I have not posted here in a while, used to on occasion a couple years ago.
You guys had a great year. Amazing, amazing turn around from 2 years ago.
I don't know how I feel about claiming a national championship yet. I like it in ways, and don't like it in other ways, but you don't need my approval, so my peace with it is irrelevant.
I will say that I have heard blowhards making the argument since your title announcement that you didn't play a power 5 schedule, blah, blah, blah.
To me that is the weakest argument they have. It isn't like UCF had a chance to join a power 5 conference and turned it down and said no thanks we would rather face UConn instead of Alabama. We all know UCF would take the field against any team in the country today if given the chance. UCF has not ducked anyone.
And you can't hold their conference schedule against them if you are refusing to allow them to join.
One thing I do hope comes about with the "controversy" of you guys claiming a championship is that it forces an expansion of the playoffs to 8 teams.
I say 8 teams because we all know, even if we don't agree with it, that those in charge of college football are only going to relinquish so much power.
I think the most realistic shot at expanding is to go to 8 teams, each power 5 champion gets an automatic bid, and have three wildcard spots. Make one wildcard spot designated for the highest rated group of five champion, and the other two would go to the two highest rated (most likely power 5) teams that are not conference champions - essentially meaning the remaining two wild cards would have to finish being ranked in the top 8 to qualify for the playoffs.
They could continue to utilize the committee to seed/rank the teams. And ultimately they would be responsible for deciding at least two wildcard teams getting into the playoff.
If the power brokers could not come to terms or have peace with the highest rated group of 5 team automatically getting into the playoffs, then they could set a minimum standard, I suppose, like the BCS had. For example the group of five team had to finish ranked in the top 12, or top 8, or whatever.
The people that control college football are never going to ensure the field is level for all, but they should be made to at least make a path for access to the playoffs for all.
Anyway, just my worthless opinion. Again, congrats on a great season.
You guys had a great year. Amazing, amazing turn around from 2 years ago.
I don't know how I feel about claiming a national championship yet. I like it in ways, and don't like it in other ways, but you don't need my approval, so my peace with it is irrelevant.
I will say that I have heard blowhards making the argument since your title announcement that you didn't play a power 5 schedule, blah, blah, blah.
To me that is the weakest argument they have. It isn't like UCF had a chance to join a power 5 conference and turned it down and said no thanks we would rather face UConn instead of Alabama. We all know UCF would take the field against any team in the country today if given the chance. UCF has not ducked anyone.
And you can't hold their conference schedule against them if you are refusing to allow them to join.
One thing I do hope comes about with the "controversy" of you guys claiming a championship is that it forces an expansion of the playoffs to 8 teams.
I say 8 teams because we all know, even if we don't agree with it, that those in charge of college football are only going to relinquish so much power.
I think the most realistic shot at expanding is to go to 8 teams, each power 5 champion gets an automatic bid, and have three wildcard spots. Make one wildcard spot designated for the highest rated group of five champion, and the other two would go to the two highest rated (most likely power 5) teams that are not conference champions - essentially meaning the remaining two wild cards would have to finish being ranked in the top 8 to qualify for the playoffs.
They could continue to utilize the committee to seed/rank the teams. And ultimately they would be responsible for deciding at least two wildcard teams getting into the playoff.
If the power brokers could not come to terms or have peace with the highest rated group of 5 team automatically getting into the playoffs, then they could set a minimum standard, I suppose, like the BCS had. For example the group of five team had to finish ranked in the top 12, or top 8, or whatever.
The people that control college football are never going to ensure the field is level for all, but they should be made to at least make a path for access to the playoffs for all.
Anyway, just my worthless opinion. Again, congrats on a great season.