But honestly your trope of (((MSM))) is getting really tired.
Do I sound any different than Bernie Sanders? Seriously. Sanders has also been lambasting the Progressives and DNC on these points, among others too.
Whenever a celeb or major politician cheats on their significant other, the media runs the stories because they are salacious.
Yes. But in the case of Trump, accusations were flying about him paying hush money and other things, and how that would be illegal. Many analysts in the MSM never retracted those statements.
I've been in and out of a lot of airports, especially DC and elsewhere, where CNN and MSBNC are common. It's amazing how many analysts are allowed on TV that spew such non-sense.
And yes, Fox News has plenty of analysts that do the same as well. But at some point, we're getting 90% of it one way, especially as Fox's ratings continue to slip.
They don't ever equate cheating on a spouse with violation of a law unless there is an actual reason to do so.
Sorry, no, in the case of Trump, they very much did. They went there as soon as the Daniels story broke.
Remember how much the media covered the mayor of Nashville? that played up pretty well given her relatively low-on-the-totem-pole status as a politician. And she IS under investigation, as has been covered.
In the south, yes. Not very well elsewhere.
But it's a tiring and old scapegoat to say (((MSM))) or the (((SOROS-led MSM))) ONLY goes after conservative/republican politicians and tries to convict them in the court of public opinion!
I don't go around saying "Soros," but there are plenty of people I know who go on and on about the "Koch brothers."
Most of us Libertarians had to endure the BS that Gary Johnson was a Koch plant, which was not only an ad run by a HRC/DNC-controlled, $50M SuperPAC (10x the Libertarian budget) in 10 states where HRC and the DNC feared they no one would reach 270 votes, but the celebrities who the MSM paraded out "for free." Why? Because in addition to the 270 fear, 70% of Americans wanted a 3rd party in the debates. It worked.
Sorry, but the MSM is completely at the hands of the DNC, who also controlled the anti-Johnson SuperPAC. Reason.COM gave us the "play-by-play" some 3 weeks before it happened. It was the first time we Libertarians were exposed to the DNC's 'control' as 2016 was the first time weren't puling 3x as many Republicans and Democrats (which is why the DNC liked us, like the Russians, before the 2016 election), as we had dealt with the GOP in years past (but never to that level, our first exposure to the DNC's "control" of the MSM).
Much of the press industry has been sitting on these dirty realities ...
A) A lot is outsourced, especially at CNN, but also NBC. So they cannot control various entities that side with other parties, who violate their own neutrality standards.
B) You have to be a registered Democratic party member or it's career suicide, especially in places like DC. That's why most Fox anchors are registered Democratic party too.
