The woman that shot her is black. She wasn't charged. How is this about race again?
Shookster is a dumb jackass
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The woman that shot her is black. She wasn't charged. How is this about race again?
Shookster is a dumb jackass
LOL. Yeah, it's so stupid to mention the fact that the shooter's self defense charge was against someone who was: 1) a woman; 2) pregnant; and 3) unarmed.So now you’re adding the “unarmed” stupidity to the race baiting argument.
This is so reminiscent of why we were told the Travon Martin murder "couldn't possibly have been racial" because George Zimmerman 'was a minority too.'The woman that shot her is black. She wasn't charged. How is this about race again?
This is so reminiscent of why we were told the Travon Martin murder "couldn't possibly have been racial" because George Zimmerman 'was a minority too.'
Yes, it is stupid. More people are killed with “personal weapons” (fists, hands, or feet) than by “assault rifles” every year. Just because someone is unarmed does not mean they can’t cause harm. Pregnant or no, she attacked and battered the other woman. Enough so that when evidence was presented to an independent group of laypeople, they returned an indictment. Moreso, the grand jury thought she posed enough of a threat to the other woman that they refused to return and indictment on the shooter.LOL. Yeah, it's so stupid to mention the fact that the shooter's self defense charge was against someone who was: 1) a woman; 2) pregnant; and 3) unarmed.
But, hey, when you're packin' heat, baby, you're ready for any threat that comes along!!!!
This is so reminiscent of why we were told the Travon Martin murder "couldn't possibly have been racial" because George Zimmerman 'was a minority too.'
Holy crap. So this woman was 8 months pregnant, got drunk, killed 2 people and her unborn child, and doesn't have a single charge against her. Wow.This took all of 30 seconds to find. https://www.google.com/amp/s/newyor...jennifer-jorgensen-conviction-overturned/amp/
It really is a good thing liberals aren't half as shook ass little bitch snowflakes like you are, or else all of them would have you on ignore for your constant personal attacks
Originally, she was NOT charged for killing the two adults but WAS charged with reckless endangerment of her unborn child. Someone explain that logic for me.Holy crap. So this woman was 8 months pregnant, got drunk, killed 2 people and her unborn child, and doesn't have a single charge against her. Wow.
Can you please get you vocabulary right? She was CHARGED with manslaughter for the 2 adults, went to trial, and was acquitted at trial. She was CHARGED with manslaughter for recklessly causing the death of her child, went to trial, and was convicted at trial. She was later acquitted on appeal because the appellate court was worried about the same slippery slope brought up here of setting a precedent where a woman could be charged with manslaughter for any miscarriage. All of the charges were perfectly logical. Without seeing the evidence and testimony presented at trial, there’s no chance to know how logical the Long Island jury of her peers’ decision to acquit would have been.Originally, she was NOT charged for killing the two adults but WAS charged with reckless endangerment of her unborn child. Someone explain that logic for me.
Can you please get you vocabulary right? She was CHARGED with manslaughter for the 2 adults, went to trial, and was acquitted at trial. She was CHARGED with manslaughter for recklessly causing the death of her child, went to trial, and was convicted at trial. She was later acquitted on appeal because the appellate court was worried about the same slippery slope brought up here of setting a precedent where a woman could be charged with manslaughter for any miscarriage. All of the charges were perfectly logical. Without seeing the evidence and testimony presented at trial, there’s no chance to know how logical the Long Island jury of her peers’ decision to acquit would have been.
Shuckster plainly stated that white women whose actions caused a miscarriage would get off without being arrested, charged, and facing trial because racism.
Yeah boy, you sure nailed me. A pregnant white woman being charged for driving while intoxicated is exactly the same as a Black pregnant woman being charged for getting herself shot.Shuckster plainly stated that white women whose actions caused a miscarriage would get off without being arrested, charged, and facing trial because racism.
You’re flat out lying about why she got charged. She got charged because she committed a crime of battery that ultimately, in the state’s opinion, led to the baby dying. No different than someone getting charged for murder when an accomplice gets killed in the act of committing an armed robbery.Yeah boy, you sure nailed me. A pregnant white woman being charged for driving while intoxicated is exactly the same as a Black pregnant woman being charged for getting herself shot.
The way you are misrepresenting it makes it seem like she was just minding her own business and someone shot her.
I'll apologize when Bama charges a White woman for doing the same thing this woman did.You’re intentionally omitting her role in starting the fight and the basis for their charge to try to paint the Alabama authorities as racist.
I can guarantee you that I could find more than one case in Alabama if I looked where that has happened. What makes you so certain that it’s never happened?Someone shot HER for crying out loud!!!
I'll apologize when Bama charges a White woman for doing the same thing this woman did.
You made the case that this is race based. The woman who shot her is also black, so there's no way to make a case that race had anything to do with it. This case is actually one of the more objective ones that could be presented. How can you say that race is involved when both the perpetrator and the victim are both of the same race but one is exonerated?Someone shot HER for crying out loud!!!
I'll apologize when Bama charges a White woman for doing the same thing this woman did.
Baloney. I guarantee you that a white Southern gal from Alabama in the same situation wouldn't have been charged. No way.You made the case that this is race based. The woman who shot her is also black, so there's no way to make a case that race had anything to do with it.
