ADVERTISEMENT

George O'Leary on Open Mike Tomorrow

OpenMikeRadio

Four-Star Recruit
Aug 21, 2013
118
1
18
Knights Fans,

Tomorrow morning around 7:30 am, Interim Athletic Director George O'Leary will join Open Mike with Mike Bianchi on 740 The Game to talk about the UCF Athletic Department moving forward.

If you have any questions for Coach O'Leary, please leave them below and I will get them to Mike.

To hear the interview, tune to 740 on your AM dial, or 101.1 HD-2 on your HD radio. You can also stream us live online here.
 
Is it conceivable that Florida ACC and SEC schools would work behind the scenes to prevent UCF from joining a 3rd P5 conference so as to prevent recruiting competition and/or diluting TV market share?
 
Time for the local media to lob some softball questions at GOL to set him up for positive expansion talk. Florida has 7.6 million TV households. For Tier 3 (conference network purposes) that would increase the existing B12 footprint by 66%. How can the B12 afford NOT to expand and increase the Tier 3 income for everyone but Texas?
 
Are there any current plans to increase the seating capacity of the football stadium? It was floated by UCF when stadium was first built that we could
add another approx. 10,000 seats. Will there be more construction after
ESC is done? This would help with Big 12 consideration.
 
Was Standbury's departure expected or was it a total shock to UCF? In other words, was the school blindsided?
 
What's your golf score these days?
Is Coach Key the coach in waiting?
How will the new Student Academic building impact the student athletes?
What NFL rules would you want brought over to college football?
What's the status of the planned UCF Football facility?
How can UCF fans support getting UCF into the P5?
 
Thanks! Good interview from George. Seems like O'Leary is getting more and more relaxed / laid back being interviewed by Bianchi. It's nice to see him let his guard down a little bit.
 
Time for the local media to lob some softball questions at GOL to set him up for positive expansion talk. Florida has 7.6 million TV households. For Tier 3 (conference network purposes) that would increase the existing B12 footprint by 66%. How can the B12 afford NOT to expand and increase the Tier 3 income for everyone but Texas?
Most of those TV's dont watch college football...and most of the ones that do, don't watch UCF Football. You guys put too much stock into potential viewers. Outside of Central Florida, UCF games go unwatched because they are on Thursday nights oppisite NFL, at noon while people are doing yardwork or errands or furthermore on a network other than ESPN that doesn't get the channel surfer watching either . If the game is same time as any other Big 3 Florida school, forget it.
 
Most of those TV's dont watch college football...and most of the ones that do, don't watch UCF Football. You guys put too much stock into potential viewers. Outside of Central Florida, UCF games go unwatched because they are on Thursday nights oppisite NFL, at noon while people are doing yardwork or errands or furthermore on a network other than ESPN that doesn't get the channel surfer watching either . If the game is same time as any other Big 3 Florida school, forget it.
It doesn't matter how many people would watch UCF, it's about creating a tipping point to get a FL cable provider to carry a B12 network. Would UCF in the Big12 get BHN to carry a Big12 network as part of a sports package? I think definitely.
 
Most of those TV's dont watch college football...and most of the ones that do, don't watch UCF Football. You guys put too much stock into potential viewers. Outside of Central Florida, UCF games go unwatched because they are on Thursday nights oppisite NFL, at noon while people are doing yardwork or errands or furthermore on a network other than ESPN that doesn't get the channel surfer watching either . If the game is same time as any other Big 3 Florida school, forget it.

SublimeKnight already responded with the basics. But just to emphasize the point, EVERY cable/satellite subscriber in an "in-market" state contributes to the revenue of a conference network. For example, because of Texas A&M the SEC network gets paid around $1.45 per month for every cable/satellite subscriber in Texas...even if those subscribers are primarily fans of Texas, Texas Tech, Baylor, TCU, Houston, SMU, UTEP, North Texas, UTSA, etc.
 
It doesn't matter how many people would watch UCF, it's about creating a tipping point to get a FL cable provider to carry a B12 network. Would UCF in the Big12 get BHN to carry a Big12 network as part of a sports package? I think definitely.
I live in South Florida and get Pac12, B1G Stations...having a team in Florida doesn't seem to be a prerequisite...If its part of a sports package...you will only get paid per package bought. Not every single basic package subscriber.
 
I live in South Florida and get Pac12, B1G Stations...having a team in Florida doesn't seem to be a prerequisite...If its part of a sports package...you will only get paid per package bought. Not every single basic package subscriber.
No it doesn't, but it certainly helps. The B1G Network is in a lot of areas because they have a lot of huge, well established universities in it. Ohio State, Penn State, Michigan, all have tons and tons of alums and tshirt fans that live around the country. University of Texas has a similar level of a national fanbase as Ohio State, yet they can't even get the LHN to be carried by Comcast in Houston.
If the LHN dissolved and instead there was a B12 network, would Comcast carry that in Houston? Probably, because now Comcast is looking at a network that appeals to Texas, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, etc fans. That cumulative support is what gets it there. The end result is a difference between getting $0 from Comcast and $1-$2/mo per sports package sub from Comcast, not just the incremental value brought by Texas Tech, Oklahoma, etc.
Does Brighthouse in Orlando carry the LHN? No. Would Brighthouse in Orlando carry a B12 network? Probably not. What if UCF is added? Probably. Adding UCF also helps their case in South Florida and Tampa. UCF on it's own might not sell the network to Time Warner Tampa, but like I said, it's about creating a tipping point. Texas is a national brand, Oklahoma is a lesser national brand, K-State a step down from there. They won't be as successful as the B1G or SEC network, its just not in the cards, but a B12 network with the right additions could maximize their potential by getting them into a few lucrative contracts they're just shy of getting today.
 
just adding this thought which may not be a major selling point but has to at least help.

When we made our run in 2013, we did have a national audience. I've seen those viewer numbers posted a few times in the past but we carried Orlando with better viewership than UF and there was also viewership in our rival's cities (Louisville, Cincinnati, Houston, etc). Yes, we had many Thursday/Friday games but they were national TV exposure games that were actually watched nationally.

So when we are good, the numbers support it. When we aren't, we carry Central Florida.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT