Clinton/Uranium 1 Bribes

[NinjaKnight]

Figured this is such a big deal it deserves its own thread.

It's public knowledge that Kazahkstan is the #1 producer of Uranium in the world, so kind of strange that the Russians would do shady shit to get ours. But obviously the Clintons will do absolutely anything for money/power, and they received $2.35 million from the former Uranium 1 CEO which was not publicly disclosed by the Clintons (even shadier).

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

Snopes claims the timing doesn't add up as far as the donation/approval timeline, but doesn't provide an explanation for why they donated $145 million.

 

[KnighttimeJoe]

LOLOLOLOL. Snopes. Fake site. They have had know for years than you would now.

Sincerely,

Sir Gal

 

[btbones]

Why people from either side just look up snopes or similar sites and take their opinion verbatim is beyond my comprehension . They can pick and choose info just like every or else

 

[UCFKnight85]

I raised this last year and was told I was just a right wing conspiracy theorist. It’s amazing that this story has been in plain sight for a long time yet only now the MSM is actually reporting it

 

[Bob the Citronaut]

The vast right wing conspiracy is at it again. Why won't all you sexist just leave Hillary alone?

 

[UCFKnight85]

The vast right wing conspiracy is at it again. Why won't all you sexist just leave Hillary alone?

She only lost becuase of SEXISM!!

 

[Poolside Knight]

Sean Hannity found his next 6 months of programming to shift attention away from the actual sitting President having a 38% Approval Rating in a Fox News Poll

 

[btbones]

Sean Hannity found his next 6 months of programming to shift attention away from the actual sitting President having a 38% Approval Rating in a Fox News Poll

Your response is Sad !

 

[Bob the Citronaut]

Sean Hannity found his next 6 months of programming to shift attention away from the actual sitting President having a 38% Approval Rating in a Fox News Poll

Polls are FAKE NEWS!

 

[UCFKnight85]

I've never once been involved in a Presidential Approval ratings poll.

They're absolutely correct all the time.

 

[CommuterBob]

While the deal is shady, the whole claim of "the Russians got 20% of our uranium" is really a misnomer. The uranium can't leave the country by law and the contracts are to extract the uranium for shipment within the US. Yes, Rosatom is a Russian company, but they also do uranium mining all around the world. Saying we gave 20% of our uranium to Russia is like saying we gave 50% of our beer to Belgium when InBev bought Anheuser-Busch.

That said, Clinton is shady as hell. There are still questions about their foundation, which has been alleged to be corrupt as hell.

 

[UCFKnight85]

While the deal is shady, the whole claim of "the Russians got 20% of our uranium" is really a misnomer. The uranium can't leave the country by law and the contracts are to extract the uranium for shipment within the US. Yes, Rosatom is a Russian company, but they also do uranium mining all around the world. Saying we gave 20% of our uranium to Russia is like saying we gave 50% of our beer to Belgium when InBev bought Anheuser-Busch.

That said, Clinton is shady as hell. There are still questions about their foundation, which has been alleged to be corrupt as hell.

SMH. Are you being serious right now?

Uranium is not BEER. It's a goddamn VITAL national security resource. And excuse me while I laugh at this attempt to downplay the effort to send uranium to THE RUSSIANS. You know, the people that folks like you have been insisting I must freak out over when it involves unconfirmed rumors about Trump.

That's the funny thing here. The Russians get some morons to run fake news ads and hack an idiot at the DNC and it's "equal to 9/11" (actual quote from a Dem). Meanwhile, their de facto Czar of the party for the past 30 years is involved in a bribery deal to send uranium to Russia and it's "NO BIG DEAL!"

 

[NinjaKnight]

I've never once been involved in a Presidential Approval ratings poll.

They're absolutely correct all the time.

http://bfy.tw/EhLf

 

[UCFKnight85]

http://bfy.tw/EhLf

lol the funny thing is that I'm sure, without a doubt, you were posting dickish stuff like this on November 7th 2016 to anyone suggesting Trump could win.

 

[Bob the Citronaut]

While the deal is shady, the whole claim of "the Russians got 20% of our uranium" is really a misnomer. The uranium can't leave the country by law and the contracts are to extract the uranium for shipment within the US. Yes, Rosatom is a Russian company, but they also do uranium mining all around the world. Saying we gave 20% of our uranium to Russia is like saying we gave 50% of our beer to Belgium when InBev bought Anheuser-Busch.

That said, Clinton is shady as hell. There are still questions about their foundation, which has been alleged to be corrupt as hell.

Roflcopter.

 

[NinjaKnight]

SMH. Are you being serious right now?

Uranium is not BEER. It's a goddamn VITAL national security resource. And excuse me while I laugh at this attempt to downplay the effort to send uranium to THE RUSSIANS. You know, the people that folks like you have been insisting I must freak out over when it involves unconfirmed rumors about Trump.

