Just curious how you guys feel. If we beat LSU, are we National Champions?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes 26 In a row WE ARE SUPER NATIONAL CHAMPS!!!!Just curious how you guys feel. If we beat LSU, are we National Champions?
No, now we will claim an INTERCONTINENTAL WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP. Next year maybe a Galaxy Championship.Just curious how you guys feel. If we beat LSU, are we National Champions?
Only way I really think there's a claim this year is if OU wins the CFP.
We are playing for The Keller Williams Championship Trophy which you win by gaining more real estate in the heads of the SEC trolls
Just curious how you guys feel. If we beat LSU, are we National Champions?
We? Worry about Khaki U making it 5 straight all-time against The boys old Florida.Just curious how you guys feel. If we beat LSU, are we National Champions?
Why?Only way I really think there's a claim this year is if OU wins the CFP.
Why?
Being the only undefeated team in FBS last year was a big part of the claim to me. The Colley Matrix made it record book official. The transitive property of the Auburn win was beautiful icing on the cake. This year just isn't playing out the same way. I think DW would find other ways to push the broken system.
I think the same thing. Undefeated + Colley Matrix + Auburn win did it for me last year.
This year we only have the undefeated season (won't get Colley this time) and LSU sucks so don't think it makes sense to claim another one. It's still effed up to me that we didn't get into the playoffs after 2 undefeated seasons. For that reason alone, I will be okay with whatever DW does (if he claims it, I'll have his back).
No. It's a fake system anyway, so we can make as many fake national championships as we want
No. It's a fake system anyway, so we can make as many fake national championships as we want. I'm also making Milton a fake player of the year award. The entire system is garbage so why give it any respect?
We should name Danny White CFI chairman for life and have completely separate committee meetings and rankings next year.
Emperors of College Football (ECF I and II)
Let's get Little Caesar's to sponsor us and we can be the "Extra Most Bestest College Football Champion"What if we just claim "Even Championer than Bama." Or Championest! Double Badass Champs. National Champs Financial level 1.
Kyle Israel probably needs a job.B2B Champs. Neva Lost.
Claim it and get Danny White a bodyguard.
I say claim whatever you want. It's not like it really matters quite honestly. A national championship isnt the equivalent of winning the super bowl, and even at that, the winner of the super bowl isnt necessarily the best team in the NFL, its just the team who won the last game. The whole thing is kind of stupid really. If UCF and Alabama played 10 games against each other and Bama won the first 9 but lost the 10th, UCF is the champ in the end.
Just take undefeated for what it is: proof that you're better than any team you played on the day you played them. It's not like any given team would beat every other team in every single matchup every day of the week.
Just go 1-0 every time you play.
Depends on who wins overall, if Oklahoma wins out and we beat LSU then Colley would likely agree with our claim. If Clemson, ND, or Alabama win, then Colley will most likely not support our claim as there is a better undefeated team. So... here is to Oklahoma winning it all?
We could end up with Bama, Clemson, Notre Dame, Oklahoma, Ohio St, and UCF all with 1 loss. Why does a loss at the end count against you more than a loss earlier in the season?
It wouldn't count more because it is at the end, it would count more because it would be a loss against the best team we faced, as opposed to OU in this scenario. Yes they lost to Texas, but also beat Texas and Alabama hypothetically. We wouldn't have the wins to compete against teams with the same number of losses. Our argument last year was we won all of our games, and no one else did. With equal losses, it would be pretty fair to say that we don't have the same wins the others have
Same thing that made last years valid. Alabama had better wins (Clemson, UGA), but we had 0 losses and didn't get a shot. 0 losses and no shot at NC = claim our own.Then what would make UCFs claim more valid if Oklahoma wins the playoffs and UCF finishes undefeated? Does 1 loss count for more than wins over Alabama and Clemson/Notre Dame?
What makes Colleys opinion (or computer model), more valid than my opinion or yours? Everybody at this point has passed judgment that Alabama is the best team, but if Oklahoma beats them then somehow it opens up the discussion and takes it from objective to subjective. If UCF loses to LSU then somehow they are out of the discussion, but Oklahoma losing to Texas earlier in the year doesnt matter? If Oklahoma wins the playoff and Ohio state wins their bowl game, which 1 loss team is the best between them?
We could end up with Bama, Clemson, Notre Dame, Oklahoma, Ohio St, and UCF all with 1 loss. Why does a loss at the end count against you more than a loss earlier in the season?