ADVERTISEMENT

Carl Black and Test Driving Sports Cars

UCFBS

Todd's Tiki Bar
Gold Member
Oct 21, 2001
28,538
10,649
113
USA
A year and a half ago, I had an outstanding experience purchasing my wife's new Buick at Carl Black.


Short version ...

If you want to test drive a sports car at Carl Black, make sure you only work with the person you contact beforehand. If I had to guess, since they are so close to UCF, I think they probably get a lot of young kids that want to come in and want to drive Camaros and Corvettes, which only gets their salespeople into trouble. In my case, I was wearing my UCF polo as I had just come from the airport as I just flew home, so I'm sure that's exactly why the salesperson initially responded to me the way he did.

I.e., I probably came in looking like just another UCF student who wanted to test drive a sports car I couldn't afford.


Long version ...
spoiler tag purposely used to protect your innocent scrollbar ;)

Until 2014, we usually purchased my GM products from David Maus in Sanford, since they support our Corvette Club (Florida Corvette Club). But when we purchased my prior Chevrolet Equinox at David Maus in late 2012, they screwed up the Incentives, and we had to repeatedly get them to fix it during financing. Hence why we wanted to try Carl Black, and reward one of UCF's sponsors, for our next purchase.

Before purchasing, I tested out Carl Black's services by taking my 2009 Corvette Z51 to them, especially since they were closer. I verified they had a Corvette tech on-staff, and he was excellent. We ended up taking all three (3) of our GMs to Carl Black for servicing. We never had an issue and they always took care of us. So in 2014, when I my wife wanted a new car, I wanted to reward Carl Black on east Colonial for supporting UCF athletics.

My wife test drove no less than three (3) different cars that day, including a 2015 Chevrolet Camaro V6, but settled on the nimble 2014 Buick Encore (aka Chevrolet Trax) as her daily driver. From Sales to getting all of the Incentives correct in the Bill-of-Sale to the Financing, everyone was perfect, always cordial, very accommodating, and even ended up staying after closing to finish off our trade. Everyone even commented on my UCF polo, saying "Go Knights," and gave us some extra tickets for the next game, which I gave to some friends.

At that time, I promised Carl Black if I went to trade my 2009 Corvette Z51 for a Corvette Stingray Z51 or Z06, I'd come to them first.

In 2015, several of our club members on the east side of town stopped taking their Corvettes to Carl Black. Apparently they fired their Corvette Tech, and were repeatedly getting into arguments with owners over various things, even simple, obvious things. E.g., not wanting to use Mobil 1 andtheir own, preferred synthetic "blend" instead (despite GM recommending, and always using from the factory, Mobil 1 since 1984). Our club members are now taking their Corvettes to Autonation instead.

But I still wanted to reward Carl Black with my next purchase, given how they took care of us last time, even if I had the servicing done elsewhere.

The past few weeks my wife has been getting the itch for a Camaro again. And since I rarely drive my Corvette since I travel so much, less than 4,000 miles total in the past 3 years (Sebring, Road Atlanta, maybe a day drive every 2 months or so), I decided I might as well trade it while it still has some value. Since I'm waiting for Chevrolet to get the 'teething issues' out with the new Stingray and, even more so, Z06, plus the new 2016 Camaro SS models have the same LT1 V8 and 8-speed automatic as the Stingray, we decided to purchase a new 2016 Camaro SS. That way my wife would get the "fun car" she wanted, and I'd go for the V8 upgrade so I wouldn't mind parting with my Corvette.

I shopped around late this week, from Hendrick in Atlanta (where the brother of one of our Corvette Club members works) to Autonation (since they have Corvette tech) to Carl Black, to see what inventory was available. I kept to my promise and responded to Carl Black first, visiting them Saturday morning on the way home from the airport. I hadn't slept much the past 3 days, even missed my Friday night flight due to a customer issue, but was excited to get my wife in a V8 to see if she liked it more than the V6 in the older 2015 model she had tried out earlier. Shar had taken my prior inquiry, and returned with a phone call, as I'm sure she saw in our file that we've purchased from them before, and still bring some of our cars to them for servicing.

We arrived just before 9am, and apparently their morning staff meeting ran over until past 9:15. No problem, and my wife and I conversed while looking at the Z06 in the showroom. At 9:20, I finally decided to leave and come back, after all, I was very hungry and a bit exhausted. But just as I got up, the morning meeting broke, and I was greeted by a young gentleman.