So who would have been charged in this scenario if both women were white? The white woman who was acting in self defense or the white woman who instigated it?Baloney. I guarantee you that a white Southern gal from Alabama in the same situation wouldn't have been charged. No way.
Neither.So who would have been charged in this scenario if both women were white? The white woman who was acting in self defense or the white woman who instigated it?
So who would have been charged in this scenario if both women were white? The white woman who was acting in self defense or the white woman who instigated it?
So you are telling me that if a fight ensues between 2 white women and one of them gets shot that nobody faces charges? Do you honestly believe that the system is really that racist in nature?Neither.
From the same jurisdiction: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.al..._delivered_stillborn_af_1.html?outputType=ampNeither.
I'm really disturbed by that story, but your response is game, set, match. This is emperical evidence that this case wasn't based on race at all. Same district, similar circumstances, equal judicial process.From the same jurisdiction: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.al.com/news/birmingham/2016/11/mom_who_delivered_stillborn_af_1.html?outputType=amp
She’s white in case you don’t read the article. I can go all through the South and find cases where women are jailed, black and white, for causing the death of their unborn. I don’t have statistics, but your theory is that it doesn’t happen.
Most police officers have story after story of how terrible parents of all races and backgrounds can be to their kids, born and unborn. Sometimes good people make bad decisions but sometimes bad people are just bad people.I'm really disturbed by that story, but your response is game, set, match. This is emperical evidence that this case wasn't based on race at all. Same district, similar circumstances, equal judicial process.
From the same jurisdiction: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.al.com/news/birmingham/2016/11/mom_who_delivered_stillborn_af_1.html?outputType=amp
She’s white in case you don’t read the article. I can go all through the South and find cases where women are jailed, black and white, for causing the death of their unborn. I don’t have statistics, but your theory is that it doesn’t happen.
Jesus, SNORTING COKE is a tad bit different than having another person SHOOT you, don't you think?She’s white in case you don’t read the article. I can go all through the South and find cases where women are jailed, black and white, for causing the death of their unborn.
No one should be ashamed to admit he is wrong, which is but saying, in other words, that he is wiser today than he was yesterday.”Jesus, SNORTING COKE is a tad bit different than having another person SHOOT you, don't you think?
Like your drunk driving example earlier, I'd put this one squarely in the Momma-to-be is at fault category. For the umpteen time, show me a white preggo who authorities charged with manslaughter after someone else shoots her.
“No matter how you try to spin it, this is the craziest damn thing I've ever heard.
Would it make any difference if she was kicked in the belly as opposed to being shot? The chick started a fight and the other lady was defending herself.Jesus, SNORTING COKE is a tad bit different than having another person SHOOT you, don't you think?
Like your drunk driving example earlier, I'd put this one squarely in the Momma-to-be is at fault category. For the umpteen time, show me a white preggo who authorities charged with manslaughter after someone else shoots her.
No matter how you try to spin it, this is the craziest damn thing I've ever heard.
but he has a history of digging in and then never accepting he was wrong. im going to add this to the growing list.Shuckster, this isn't a good look for you bruh. You either appeal to emotion or you use sarcasm and emojis. Either way it seems near impossible to debate with you... I don't know how Sk8 does it. Stop digging in.
But she wasn’t kicked in the belly.Would it make any difference if she was kicked in the belly as opposed to being shot?
You really need to learn about the laws of self-defense and then go read an unbiased analysis or even the transcripts of the Trayvon Martin trial. You are extremely ignorant about both topics.But she wasn’t kicked in the belly.
She was shot ... with a real gun ... with real bullets.
The very notion that a person can shoot an unarmed person — a five-month pregnant female no less — and the good people of Alabama can say that’s ‘a-okay’ is appalling. It’s Travon Martin all over again. But to THEN turn around and charge the victim with manslaughter is even crazier.
Simply put, you don’t bring a gun to a fist fight.
Just because you keep repeating the same stupid statement doesn’t make it any less stupid. Go learn about the subject.I read about a shootout on a highway when one guy had the gall to cut another guy off on the road. But this road rage incident became the Shootout at the OK Corral because both drivers had permits to carry a concealed weapon. At least both of these dumbasses had guns.
But shooting another person in a fistfight — who is unarmed — is as stupid and as reckless as it gets.
Then please educate all of us on the subject.Just because you keep repeating the same stupid statement doesn’t make it any less stupid. Go learn about the subject.
You are pivoting your argument now. It started with the race factor, now it's about the gun.I read about a shootout on a highway when one guy had the gall to cut another guy off on the road. But this road rage incident became the Shootout at the OK Corral because both drivers had permits to carry a concealed weapon. At least both of these dumbasses had guns.
But shooting another person in a fistfight — who is unarmed — is as stupid and as reckless as it gets.
Now don’t be lazy. I could take my time to teach you but it’s better that you go learn it from experts and not me who you will just dismiss.Then please educate all of us on the subject.
I'd love to learn why a gun in necessary to resolve a dispute where a lethal weapon is NOT involved.
Without reading the transcript, we can never know what really occurred and thus can’t make the assertion of it being crazy.