Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes.Originally posted by chemmie:
Are we allowed to call Zimmerman a "thug" now, after multiple violent arrests? Or, is that term reserved for the black kid who died?
This post was edited on 1/10 11:03 AM by chemmie
Yea, yea, yea... the usual racists around here were calling the light-pigmented guy a "thug" the whole time!!! I forgot.Originally posted by C-MontCityKnight2:
Hey you fat piece of goo, we've been calling him a thug since day one. Doesn't change that fact that he had the right to defend himself.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
That's because you're smarter than most of the people around here.Originally posted by UCFEE:
I don't understand how anyone can defend Zimmerman's actions in... the guy followed an unarmed kid with a gun, if anything Trevon was exercising self defense against this fcking creep. Now we're seeing him act like an aggressive POS over and over again. Will not surprise me if he kills again.
The case was an abortion of justice on the scale of OJ.
Or, you could dig up an unbiased analysis of the trial and fix your ignorance. Just because you don't like the guy and don't agree with the trial outcome based upon your faith in flawed narratives and incomplete understanding of the facts, evidence, and law, doesn't mean that justice wasn't done in that one incident.Originally posted by UCFEE:
I don't understand how anyone can defend Zimmerman's actions in... the guy followed an unarmed kid with a gun, if anything Trevon was exercising self defense against this fcking creep. Now we're seeing him act like an aggressive POS over and over again. Will not surprise me if he kills again.
The case was an abortion of justice on the scale of OJ.
Hold on, if Zimmerman had more capacity to kill at a distance (either with his gun or with his car) than Treyvon had even within close range, then why is initiating a physical confrontation not self defense?Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
Apparently you're not aware of the facts since everything you've said points to this. Just like chemmie, who has spent his entire time on this board spewing bullshit with no idea of what he's talking about.
Whether or not Zimmerman "should have" been following Martin is up to you to decide. I really don't care. I care about what exactly happened that led to the gunshot wound which killed Martin.
And the facts in the case, as laid out during court testimony, as heard by the jury who judged him Not Guilty, said this: that Zimmerman had stopped his pursuit of Martin, did not know where he went, and was turned around when Martin essentially ambushed him and started beating the shit out of him. It was also reveled, in actual court testimony, that Martin did NOT know that Zimmerman had a firearm and therefore this played no role in Martin's decision to assault Zimmerman.
Therefore your line "feared for his life because some asshole with a gun was following him around' is absurd and based in ignorance and lies.
So again: Zimmerman, whether an asshole for following the kid or not, did NOT initiate the physical altercation and witness testimony confirmed that he was on the ground, getting beat to shit by Martin who was on top, and who initiated the entire fight.
I don't care what Zimmerman is doing now. I only am commenting on the case which you commented on, and which chemmie so ignorantly comments on, and I've chosen to remind you of the facts. Let's see if you listen.
This post was edited on 1/11 12:13 PM by UCFKnight85
It's truly amazing how someone can choose to ignore facts as presented and invent their own facts, and continue with a false narrative.
Answer my questions or you lose.Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
It's truly amazing how someone can choose to ignore facts as presented and invent their own facts, and continue with a false narrative.
Where's the proof that he had a clear opportunity to get away? Point me to the fact of the case that showed Zimmerman had given up pursuit and was ambushed. That evidence doesn't exist. That's the false narrative you're choosing to believe.Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
lol
Question: if you have a clear opportunity to get away from someone that "you know" is armed, would you come back to jump them instead without a firearm yourself?
Your own logic is destroying your piss poor argument.
Next.
You don't know what you are talking about.Originally posted by UCFEE:
Hold on, if Zimmerman had more capacity to kill at a distance (either with his gun or with his car) than Treyvon had even within close range, then why is initiating a physical confrontation not self defense?Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
Apparently you're not aware of the facts since everything you've said points to this. Just like chemmie, who has spent his entire time on this board spewing bullshit with no idea of what he's talking about.
Whether or not Zimmerman "should have" been following Martin is up to you to decide. I really don't care. I care about what exactly happened that led to the gunshot wound which killed Martin.
And the facts in the case, as laid out during court testimony, as heard by the jury who judged him Not Guilty, said this: that Zimmerman had stopped his pursuit of Martin, did not know where he went, and was turned around when Martin essentially ambushed him and started beating the shit out of him. It was also reveled, in actual court testimony, that Martin did NOT know that Zimmerman had a firearm and therefore this played no role in Martin's decision to assault Zimmerman.
Therefore your line "feared for his life because some asshole with a gun was following him around' is absurd and based in ignorance and lies.
So again: Zimmerman, whether an asshole for following the kid or not, did NOT initiate the physical altercation and witness testimony confirmed that he was on the ground, getting beat to shit by Martin who was on top, and who initiated the entire fight.
I don't care what Zimmerman is doing now. I only am commenting on the case which you commented on, and which chemmie so ignorantly comments on, and I've chosen to remind you of the facts. Let's see if you listen.
This post was edited on 1/11 12:13 PM by UCFKnight85
And how the hell could anyone know if Martin knew he had a gun or not? And if everyone in the case couldn't even identify who was on top throwing the blows (the evidence they used to say Treyvon was the attacker was the fact that Zimmerman was screaming), how could they possibly have identified that Zimmerman turned around? Zimmerman's word? "Oh yeah, I was following him for several minutes, but I promise he attacked me only after I said 'oh nevermind'.
If I'm being followed for minutes by an unknown person, you be I'm going to assume he's armed. If some asshole is following you around aggressively, what are you going to think? If the asshole gets within striking distance of you, you're not going to defend yourself based on the fact YOU'VE been followed by someone who you do not know and do not know what his capabilities are to harm you? Even if you assume he doesn't have a gun, he's an adult with a truck, you're a kid.
