http://www.orlandosentinel.com/spor...-key-offensive-coordinator-20151005-post.html
IMHO....this is dead on accurate!
IMHO....this is dead on accurate!
I'd luv to have Kruz calling plays! He was a mastermind at play calling!Agreed. At this point I'd even be willing to take a chance of Kruczek. At least it was way more exciting to see!
I'd luv to have Kruz calling plays! He was a mastermind at play calling!![]()
I didn't quite call him a mastermind. but sure as heck coach K was more exciting than run, run, pass (fail), punt, repeat.
Miserably. Who should take the blame? I say the players.I think Bianchi hit it on the head though. Having Key as the OC was not good. But that is hindsight. You wont know until you give someone the chance. The great Brent Key experiment seems to be a fail
Miserably. Who should take the blame? I say the players.
This is what scares me (bolded).Why does there need to be blame? you make a decision and you live by it. sometimes it works and other times it does not. I remember people calling for Charlie Taafe's job in 2011. But luckily he was retained. Now that he is gone he is a hero
Why does there need to be blame? you make a decision and you live by it. sometimes it works and other times it does not. I remember people calling for Charlie Taafe's job in 2011. But luckily he was retained. Now that he is gone he is a hero
And you guys are the people who want to fire someone 2-4 weeks after you hire them. You honestly don't know what someone is or isn't capable of until you give them at least 90-180 days.Someone is always to blame for disaster. I see that you are the kind of person who doesn't believe in accountability.
He was a really great 1-AA offensive coordinator. He did a lot with a little. He did it by spreading it around when others were not doing that. If he was really as good as you say he would have landed somewhere else by now.
Bring back Coach K. He was far, far more exciting than GoL. Honestly, I'm being 100% truthful. He was.Didn't say he was good. He was more EXCITING to watch. If we're going to lose, I rather it'd be at least an exciting game!
And you guys are the people who want to fire someone 2-4 weeks after you hire them. You honestly don't know what someone is or isn't capable of until you give them at least 90-180 days.
Especially when they enter under circumstances that are limiting, and only get worse.
Yes, but you still give them at least up to just before that 90 days. You don't fire them after a couple of weeks.After 90 days you are paying unemployment so you better evaluate fast.
And if we change everything now? What guarantee do we have we don't make it worse?I believe that the fact that after a year and a half we find ourselves arguing amongst each other about on field results rather than what color helmet we should wear is a very telling sign. I'm afraid this will take years to fix. Years.
Are you referring to his top-notch 36-30 overall record, or his 8-6 conference record?I'd luv to have Kruz calling plays! He was a mastermind at play calling!![]()
And that's the thing. GoL could have a median 8-4 record (6-2 in-conference) at UCF ... say starting from 2007 on-ward (most kids recruited under his tenure), and people will still hate his system. They want innovative offenses like Coach K was brilliant at.Are you referring to his top-notch 36-30 overall record, or his 8-6 conference record?
There was nothing very exciting about watching the team regularly implode in the 3rd or 4th quarter of most games....especially out-of-conference games. He's so innovative and cutting edge that he is coaching high school ball at Trinity Prep. Not ragging on the gig because coaching high school kids is an admirable job but from a career perspective a guy that was once a head coach at the college level, and a coordinstor in the NFL, doesn't tell me his talents are in high demand.Didn't say he was good. He was more EXCITING to watch. If we're going to lose, I rather it'd be at least an exciting game!
There was nothing very exciting about watching the team regularly implode in the 3rd or 4th quarter of most games....especially out-of-conference games. He's so innovative and cutting edge that he is coaching high school ball at Trinity Prep. Not ragging on the gig because coaching high school kids is an admirable job but from a career perspective a guy that was once a head coach at the college level, and a coordinstor in the NFL, doesn't tell me his talents are in high demand.
This is what scares me (bolded).
So while I really dislike the results of coaching right now ... I still have to recognize that it could be really simple. Key is literally having learning and execution issues with the combination of experience and talent he has to work with, and that's why we're seeing some simplified, even cringing, repeats of non-sense. Because he has little other choice.
Every time we seem to open up the playbook, there's a 75% chance we'll have a turnover.
Kruz had no facilities, etc. I understand he was not a good head coach and went downhill. but, he was an excellent OC, when he was an OC.Are you referring to his top-notch 36-30 overall record, or his 8-6 conference record?
The guarantee is the guarantee to stay as-is and continue being Mediocre. We cannot turn the corner with GOL. It's been proven.And if we change everything now? What guarantee do we have we don't make it worse?
If we're sucking bad through several games next year, regardless of whether Key is let go or moved from the OC this year, I'll be all for GoL getting canned. He's never had back-to-back losing seasons, which is usually what gets coaches fired (other than constant mediocrity after 3-4 years).
But I'm still scared about what kind of message you guys would send to a new coach by firing a coach just a couple of games after 3 straight divisional or conference championships (and 4 out of the last 5).
Kruz had no facilites, little budget, but couldnt game plan and end up in shootouts where our athletes wear out.Kruz had no facilities, etc. I understand he was not a good head coach and went downhill. but, he was an excellent OC, when he was an OC.
Kruz had no facilities, etc. I understand he was not a good head coach and went downhill. but, he was an excellent OC, when he was an OC.
The Wikipedia tells me that Kruz will have a better winning percentage than GOL in 3 more games.
Current stats:
Krucez's winning percentage with no facilities at UCF: 54..54%
O'Leary's winning percentage with tons of facilities at UCF: 55.48%