That's the funny thing here. The Russians get some morons to run fake news ads and hack an idiot at the DNC and it's "equal to 9/11" (actual quote from a Dem). Meanwhile, their de facto Czar of the party for the past 30 years is involved in a bribery deal to send uranium to Russia and it's "NO BIG DEAL!"

lol chill on the bro rage, he is correct.

The Russians don't need our uranium, they have plenty. This deal does not send them uranium. You are flat out wrong there.

The illegal part is the donations, and non disclosure. Bro rage over that if you must, but at least get your facts straight.


From The Nuclear Regulatory Committee:
NRC’s review of the transfer of control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will
remain the licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize danger to life or property. The review also determined that the licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.

source: https://web.archive.org/web/2017012...ading-rm/doc-collections/news/2010/10-211.pdf

 

[NinjaKnight]

Roflcopter.

@CommuterBob looks like you caught another idiot.

@Bob the Knight see my post above if you'd like to actually learn something. Who knows maybe in a couple weeks you will be educating people on this same topic just like when I taught you about the 1st ammendment

 

[UCFKnight85]

lol chill on the bro rage, he is correct.

The Russians don't need our uranium, they have plenty. This deal does not send them uranium. You are flat out wrong there.

The illegal part is the donations, and non disclosure. Bro rage over that if you must, but at least get your facts straight.


From The Nuclear Regulatory Committee:
NRC’s review of the transfer of control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will
remain the licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize danger to life or property. The review also determined that the licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.

source: https://web.archive.org/web/2017012...ading-rm/doc-collections/news/2010/10-211.pdf

Yes, because export licenses are always respected amongst rogue regimes*

 

[NinjaKnight]

Yes, because export licenses are always respected amongst rogue regimes*

lol this is like the Betsy Devoss "muh freedom of speech" debacle for you and bob all over again. Just stop while you are only slightly behind, admit you were wrong, and move on.

 

[CommuterBob]

SMH. Are you being serious right now?

Uranium is not BEER. It's a goddamn VITAL national security resource. And excuse me while I laugh at this attempt to downplay the effort to send uranium to THE RUSSIANS. You know, the people that folks like you have been insisting I must freak out over when it involves unconfirmed rumors about Trump.

That's the funny thing here. The Russians get some morons to run fake news ads and hack an idiot at the DNC and it's "equal to 9/11" (actual quote from a Dem). Meanwhile, their de facto Czar of the party for the past 30 years is involved in a bribery deal to send uranium to Russia and it's "NO BIG DEAL!"

You fall for the narrative hook, line, and sinker. Uranium mined in the US cannot be sent to Russia by law without approval of the US DoE - exactly because it's a national security resource. Besides, the US is a net importer of uranium and guess where we get most of ours? Canada, Kazakhstan. Australia, and Russia. The US imports more uranium from Russia than the US exports to the entire world. Rosatom is an operator, plain and simple. So yes, the beer analogy is apropos. It's a foreign entity contracted to mine uranium in the US, to bring to market.

 

[btbones]

lol this is like the Betsy Devoss "muh freedom of speech" debacle for you and bob all over again. Just stop while you are only slightly behind, admit you were wrong, and move on.

You don't even have the respect to spell her name right .

 

[UCFKnight85]

You fall for the narrative hook, line, and sinker. Uranium mined in the US cannot be sent to Russia by law without approval of the US DoE - exactly because it's a national security resource. Besides, the US is a net importer of uranium and guess where we get most of ours? Canada, Kazakhstan. Australia, and Russia. The US imports more uranium from Russia than the US exports to the entire world. Rosatom is an operator, plain and simple. So yes, the beer analogy is apropos. It's a foreign entity contracted to mine uranium in the US, to bring to market.

I thought Russia was our mortal enemy? Why would we EVER sell them uranium? Or buy theirs?

I am confused. You'll have to tell me when I must declare them our mortal enemy, or declare them a JV league country that we need to re-set with

 

[btbones]

I’d love to see the folks who kept screaming about Russian collusion start screaming about it being with crooked Hillary .

 

[Bob the Citronaut]

You fall for the narrative hook, line, and sinker. Uranium mined in the US cannot be sent to Russia by law without approval of the US DoE - exactly because it's a national security resource. Besides, the US is a net importer of uranium and guess where we get most of ours? Canada, Kazakhstan. Australia, and Russia. The US imports more uranium from Russia than the US exports to the entire world. Rosatom is an operator, plain and simple. So yes, the beer analogy is apropos. It's a foreign entity contracted to mine uranium in the US, to bring to market.

So how is Wikileaks any different. They aren't the Russian government yet everyone is RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA PUTIN PUTIN PUTIN!!!

 

[NinjaKnight]

You don't even have the respect to spell her name right .

I thought Russia was our mortal enemy? Why would we EVER sell them uranium? Or buy theirs?

I am confused. You'll have to tell me when I must declare them our mortal enemy, or declare them a JV league country that we need to re-set with

DEFLECT DEFLECT DEFLECT!

Stay on topic, you were wrong, you got called out, man up and admit it and move on.