I mentioned Shar had already contacted us about our inquiry, and he asked if he could still help. I sincerely appreciated his offer, as I'm sure he probably suspected we had been waiting for a bit (given their meeting ran over). I told him we were interested in a Camaro 1SS, knew they didn't have one on the lot, but would like to custom order one -- all while I wanted my wife to drive the 2SS they had, to ensure she didn't mind the added power over the V6. Immediately I was shutdown with, basically (and almost directly) a "No" and how they "don't let people test drive their sports cars." Even my wife, who is a teacher and extremely understanding, was shocked at his first response.

It took me a couple of seconds, but I know I explicitly said my wife was going to drive it (let alone we're both into our 40s). I was still a bit shocked at his response, especially since Shar was aware of our inquiry on a Camaro SS, plus our history with Carl Black, including servicing our cars, including the Corvette. I don't know if he had just been reprimanded or otherwise had an issue with a past customer who test drove one of the sports cars, and I'm sure my UCF polo didn't help. Maybe he thought I was a student, but he really was adamant about no one driving any sports car before I even said anything.

Finally, I made my first response, which was probably a bit confrontational, "Well, I could take my business elsewhere then." I'm sure my response was a bit of a bark of my own. My wife said it wasn't out of line, and it wasn't loud, considering his response, but more of, 'Yo' dog, I'm the customer, you're the person I'd like to give a commission ... even if 9 out of 10 customers don't, I could be that 1.' If I could go back in time ... I'd probably say something like that instead.

He responded with, "Well, I can ask my manager." At this point, I was just going to ask for Shar, but I was still a bit shocked. Instead, I sat down on the chair behind me, and as he sat down in the one next to it, as I said, "You know, I own a Corvette. And I promised and I'd like to buy my next one here, because we had a great experience buying here before." I didn't want to dislike him. After all, the last guy with a UCF shirt that came in here could have been a kid who totaled one, and got him into trouble, possibly fired. I didn't know his circumstances, and people do abuse car salespeople.

My wife, being the better reader of people, read his eyes and would tell me later he had his "oh sh--!" moment right there. And that's when she intervened, trying to confirm, "So ... you can approve it with your manager?" And I just let my wife talk from then on.

After he walked away to talk to his manager, I told my wife we were leaving, and we'd come back later, when I was fed, less tired and in a better mood. She agreed that might be best. I was also worried I barked at him in front of his peers, although my wife later said no, no one looked and I wasn't loud, only confirmed what I barked. But then she also said he didn't start the conversation well. Again, I can only imagine how many issues Carl Black gets with UCF students just wanting to test drive sports cars. I even later joked with my wife that he probably paid me a complement by thinking I was that young to be a UCF student.

Once home, while taking a nap, my wife found a Chevrolet Camaro 1SS with the color she loves, that dark Blue Velvet Metallic (I'm more partial to the sky-like Hyper Blue Metallic). Even better, it had the Dual-Mode NPP Exhaust like my Corvette with its LS3+NPP. It just sounds too sweet to not have. It was at Jon Hall Chevrolet in Daytona, who sponsors one of our Club's sisters, the Ponce Inlet Corvette Club. Our Club members regularly help them with events, and we even attended their Corvette Car Show a few years back at Jon Hall, and Hall was most excellent hosts.

I even loved the upgraded rims in their 1SS package, though I wish the Camaro had Michelins instead of the crappy Goodyears (which is a GM issue, not the dealer). Even Corvette Racing (and finally the GM on the production Corvette itself) dropped Goodyear years ago to the tune of 1-2s and 3-4s faster lap times at Sebring and Le Mans, respectively.

After getting Jon Hall to come up $4,000 on my Corvette in trade (I wasn't going to trade it if I couldn't get at least the bottom Kelly Blue Book trade value for "Excellent"), we drove away with our new, $40K Chevorlet Camaro 1SS, it's 455 hp/ft-lb LT1 V8 engine, that new, fast shifting 8-speed automatic. My wife only drives automatics, I prefer manuals, but the new auto-8 shifts almost as fast as a dual-clutch (even upshifts faster than some), plus the sweet sounding NPP exhaust with the valves that open up.

Here's the "Car Porn" for those of you that love GM sports cars ... (my apologies if not)
P1030573 by Bryan Smith, on Flickr

Now I'm still going to consider Carl Black when I do go to buy a new Corvette in a few years, since they support UCF. And who knows, I could have responded better to the salesperson that greeted me, especially since they are so close to UCF with lots of kids who try to come over and drive their sports cars (I was wearing a UCF polo, after all).