The jury never heard the other side of the story because the kid's dead. The jury found this creep not guilty based on his word and his screams recorded on the phone. We see this guy continue to act like someone who should have been locked up....
But still, his killing of a kid is justified.
What a load of BS.
Which is why there is reasonable doubt that Zimmerman did anything.Originally posted by UCFEE:
...and we won't why why Trayvon took a left instead of a right because he's dead for throwing a few punches out of fear that this POS deserved to get.
You guys are pieces of work, I can't imagine the cognitive twists you have to go through to justify this killing. Zimmerman initiated the aggression, Zimmerman showed clear contempt for 'these fcking punks', Zimmerman pulled the trigger... but Zimmerman was justified because Martin didn't tuck his tail between his legs and go home... and how dare a black man react to being profiled given this nation's history.
.....says the guy arguing against actual facts, logic, and reasoning.Originally posted by UCFEE:
...and we won't why why Trayvon took a left instead of a right because he's dead for throwing a few punches out of fear that this POS deserved to get.
You guys are pieces of work, I can't imagine the cognitive twists you have to go through to justify this killing. Zimmerman initiated the aggression, Zimmerman showed clear contempt for 'these fcking punks', Zimmerman pulled the trigger... but Zimmerman was justified because Martin didn't tuck his tail between his legs and go home... and how dare a black man react to being profiled given this nation's history.
Martin was just a few yards from his father's back door and safety when he came back to attack Zimmerman. If he was truly that scared, why didn't he just take the shorter route home? There's also testimony in the case record that leads you to believe that Martin wasn't the scared little child that your erroneous narrative portrayed him as.Originally posted by UCFEE:
...and we won't why why Trayvon took a left instead of a right because he's dead for throwing a few punches out of fear that this POS deserved to get.
You guys are pieces of work, I can't imagine the cognitive twists you have to go through to justify this killing. Zimmerman initiated the aggression, Zimmerman showed clear contempt for 'these fcking punks', Zimmerman pulled the trigger... but Zimmerman was justified because Martin didn't tuck his tail between his legs and go home... and how dare a black man react to being profiled given this nation's history.
Not all engineers are butt hole stupid. Thanks for making us look bad EE...Originally posted by Bob the Knight:
I thought engineers were supposed to be smart... Seems all that pot is starting to take its toll.
Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
Apparently you're not aware of the facts since everything you've said points to this. Just like chemmie, who has spent his entire time on this board spewing bullshit with no idea of what he's talking about.
Whether or not Zimmerman "should have" been following Martin is up to you to decide. I really don't care. I care about what exactly happened that led to the gunshot wound which killed Martin.
And the facts in the case, as laid out during court testimony, as heard by the jury who judged him Not Guilty, said this: that Zimmerman had stopped his pursuit of Martin, did not know where he went, and was turned around when Martin essentially ambushed him and started beating the shit out of him. It was also reveled, in actual court testimony, that Martin did NOT know that Zimmerman had a firearm and therefore this played no role in Martin's decision to assault Zimmerman.
Therefore your line "feared for his life because some asshole with a gun was following him around' is absurd and based in ignorance and lies.
So again: Zimmerman, whether an asshole for following the kid or not, did NOT initiate the physical altercation and witness testimony confirmed that he was on the ground, getting beat to shit by Martin who was on top, and who initiated the entire fight.
I don't care what Zimmerman is doing now. I only am commenting on the case which you commented on, and which chemmie so ignorantly comments on, and I've chosen to remind you of the facts. Let's see if you listen.
"Fact" = people that disagree with you are racist and everything they do and say is racist.Originally posted by chemmie:
Originally posted by UCFKnight85:
Apparently you're not aware of the facts since everything you've said points to this. Just like chemmie, who has spent his entire time on this board spewing bullshit with no idea of what he's talking about.
Whether or not Zimmerman "should have" been following Martin is up to you to decide. I really don't care. I care about what exactly happened that led to the gunshot wound which killed Martin.
And the facts in the case, as laid out during court testimony, as heard by the jury who judged him Not Guilty, said this: that Zimmerman had stopped his pursuit of Martin, did not know where he went, and was turned around when Martin essentially ambushed him and started beating the shit out of him. It was also reveled, in actual court testimony, that Martin did NOT know that Zimmerman had a firearm and therefore this played no role in Martin's decision to assault Zimmerman.
Therefore your line "feared for his life because some asshole with a gun was following him around' is absurd and based in ignorance and lies.
So again: Zimmerman, whether an asshole for following the kid or not, did NOT initiate the physical altercation and witness testimony confirmed that he was on the ground, getting beat to shit by Martin who was on top, and who initiated the entire fight.
I don't care what Zimmerman is doing now. I only am commenting on the case which you commented on, and which chemmie so ignorantly comments on, and I've chosen to remind you of the facts. Let's see if you listen.
I don't think you understand what the word "fact" means.
Believe all they were doing was posting facts...and it was you that went all "emo" (jokingly calling shooting justified in another post...when that wasn't even the case for the jury to decide...they only had to decide if there was enough evidence WITHOUT A DOUBT to convict.Originally posted by UCFEE:
...and we won't why why Trayvon took a left instead of a right because he's dead for throwing a few punches out of fear that this POS deserved to get.
You guys are pieces of work, I can't imagine the cognitive twists you have to go through to justify this killing. Zimmerman initiated the aggression, Zimmerman showed clear contempt for 'these fcking punks', Zimmerman pulled the trigger... but Zimmerman was justified because Martin didn't tuck his tail between his legs and go home... and how dare a black man react to being profiled given this nation's history.