and you add nothing to the conversation.Spoken like a true dumb drunk uncle.
I wish I could find a way to contribute like you do Uncle Wayne.you are a pathetic partisan troll and you add nothing to the conversation.
I'm aware of this obviously but there's no evidence that 30 or 50 or 70 percent is the best number. Also in labor economics the more a person makes the less they want to work after an earnings threshold so you can make an economic case that increasing taxes on the ultra rich will raise production.They would earn more directly from lower taxes. Most people even with alittle bit of wealth invest most of it. That grows the economy.
try posting less opinion partisan crap. like how the covington boys were actually the ones being harassed. or how elizabeth warren lied about being an american indian to advance her career. or about how you believe all women unless its a dem involved then suddenly due process is in vogue. or black face gop that has to go until its a dem and then suddenly lets make sure he stays in power.I wish I could find a way to contribute like you do Uncle Wayne.
What reality do you live in Uncle Wayne?try posting less opinion partisan crap. like how the covington boys were actually the ones being harassed. or how elizabeth warren lied about being an american indian to advance her career. or about how you believe all women unless its a dem involved then suddenly due process is in vogue. or black face gop that has to go until its a dem and then suddenly lets make sure he stays in power.
but i know you cant do that because youre a sad pathetic troll who brings nothing to the table.
The funny thing about Art Laffer is that even Keynes would have agreed with him, and literally every bit of data we have on tax rates verifies his supposition. No matter how high or low tax rates are, tax revenue remains predictably static. Thats what makes the whole discussion hilarious: no matter what you do, there is no way to generate more revenue without growth.They would earn more directly from lower taxes. Most people even with alittle bit of wealth invest most of it. That grows the economy.
honestly when it comes to spending both parties are the same. occassionally you get a rep that will vote no against spending more money.certain media figures forgot this existed since 'their team' is now in the White House
you are full of itWhat reality do you live in Uncle Wayne?
- I believe the Virginia accuser and in my limited posts on the topic I supported the Democrat being investigated.
- I never called for old black face photos to be an instant termination for GOP, only established racist behavior like with Steve King and Donald Trump.
- I didn't even post one single time in the Covington Thread
You're such a hillbilly uncle that you have no grasp on reality. You just drunkenly spew out whatever pops in your head even if you just imagined it.
The funny thing about Art Laffer is that even Keynes would have agreed with him, and literally every bit of data we have on tax rates verifies his supposition. No matter how high or low tax rates are, tax revenue remains predictably static. Thats what makes the whole discussion hilarious: no matter what you do, there is no way to generate more revenue without growth.
if taxes on cigarettes were meant to deter people from using them, what does an income tax do? lolRight! And tax rates can stifle growth.
if taxes on cigarettes were meant to deter people from using them, what does an income tax do? lol
Drunk Uncle WayneFW: FW: FW: FW: FW: FW: FW: if taxes on cigarettes were meant to deter people from using them, what does an income tax do? lol
Definitely not on the same level as income taxes. Consumption taxes do effectively deter spending but income taxes have a net zero effect on production on the lowest levels, which is where the vast majority of it happens.if taxes on cigarettes were meant to deter people from using them, what does an income tax do? lol