I think we've all gotten spoiled with expectations and performance, and we've kinda overlooked the tendency of good coaches improving year 1 to year 2.
GOL: 2004, 0-11 --> 2005, 8-5
CSF: 2016, 6-7 --> 2017, 13-0
CJH: 2018, 12-1 --> 2019, ?-?
Heupel is a first year head coach. Unless he is some savant coaching prodigy, there were some lessons learned from year 1 that he brings to year 2... or maybe he was gifted a talented roster and only had to put it on cruise to manage double digit wins...
I think we see Randy Shannon's defense really start take shape, the DL will be the surprise unit on the team. Heupel's play calling has been immaculate thus far (see UCF-Memphis part 1).
Where does coaching and play calling improve year 1 to year 2?
GOL: 2004, 0-11 --> 2005, 8-5
CSF: 2016, 6-7 --> 2017, 13-0
CJH: 2018, 12-1 --> 2019, ?-?
Heupel is a first year head coach. Unless he is some savant coaching prodigy, there were some lessons learned from year 1 that he brings to year 2... or maybe he was gifted a talented roster and only had to put it on cruise to manage double digit wins...
I think we see Randy Shannon's defense really start take shape, the DL will be the surprise unit on the team. Heupel's play calling has been immaculate thus far (see UCF-Memphis part 1).
Where does coaching and play calling improve year 1 to year 2?