But I recommend if you are going to try to test drive any sports car at Carl Black, contact them beforehand like I always do, and then just ask for the person you were already corresponding with. Will remove a lot of confusion, and any issues that Carl Black likely has with common UCF students. I didn't think of that until after he initially responded, and I probably should have just said 'I'll wait for Shar.'
 
Last edited:
You handled it better than I would have. I would have been asking to speak to a manager and telling him exactly why I was headed up the road a few miles to X dealership. I'm sure that they have policies/procedures in place with their high end models but it sounds like he might have went about it the wrong way and could have very well lost a customer. I know there is the "don't judge a book by it's cover", everyone is a buyer mentality but that should have been even more true with you being that you were there with your wife and didn't look like a 21 year old kid rolling out of bed from his latest hangover to visit a dealership at 9:30 in the morning.

Nice vehicle by the way. It's always nice when a customer walks in knowing that they want to walk out with a purchase of some kind and having the means to do so rather than getting that person that is on the fence and you know damn well that they won't last a year in their new vehicle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFBS
You handled it better than I would have. I would have been asking to speak to a manager and telling him exactly why I was headed up the road a few miles to X dealership. I'm sure that they have policies/procedures in place with their high end models but it sounds like he might have went about it the wrong way and could have very well lost a customer. I know there is the "don't judge a book by it's cover", everyone is a buyer mentality but that should have been even more true with you being that you were there with your wife and didn't look like a 21 year old kid rolling out of bed from his latest hangover to visit a dealership at 9:30 in the morning.
The guy has to make a living, and I left more because of how I felt about myself (responding), than anything he did. I honestly was just going to come back later, and order a custom build, but my wife searched and found pretty much exactly what we wanted at Jon Hall in Daytona.

In any case ... my main point: I'm sure Carl Black gets an endless number of kids trying to drive the sports cars, being so close to UCF. So be sure to inquire beforehand (like I did), and then only deal with the person you have already (which I did not).

Nice vehicle by the way. It's always nice when a customer walks in knowing that they want to walk out with a purchase of some kind and having the means to do so rather than getting that person that is on the fence and you know damn well that they won't last a year in their new vehicle.
Thanx. It's my wife's, but it has as much power and pickup as my lighter Corvette. I just don't get home to drive it much, and it has been only losing money the past 3 years.

This way my wife now has the "fun car" with the V8+auto she wants, and it's pretty close to what I had when I want to have fun. We also got a $0 deductible 60/60K GMPP (now Ally -- but official GM) extended warranty -- as we do plan to enjoy it for at least 5 years and it never hurts to have $0 deductible so you can get GM to fix anything without question.
 
I bought a 2012 2SS Camaro from Carl Black in 2013 and they had no problems letting me drive any of their cars. Maybe this is a new policy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFBS
I bought a 2012 2SS Camaro from Carl Black in 2013 and they had no problems letting me drive any of their cars. Maybe this is a new policy.
As I said, he must have had an issue earlier in the week or something, or maybe Carl Black has had a lot of issues with UCF students coming over and always wanting to test drive their sports cars. So maybe it is a newer police where a manager has to approve everything, if not already pre-approved before arrival. Heck, it could have been the very reason their staff meeting ran over. ;)

I'm still a bit surprised he didn't just offer to go talk to Shar, or let her handle it. The first thing I mentioned was we were already working with her, and she was expecting us. I even verified with the receptionist that Shar was on-site while they were in their morning staff meeting. Shar had just called me a hour earlier, and it sounded like she had everything lined up, especially since it sounded like she looked up our file. That's the first thing every dealer salesperson does, especially when it's an Internet or other request ... they look up in GM's database who we are, what we've bought and how much service we give them.

Because, furthermore, it's more than just buying from them before, and giving them our service ...

This is the big one -- the #1 GM buyers on-file in their system are those who attend Corvette Racing events either domestically and, even more so, in Europe.

Just in North America alone, people (even currently non-GM owners) who visit Corvette Racing booths at sports car racing events are 10x more likely to buy a GM vehicle than those who attend NASCAR or IndyCar events and visit GM booths there. That's in their system, and makes us their #1 target buyer when we contact a dealer -- especially when already owning more than 1 GM, let alone a Corvette itself (which, finally with the Stingray, is reversing the age of the average owner, unlike the average age of a Porsche owner).