I’d love to see the folks who kept screaming about Russian collusion start screaming about it being with crooked Hillary .

If only someone would have started a thread about it, that you could post that exact same question in...oh wait.

 

[CommuterBob]

I thought Russia was our mortal enemy? Why would we EVER sell them uranium? Or buy theirs?

I am confused. You'll have to tell me when I must declare them our mortal enemy, or declare them a JV league country that we need to re-set with

I'm glad to see you coming to terms with the concept that you can't think for yourself. You can learn, though.

 

[btbones]

DEFLECT DEFLECT DEFLECT!

Stay on topic, you were wrong, you got called out, man up and admit it and move on.



If only someone would have started a thread about it, that you could post that exact same question in...oh wait.

Your thread tried but fell short of the mark

 

[UCFKnight85]

I'm glad to see you coming to terms with the concept that you can't think for yourself. You can learn, though.

LOL

What I see is you and Ninja, yet again, deflecting away from a story in blind hatred for Trump

Reminder: you were amongst the people shitting on this story when I raised it last year

 

[CommuterBob]

LOL

What I see is you and Ninja, yet again, deflecting away from a story in blind hatred for Trump

Reminder: you were amongst the people shitting on this story when I raised it last year

A - I didn't bring up Trump at all ITT - he's totally irrelevant to this story
B - I called out HRC for being shady then AND now.
C - I called out this deal as being far less of an OMG than it's made out to be then AND now.
D - It's still a story worth shitting on, because in the end, it means exactly nothing as far as a threat to national security or even our own uranium production.

If you want to scare yourself into a tizzy over this story, go right ahead. All I'm saying is that this shady deal isn't the big national security nightmare Fox News and The Blaze make it out to be.

 

[Bob the Citronaut]

A - I didn't bring up Trump at all ITT - he's totally irrelevant to this story
B - I called out HRC for being shady then AND now.
C - I called out this deal as being far less of an OMG than it's made out to be then AND now.
D - It's still a story worth shitting on, because in the end, it means exactly nothing as far as a threat to national security or even our own uranium production.

If you want to scare yourself into a tizzy over this story, go right ahead. All I'm saying is that this shady deal isn't the big national security nightmare Fox News and The Blaze make it out to be.

So a story about Clinton being bribed with $145M is no big deal? Roflcopter.

 

[btbones]

So a story about Clinton being bribed with $145M is no big deal? Roflcopter.

Pfft

 

[CommuterBob]

So a story about Clinton being bribed with $145M is no big deal? Roflcopter.

Did I say that? No. I said HRC is shady and the deal is shady. Good Lord. Learn to read.

 

[UCFKnight85]

A - I didn't bring up Trump at all ITT - he's totally irrelevant to this story
B - I called out HRC for being shady then AND now.
C - I called out this deal as being far less of an OMG than it's made out to be then AND now.
D - It's still a story worth shitting on, because in the end, it means exactly nothing as far as a threat to national security or even our own uranium production.

If you want to scare yourself into a tizzy over this story, go right ahead. All I'm saying is that this shady deal isn't the big national security nightmare Fox News and The Blaze make it out to be.

I look forward to your next post in hysterics over some irrelevant RUSSIA! bit when involving Trump.

We know it's coming from you.

 

[CommuterBob]

I look forward to your next post in hysterics over some irrelevant RUSSIA! bit when involving Trump.

We know it's coming from you.

Yep, you found it. I'm inventing the RUSSIA! stories. It's all me. I'm an international web of reporters and anonymous sources. You figured it out.

As for hysterics. Few people on this board can match the hysterics you produce on an hourly basis.

 

[NinjaKnight]

Did I say that? No. I said HRC is shady and the deal is shady. Good Lord. Learn to read.

I know it's not nice to use the "r" word, but holy fuking hell these people on here are stupid. Zero reading comprehension.

 

[NinjaKnight]

LOL

What I see is you and Ninja, yet again, deflecting away from a story in blind hatred for Trump

Reminder: you were amongst the people shitting on this story when I raised it last year

I started this thread! I called HRC shady as hell! I did not shit on this story last year! FFS man you really are not that bright. Literally everything you post is wrong.

 

[Bob the Citronaut]

Did I say that? No. I said HRC is shady and the deal is shady. Good Lord. Learn to read.

It's still a story worth shitting on, because in the end, it means exactly nothing as far as a threat to national security or even our own uranium production.

 

[CommuterBob]

quotes

You're parsing my words. Wrong.

 

[NinjaKnight]

Your thread tried but fell short of the mark

What mark? It exposed that evidently you Trump nut huggers have the reading comprehension of a toothpick and have no idea what this story actually meant. It shows that literally everyone thinks HRC is shady as fuk but you three little musketeers somehow can't comprehend the fact that people can think HRC and Trump would both be terrible presidents.

Sad*

 

[UCFWayne]

So a story about Clinton being bribed with $145M is no big deal? Roflcopter.

im sure that no uranium was going to be exchanged because of that money...