2018 Pulitzer Prizes

[NinjaKnight]

In a shock to absolutely no one, WaPo nails the Investigative Reporting:

For purposeful and relentless reporting that changed the course of a Senate race in Alabama by revealing a candidate’s alleged past sexual harassment of teenage girls and subsequent efforts to undermine the journalism that exposed it.

(emphasis added)

Now they need to come up with the Anti-Pullitzer and give it to Fox for the absolutely embarrassment to journalism they have exhibited by employing Hannity.

 

[Bob the Citronaut]

Hopefully WaPo can get to the bottom of who allowed Hannity to have a lawyer. That is far worse than uncovering a child molester.

 

[NinjaKnight]

Hopefully WaPo can get to the bottom of who allowed Hannity to have a lawyer. That is far worse than uncovering a child molester.

I'm beginning to think you aren't just pretending to be a moron...if you need me to explain it in simpler terms I'll be happy to, just let me know.

 

[Bob the Citronaut]

I'm beginning to think you aren't just pretending to be a moron...if you need me to explain it in simpler terms I'll be happy to, just let me know.

I've been waiting for you to fill me in on the crimes even worse than Hannity having a lawyer. That's pretty egregious all by itself. I don't see how it can get much worse than that, but it won't be shocking if it is. If he was willing to hire a lawyer, it's pretty obvious there are likely no bounds to his misdeeds.

 

[NinjaKnight]

I've been waiting for you to fill me in on the crimes even worse than Hannity having a lawyer. That's pretty egregious all by itself. I don't see how it can get much worse than that, but it won't be shocking if it is. If he was willing to hire a lawyer, it's pretty obvious there are likely no bounds to his misdeeds.

-Hannity is an employee of Fox News
-Fox News is a "News company" [citation needed]
-Hannity has been a hugely outspoken critic of the Cohen investigation (muh attorney client privilege)
-Hannity has employed Cohen as a personal lawyer...

This is whats known as a "massive fuking ethics violation" Hannity will be fired within 24 hours, Fox "News" will have what little journalistic integrity it has clung to stripped away.

Did you understand this, because all of your replies so far have shown you to be completely and willfully ignorant in the matter. I can dumb it down further if you require.

Please note that if you continue to miss the point, I will assume you are incapable of understanding and I'll dumb it down to a 3rd grade level in hopes that you will comprehend.

 

[Bob the Citronaut]

-Hannity is an employee of Fox News
-Fox News is a "News company" [citation needed]
-Hannity has been a hugely outspoken critic of the Cohen investigation (muh attorney client privilege)
-Hannity has employed Cohen as a personal lawyer...

This is whats known as a "massive fuking ethics violation" Hannity will be fired within 24 hours, Fox "News" will have what little journalistic integrity it has clung to stripped away.

Did you understand this, because all of your replies so far have shown you to be completely and willfully ignorant in the matter. I can dumb it down further if you require.

Please note that if you continue to miss the point, I will assume you are incapable of understanding and I'll dumb it down to a 3rd grade level in hopes that you will comprehend.

THAT'S AWFUL!!! So not only did Hannity hire a lawyer, he also came to his defense when he felt there was a wrongdoing?!?! These people are monsters. Defending people and hiring lawyers is inexcusable. I can't believe we don't have laws to protect us from these atrocities. Constitutional crisis!

 

[NinjaKnight]

THAT'S AWFUL!!! So not only did Hannity hire a lawyer, he also came to his defense when he felt there was a wrongdoing?!?! These people are monsters. Defending people and hiring lawyers is inexcusable. I can't believe we don't have laws to protect us from these atrocities. Constitutional crisis!

Wow, so you really don't understand?

Ethics violation = BAD

Understand yet? Or do I need to simplify it for you further?

 

[UCFBS]

In a shock to absolutely no one, WaPo nails the Investigative Reporting:

For purposeful and relentless reporting that changed the course of a Senate race in Alabama by revealing a candidate’s alleged past sexual harassment of teenage girls and subsequent efforts to undermine the journalism that exposed it.

(emphasis added)

Now they need to come up with the Anti-Pullitzer and give it to Fox for the absolutely embarrassment to journalism they have exhibited by employing Hannity.

Roy Moore was already a credibility nightmare because of his firings. But yes, it was probably that information that caused 75-80% Alabama to go majority Democratic.

The problem with the Republican Party, unlike the Democratic Party, is that it cannot prevent people from getting on the ballot. That's what the Republican Party has always stood for from Day 1, ballot access, in sharp contrast to the Democratic Party.

Hopefully WaPo can get to the bottom of who allowed Hannity to have a lawyer. That is far worse than uncovering a child molester.

Defending Hannity is only one step up from defending Limbaugh. They are both hypocrites at times, and have hurt good people.

There are plenty of them on the Progressive side as well.

 

[knightbeer]

So all bad guys hire a certain lawyer/firm and good guys hire a different group?? Come on guys, the top law firms represent both. The best have scum and poets. Silly to think otherwise.

 

[UCFBS]

So all bad guys hire a certain lawyer/firm and good guys hire a different group?? Come on guys, the top law firms represent both. The best have scum and poets. Silly to think otherwise.

^ Ditto

 

[Bob the Citronaut]