Even the US GAO had to point out to GM during their bankruptcy -- because GM stupidly ignored their own metrics they had collected for years. At the time, GM was considering ditching the Corvette, or at least force a twin-turbo V6 into it (no 5th Gen LS V8 engine) like they almost did in the '90s too. The GAO were the ones that completely reversed that, showing GM the Corvette was their #1 money maker, which then resulted in GM actually giving Tadge et al. money (to make the Stingray, 5th Gen LS V8 which is now used in the Camaro too, etc...).

We always do Sebring and Road Atlanta, and have attended almost every track in the IMSA-ACO-FIA sanctioned ALMS, now USSC, series over the last decade plus.

Which is why, when I pre-contact a GM dealership -- especially with all the GMs we own in their system -- we are their #1 prospective buyer. The statistics don't lie, Corvette owners who attend Corvette Racing events buy GMs, overwhelmingly, with little effort, more than any other GM owner.

We are their #1 highest percentage shopper that will walk away with a GM, usually a high margin vehicle, period.

I feel for this kid. I hope no one blames him. If anything, it's on the dealership, because it seems he was under a lot of pressure not to let people test drive sports cars.
 
Last edited:
Quit calling a Camaro a sports car.
Normally I'd agree with you, they are "Pony" cars.

But the 2016 with the Alpha platform, instead of the crappy Zeta (old G8 anyone?) changed my mind. I've driven an ATS with the same chassis and handling so, frankly, when it can kick a M3's butt on the track, that's good enough to qualify as a "sports car" with me. Otherwise I wouldn't have traded my Corvette.

That all said ... it's what the GM dealers state, at least for those with high-torque engines like the SS, Camaro SS and Corvette.
 
And what is it that you drive?
I've found there are 3 types of sports car people ...

  • Americans and Europeans who feel the 21st century of Chrysler, Ford and GM sports cars have become more peer to European sports cars
  • Europeans who still assert superiority in many cases, but recognize the American changes in the 21st century are more capable
  • Americans who are totally ignorant, and are what I call "wannabe Eurosnobs," even though not many actual European Eurosnobs seem to exist any more
I.e., I think Corvettes and Vipers racing in Europe pretty much put those to rest, especially since there are more of them racing -- professionally -- in Europe at any time than in North America.

No one is claiming the US has production cars that are like European supercars. But you can get a lot of -- if not superior to -- $200-400K European performance, especially handling, in a $30-120K US DoT road legal product. In fact, most of the Big 3 offer "non road legal" versions of their vehicles (e.g., Corvette Z06X), so they can remove the stupid things the US DoT requires, that Jezza et al. often complain about in US production sports cars. It's amazing the utterly stupid things the US DoT requires, that have nothing to do with emissions or even safety in the end.

Even on the Stingray, Tadge "fought the law and the law won," adding about 200-300lbs for the US DoT. and all sorts of stupidity that was not needed that just annoys European customers. I always laugh when they complain about the "hardness" of the seat, and the utter annoyances of the seatbelt, among other things that should be different in a nearly 200mph, 1.1G+ lateral capable vehicle.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: KnightrousOxide
There hasn't been a good sports car built since 1970. 1967 if you're a Corvette.
 
There hasn't been a good sports car built since 1970. 1967 if you're a Corvette.
Obviously not a fan of Mitchell's Mako 2.0, eh?

Let's be honest ...

from the time GM outlawed Zora from even building and racing on his own dime in the early '60s to the initial 5th Generation of the late '90s, no Corvette was really designed to be a world class sports car. It was an American icon built on what GM visionaries thought a sports car should look like, not so much be capable of, and far less proven to be.

Then that all changed after the French tinkered with Viper in North American IMSA GT, with the clear intent of taking it across the pond under full FIA GT sanction, including Le Mans itself. That's when people in GM said they weren't going to stand by like they did in the late '60s when Ford enacted revenge on Enzo (c/o Shelby), and the rest is history.

Today the FIA GT2 Corvette C7.R has an unmodified chassis and base body aero from the production Z06, which already stiffer than most sports cars in its class and produces the most body-only downforce of any production vehicle unmodified. All thanx with a formerly exotic costing chassis and its tooling benefiting from its economies-of-scale that is hard for anyone else to compete with.

