AG Loretta Lynch: Orlando gunman's motive may never be known
So is the attorney general like the government's version of The Onion?
So is the attorney general like the government's version of The Onion?
AG Loretta Lynch: Orlando gunman's motive may never be known
- Thread starter SublimeKnight
- Start date
It's obviously because he's xenophobic homophobic NRA card carrying Republican. That's why he attacked a gay club on Latin night.
Not to change the topic but isn't the attorney general also responsible for the no fly list?
The [redacted] are coming! The [redacted] are coming! - Paul Revere
The final stamp to the ultimate failure of the monkee in chief and his clueless monkee in general. Trump needs to be elected soon.
No, just the much, much bigger Terrorist Watch List ... the one that has 10x as many people on it than when W. left office, and doesn't have any "due process" to find out why you're on it, unlike the No Fly list and its newer hearings and Readdress Number.
Indeed.
More seriously ...
- Arranged marriage by father ... father who denies his son was gay ... wife who confirms he's gay ... various men (of varying credibility) claiming he was his lover at one point, or even an extended period ("friends with benefits")
- Frequented the club as a patron regularly, and well known for such, experienced security guard, a DHS contractor at one point no less, who knew how to get around security
- Constant drunk, everyone confirms, repeatedly conflicted between his religion and homosexuality, by family, by some Muslim friends who were not gay, plus, most of all ...
- Repeatedly told many colleagues and friends, over multiple years, various statements about jihad, whether fascination or actual intent that he could do it, which caused him to be investigated by the FBI ...
BTW, that's not even adding in the fact that he was a registered Democratic voter and other, argumentative additives that the US media would have inserted if he was a registered Republican.
Er, um, not sure that's a move in a more positive direction. Frankly, I think Hillary is going to win. In any case, voting Gary Johnson. I refuse to do anything but vote my conscience since Dole-Kemp in '96. I should have voted Perot in '96, like I did '92.
The year that sucked the most was '08, Barr was not a Libertarian, and no one was worth a damn. So I wrote in Ross Perot. That's the only year I felt I wasted a vote. If people would just look to Johnson ... seriously.
If the Libertarians can just get enough votes, they are in the debates. And if they are in the debates, they can stop this rhetoric, counter-rheotric and counter-counter-rhetoric, and force the 2 parties to stop and focus on real issues.
The Libertarian party itself has its own issues, no different than the DNC or GOP. But they put up some great candidates ... Bednarik and, now, Johnson. Johnson has the most executive experience of any candidate, and you really have to look at what he did in New Mexico, let alone his life.
This is an election where voting libertarian does not make any sense at all. I have voted 3rd party every presidential election due to the terrible candidates the parties usually run. This time I shall vote for Donald Trump, I like a lot of what I see in the guy he has proven himself far more capable than I thought and exceeded my expectations at almost every turn.
Gary Johnson has shown me very little. He comes off as a loon and is way too focused on weed. His love of illegals and hatred of borders makes him useless for the tasks at hand. The USA was founded by Whites and Trump's immigration and trade policies are far closer to what I want than any libertarian could offer. The whole open borders thing with libertarians is a sad joke, no nation survives without some sort of borders and self interest.
Gary Johnson has shown me very little. He comes off as a loon and is way too focused on weed. His love of illegals and hatred of borders makes him useless for the tasks at hand. The USA was founded by Whites and Trump's immigration and trade policies are far closer to what I want than any libertarian could offer. The whole open borders thing with libertarians is a sad joke, no nation survives without some sort of borders and self interest.
