Please provide the link where the CDC says 40% of COVID deaths are vaccinated---not an effing tweet from an ex-baseball player. If such data exists, I'd love to read it. But this is why people around here think you, BS, Crazy, and Melvin are retarded. You post tweets like this that have ZERO citations or links to anything relevant.
Are you serious? Do you think they are going to hold a press conference on this? Walensky and Fauci came clean on this months ago that 99.5% was rigged. Only MSM and tools like you never got the memo
@Great2BAKnight2 love to hear your thoughts on the data analysis by the independent guys. Are you still at 99.5% pandemic of unvaccinated?
Dan's Data | DanH | Substack
Condensed Relevant Data on Various Topic's. Click to read Dan's Data, by DanH, a Substack publication. Launched 3 years ago.dansdata.substack.com
Are you serious? Do you think they are going to hold a press conference on this? Walensky and Fauci came clean on this months ago that 99.5% was rigged. Only MSM and tools like you never got the memo
@Great2BAKnight2 love to hear your thoughts on the data analysis by the independent guys. Are you still at 99.5% pandemic of unvaccinated?
Dan's Data | DanH | Substack
Condensed Relevant Data on Various Topic's. Click to read Dan's Data, by DanH, a Substack publication. Launched 3 years ago.dansdata.substack.com
I think @Boston.Knight should be put in a straightjacket and sent to a mental institution. The guy is obsessed with Covid and vaccines. It’s consuming his life. He’s not all there.Yeap. I figured as much. I ask for something of value and you respond with "Dan's data." You cannot make this shit up, folks.
You are an unmitigated joke.
I think @Boston.Knight should be put in a straightjacket and sent to a mental institution. The guy is obsessed with Covid and vaccines. It’s consuming his life. He’s not all there.
He is legitimately delusional.Yeap. I figured as much. I ask for something of value and you respond with "Dan's data." You cannot make this shit up, folks.
You are an unmitigated joke.
You lost him at math.If his data is right (no idea, not likely)
40% of the total deaths are coming from the 75% of the eligible population who have at least one shot.
60% of total deaths are coming from the 25% of the eligible population that have no shots
That means the vaccine lowers your chance of death by over 80%
Even your own chud data is a testament to the effectiveness of the vaccine.
Last week the cumulative breakthrough deaths was 7,178, so we added about 3,700 last week. That's probably where the 40% number comes from.
9,060 total covid deaths last week.
3,700 ÷ 9,060 = 40%
I thought it was universally known that @Boston.Knight has a 2nd grade level math comprehension.You lost him at math.
Dear dumb twat bitch,Are you guys delusional, or seriously this stupid? His number is correct and yet the circle jerk over a vaccine continues.
Are you guys delusional, or seriously this stupid? His number is correct and yet the circle jerk over a vaccine continues.
That's a legitimate argument to make, but it isn't the one at hand. It looks like our numbers are trending the same way they did in the UK, where you are statistically more likely to be hospitalized and die from covid while being vaccinated than unvaccinated. It isn't just raw numbers that they are looking at.If everyone was vaccinated and deaths dropped by 99% you'd be able to say
"100% of deaths are of people who are vaccinated. See, the vaccine doesn't work."
You see the problem? You're bad at interpretation of data and you should leave it to professionals instead of people who are trying to mislead you for confirmation bias dopamine hits.
What percentage of that 25% are in an age group that has significantly less natural risk of dying?Dear dumb twat bitch,
If
a) 40% of all deaths come from 75% of all people
And
b) 60% of all deaths come from 25% of all people
Which group of people is significantly more protected from deaths
Signed,
Your high school freshman math teacher
What percentage of that 25% are in an age group that has significantly less natural risk of dying?
Signed,
The circle jerk ring leader
Data not provided but you can guess. What do you think?What percentage of that 25% are in an age group that has significantly less natural risk of dying?
Signed,
Your college calculus professor
You seriously are an idiot. We have terrible data collection in the US on this issue, which is the problem. It's not about math. If we don't even report deaths that are stratified by age group then how can anybody tell what's what?
Can you put a bullet to your head, so we can accurately report the death of a celibate loser?You seriously are an idiot. We have terrible data collection in the US on this issue, which is the problem. It's not about math. If we don't even report deaths that are stratified by age group then how can anybody tell what's what?
No idea. Where are the numbers on the control groups, segmented into age ranges? They probably have it somewhere but it isn't readily available. Other countries don't seem to have this issue, so the best we can do is rely on their reports.Data not provided but you can guess. What do you think?
Because we're not having a discussion at the margins. I did the math on the chud data and it showed an 80% reduction in death rate.You seriously are an idiot. We have terrible data collection in the US on this issue, which is the problem. It's not about math. If we don't even report deaths that are stratified by age group then how can anybody tell what's what?
Which is all fine and well, but if you can't even look at the ranges what good does it do? What other variables may affect the outcome? It's not as simple as a×b=c.Because we're not having a discussion at the margins. I did the math on the chud data and it showed an 80% reduction in death rate.
Hey, did you disappear? No comment on the link to CDC numbers?Please provide the link where the CDC says 40% of COVID deaths are vaccinated---not an effing tweet from an ex-baseball player. If such data exists, I'd love to read it. But this is why people around here think you, BS, Crazy, and Melvin are retarded. You post tweets like this that have ZERO citations or links to anything relevant.
He doesn’t even realize that that doesn’t help his case. Allow me to add that to your earlier post:Data not provided but you can guess. What do you think?
Vaccination rates are higher for 65+ and/or people with illnessesWhich is all fine and well, but if you can't even look at the ranges what good does it do? What other variables may affect the outcome? It's not as simple as a×b=c.
No, he really didn't. You asked for official numbers. You have them now so do you have an opinion, or are you just going to defer because BK was proven correct?Where am I? Out with my wife and kids. I have a life. Might want to try it sometime.
Plus, fried chicken already annihilated you, celibate boy.
Provide the number of deaths for each age range and vaccination status. FC used 75%, but that is only for a segment of the population. If it was for the entirety, we'd be having a completely different discussion right now politically.He doesn’t even realize that that doesn’t help his case. Allow me to add that to your earlier post:
“ dumb twat bitch,
If
a) 40% of all deaths come from 75% of all people (mostly older and sicker people)
And
b) 60% of all deaths come from 25% of all people (mostly younger and healthier people)
Which group of people is significantly more protected from deaths
Signed,
Your high school freshman math teacher
^^^^^^^loser that can't admit he's wrong.The only thing he was incorrect in was not capitalizing "dumb twat bitch." That's a proper noun/title when it comes to you.
Now, I'm off to a party with the wife and I'll probably be watching some football. Enjoy your only contact of the day, which is probably the pizza dude who's due at any minute.
^^^ big mad.^^^^^^^^loser whose wife left him because he's a loser and now he's celibate and a bigger loser, while she's moved on.
Don't forget to tip the pizza dude. Maybe you can invite him in and tell him what a loser you are.
Later, loser. We gone.