It's almost getting to the point that indie teams will be bred out by economies-of-scale. At least as long as the new, non-science, political bafoons in the EPA don't outlaw production-based racing, which is at odds with the part of the EPA, along with the DOT, who give out trophies for fuel economy, alternative fuels, hybrids and virtually every major safety improvement ... all done first in production-based racing (then adopted in production) over the last 30+ years.

And to think GM almost shut down Corvette in the '90s, and reconsidered selling it or shutting it down during bankruptcy. Didn't take the US GAO's accountants to figure out GM had been shooting itself in its foot, and that freed up both control and funds to Tadge et al. Heck, GM just unified their entire performance powertrain (including hybrid, fuel cell, etc...), and that combined with the various patents on everything from dual-clutch to assembly that can only be used mid-engine, new "eRay" trademark and the alleged "paint shop" that cost almost a half-billion at Bowling Green (paint shop -- ha! Good one Harland!) is pretty much pointing to one thing.

Tadge's repeated comment about the only way to getting to a hybrid would be mid-engine are likely to come true very soon.
 
Last edited:
Mustangs, camaros, challengers, are "sporty cars" but not traditional sports cars. They are Grand Tourers (GT). Traditionally, sports cars are two seat performance cars.
 
Mustangs, camaros, challengers, are "sporty cars" but not traditional sports cars. They are Grand Tourers (GT). Traditionally, sports cars are two seat performance cars.
Er, um, what?!

First off, BMW (M-series) would definitely disagree with you.
And more to the original fork you guys made ... the Alpha platform from GM, which includes the 6th gen Camaro (2016+), is very much designed to compete against, and has bested, some of the M-series.

Second, FIA (especially the infamous Group B, in addition to GT) would disagree with you.
There is just so much history here ... just cannot even dive into.

Third, the Nissan "Godzilla" (GTR-R) has more than proved you can build an alleged "pony class car" that can destroy 2 seat sports coupes, even those AWD supercars, as an AWD, multi-row.

So, lastly ...

I've never heard of Grand Tourers (GT) being used for only multi-row seaters ... and though it originated with the 2-seat roadster in the first place?!
Just because the Big 3 co-opted the meaning in the '60s does not mean GT is about multi-row coupes ... far from it!

In fact, it's this type of conflicting 'North American" v. "European" v. (my favorite) "North American assumption of European" conflicting definitions that just make me go ... WTF?!

Now, for some reason, I want to become some overweight, old fart Brit, extolling the virtues of how Lancia is the greatest car maker ever.
 
Last edited:
Er, um, what?!

First off, BMW (M-series) would definitely disagree with you.
And more to the original fork you guys made ... the Alpha platform from GM, which includes the 6th gen Camaro (2016+), is very much designed to compete against, and has bested, some of the M-series.

Second, FIA (especially the infamous Group B, in addition to GT) would disagree with you.
There is just so much history here ... just cannot even dive into.

Third, the Nissan "Godzilla" (GTR-R) has more than proved you can build an alleged "pony class car" that can destroy 2 seat sports coupes, even those AWD supercars, as an AWD, multi-row.

So, lastly ...

I've never heard of Grand Tourers (GT) being used for only multi-row seaters ... and though it originated with the 2-seat roadster in the first place?!
Just because the Big 3 co-opted the meaning in the '60s does not mean GT is about multi-row coupes ... far from it!

In fact, it's this type of conflicting 'North American" v. "European" v. (my favorite) "North American assumption of European" conflicting definitions that just make me go ... WTF?!

Now, for some reason, I want to become some overweight, old fart Brit, extolling the virtues of how Lancia is the greatest car maker ever.

Sport coupes, GTs.. Sporting cars, not putting down their performer and capabilities, but they are not true "sports cars". Yes, lines have been blurred quite a bit, due to increased performance and handling of aforementioned 4-seaters.. To the purist, they aren't necissarily "sports cars". It's all semantics.

A brand new Honda accord will outperform (in acceleration) a 1980's Ferrari 308. That's not going to make me call an accord a "sports car". We own a 2005 BMW e series with the sport package... It outperforms the M3's of the previous generation. Does not make it a sports car either.

Honda S2000, Mazda mx-5.. Those are sports cars. Performance-wise, they can't really hold a candle to the new generation pony cars, but in the traditional since, they are "true" sports cars.

I am not disrespecting any of the alpha platform GM cars, nor bmw m series, Audi RS, etc. all fantastic cars. Just not true sports cars, regardless of performance specs.
 
