Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looking for the defense to contain Cunningham. He's a problem.jump starting an excellent season.
Being at home gives us one helluv an advantage!
Thought?
Yes, I forgot about him.....hmmm. Hopefully the Bounce house crowd will help out!! and our defense!Looking for the defense to contain Cunningham. He's a problem.
I've heard home field advantage doesn't mean anything...jump starting an excellent season.
Being at home gives us one helluv an advantage!
Thought?
I believe it will.crowd has to bring it
I've heard home field advantage doesn't mean anything...
Was it drastically better though? Against good QBs/offense (Cincy/SMU) the defense gave up 500-700 yards of offense. They did better against Florida, but Florida did still rush for 200+ yards averaging 6.8 a carry, and of course Navy had no issue running the ball.Our defense was drastically better after that louisville game. We ahould be able to play man coverage and spy their qb with our Knight position. Having someone like Hunter at DT can impact their ability to run up the middle
Or as Charlie Strong from Loserville once said (after we beat them at home)...."we know who the better team on the field was today"....I've heard home field advantage doesn't mean anything...
Or just bring everything we have! No Rush, but high tight pressure. Hands in his face and the bounce house yelling down his throat!We will have to do what we historically cannot.....neutralize a running QB and keep him in the pocket. Maybe consider a smaller, faster defensive unit in clear passing situations.
THE GREAT AND POWERFUL WOZ.....now that's reality!Was it drastically better though? Against good QBs/offense (Cincy/SMU) the defense gave up 500-700 yards of offense. They did better against Florida, but Florida did still rush for 200+ yards averaging 6.8 a carry, and of course Navy had no issue running the ball.
Louisville should put up at least 21 points with an offense that is returning almost everyone.
The short rest and travel for them should make the difference. Without those, I think the game would be very scary.
I would argue that in the smu and cincy games defense held up initially and then once the consistent MK 3 and out drives started to mount, the defense wore out rapidlyWas it drastically better though? Against good QBs/offense (Cincy/SMU) the defense gave up 500-700 yards of offense. They did better against Florida, but Florida did still rush for 200+ yards averaging 6.8 a carry, and of course Navy had no issue running the ball.
Louisville should put up at least 21 points with an offense that is returning almost everyone.
The short rest and travel for them should make the difference. Without those, I think the game would be very scary.
Our defense gave up 34 to NAVY the very next week lol.Our defense was drastically better after that louisville game. We ahould be able to play man coverage and spy their qb with our Knight position. Having someone like Hunter at DT can impact their ability to run up the middle
I don't remember the defense standing up against them early. Cincy outscored us 35-7 in the first half.I would argue that in the smu and cincy games defense held up initially and then once the consistent MK 3 and out drives started to mount, the defense wore out rapidly
At smu they did. We got better as year went on, especially at end. Boise st torched us early too. This was a 5-7 Louisville team for a reason, but people on here are acting like were lining up against BamaI don't remember the defense standing up against them early. Cincy outscored us 35-7 in the first half.
Were 14 directly off special teams?Our defense gave up 34 to NAVY the very next week lol.
As the year went one we were playing teams with a combined 1 FBS win.At smu they did. We got better as year went on, especially at end. Boise st torched us early too. This was a 5-7 Louisville team for a reason, but people on here are acting like were lining up against Bama
At smu they did. We got better as year went on, especially at end. Boise st torched us early too. This was a 5-7 Louisville team for a reason, but people on here are acting like were lining up against Bama
Then the same is true for MK’s wins during that timeframeAs the year went one we were playing teams with a combined 1 FBS win.
Yes and really more than that. We only gave up 7 points when Navy actually had to drive the length of the field. Most of their points were scored on drives less than 50 yards.Were 14 directly off special teams?
He ended up beating UCF on one leg for much of the 2nd half in last year's game.Looking for the defense to contain Cunningham. He's a problem.
That game was so frustrating. We had some good drives but at times we couldnt move the ball and kept giving Navy the ball at our 40.Yes and really more than that. We only gave up 7 points when Navy actually had to drive the length of the field. Most of their points were scored on drives less than 50 yards.
Great Woz speaks again! That 5-7 ACC Loserville record means nothing! They are a good team and we have a new defense. Offensively we may out score them but defense will be the key in this game. They are a better team this year, We'll have home field advantage. But it's early and this will be a real test for us! We need an "OVERPACKED" bounce house!In terms of dual threat QBs, Louisville's is the best this team saw last year or will see this year. Something that has been problematic for the defense in the past. Gus would take Malik in a nanosecond. Most publications have him as top 10 for QBs in 2022.
For us, this is a line up against Bama!At smu they did. We got better as year went on, especially at end. Boise st torched us early too. This was a 5-7 Louisville team for a reason, but people on here are acting like were lining up against Bama
We will win by 20For us, this is a line up against Bama!
Wow, you are confident. The Stanford was like that too. But, I gotta ask......a little wager here bee?We will win by 20
Were at 63% fpi to win. Ill take the bet. It is year two of T-Will’s system with a loaded secondary and improved Dline. We will have plenty of film to watch from last years contest and we will be playing with a chip on our shoulder at home.Wow, you are confident. The Stanford was like that too. But, I gotta ask......a little wager here bee?
ps: I used to let the hype get to me a lot. Now I'm more realistic.
Same prediction regardless of which QB plays?Were at 63% fpi to win. Ill take the bet. It is year two of T-Will’s system with a loaded secondary and improved Dline. We will have plenty of film to watch from last years contest and we will be playing with a chip on our shoulder at home.
UCF 37-17
OK, Bee, Ice Cold beer bet, where do you sit? ....I need to hand deliver you an Ice Cold beer hopefully! Or I'll send the beer guy over!Were at 63% fpi to win. Ill take the bet. It is year two of T-Will’s system with a loaded secondary and improved Dline. We will have plenty of film to watch from last years contest and we will be playing with a chip on our shoulder at home.
UCF 37-17
Were at 63% fpi to win. Ill take the bet. It is year two of T-Will’s system with a loaded secondary and improved Dline. We will have plenty of film to watch from last years contest and we will be playing with a chip on our shoulder at home.
UCF 37-17
Lose by 20 if MK plays whole gameSame prediction regardless of which QB plays?
our defense can’t be on the field as long as last year .Lose by 20 if MK plays whole game