Sport coupes, GTs.. Sporting cars, not putting down their performer and capabilities, but they are not true "sports cars".
Define "true sports car"? I don't think you can.

Yes, lines have been blurred quite a bit, due to increased performance and handling of aforementioned 4-seaters.
But are 4 seat coupes really traditional 4 seaters? Have you sat in the back of a Camaro, especially the smaller, narrower, shorter Alpha platform (2016+)?

The whole definition is "blurred" altogether.

To the purist, they aren't necissarily "sports cars". It's all semantics.
I'd argue semantics are out-the-window.

Listen, I love Corvettes, Ferraris, Lambos, McClarens and Porsches, among others. But I'm not going to say the pony cars are much less capable any more, not to mention the GT-R literally makes the argument that heavier ponies can compete, and then some.

A brand new Honda accord will outperform (in acceleration) a 1980's Ferrari 308.
And even the Type R isn't quite, although you are now flirting with more than just capable acceleration. Granted, most Accords and other models from Honda are designed to have narrower wheels and better fuel economy. But there's not much keeping them from some modification of the platform to be more.

No, they are not a 2-seat coupe, won't (usually) pull 1G+ lateral, and their not quite a "pony car" either. But they will best some '80s supercars. So, where is the "line"? There really isn't one, although I agree, even the Type R is pushing it.

That's not going to make me call an accord a "sports car".
But we're not talking even a Type R. We're talking about the Alpha platform, the Camaro (2016+), the Cadillac ATS, etc...

We own a 2005 BMW e series with the sport package... It outperforms the M3's of the previous generation. Does not make it a sports car either.
BMW would argue otherwise, as they are run in FIA GT. I'd have to agree, although BMW does play some games the others don't like in FIA GT (don't get me started).

In fact, one could strongly argue the Z4 isn't exactly a "sports car," from another angle. Which brings me to ...

Honda S2000, Mazda mx-5. Those are sports cars.
And yet pull less than 1G lateral, while the M-series, GM Alpha platform and others can pull more than 1G. So, where is the line?

To some, the Z4 (let alone Z3), S2000 and MX-5 are not "true sports cars." To even consider your argument, I'd have to say theirs are valid too! I mean, there are some pretty crappy 2-seaters, and in this case, far less capable than a "true" sports car.

We just don't get many smaller "roadsters" in the US, like the short-lived Pontiac Solstice/Saturn Sky. But to many, those aren't "true" sports cars either. So what gives?

SIDE NOTE: I keep arguing GM should drop a small, V8 pushrod -- like a 283ci -- something smaller, shorter, low-center-of-gravity than a smaller displacement, but OHC V6 turbo, into a classic roadster roadster, and build a new generation of classic Corvette/Jaguar-type roadster ... call it the "Corvette Clipper" or something.

Performance-wise, they can't really hold a candle to the new generation pony cars, but in the traditional since, they are "true" sports cars.
I utterly disagree on this assertion of "true" sports cars.

I wouldn't have bought a Camaro pre-2016. It didn't even come close to the Corvette's handling. But now, that Alpha platform is bringing more ... a lot more. Not quite as good, but damn close.

In any case, it's my wife's, not mine. ;)

I am not disrespecting any of the alpha platform GM cars, nor bmw m series, Audi RS, etc. all fantastic cars. Just not true sports cars, regardless of performance specs.
And I'm saying ... the line doesn't exist any more.
 
Last edited:
Look.. All your points are valid BS... Just an old fart like me has a certain mind set on what constitutes a sports car vs a performance GT. All great cars, and they all do incredible things.

Two seats, great handling, driving fun vs practicality, preferably a rag top. To me, that defines sports car. I have owned a TR4a, a TR6, MX-5, and I am currently restoring a 1968 MGB. The driving experience of cars like these is way different than your buttoned down GT coupe. Not better, different, depending on taste.

Side bar, many of the cars you are talking about, (Cadillac ATS and Camaro) I believe are actually better products than what the Germans are putting out. (Porsche being the exception). Corvette, forget about it. Best performance value per dollar than anything out there period. Good old USA is finally making incredible enthusiast cars again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFBS
Who the **** cares. If it goes fast in a straight line, or around a corner (or both!) and it isn't a mini van, who gives a flying **** what you call it.
 
Did they let Mother drive the car only on the condition that she give the salesman road head as he drove the car back to the dealer? #teamchez
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT