With the new hires, the haters and huggers are getting shuffled around. We need to identify who is on what side now. Please identify if you are a:
Frost Biter
or
Frost Licker
Frost Biter
or
Frost Licker
Haters vs Huggers
- Thread starter EngAlum98
- Start date
I'm just glad they got rid of O'Leary. I wouldve supported the next coach regardless but this is a good choice and im waiting to see who he brings with him.
#hugger
#hugger
Which is which? As a red-blooded male, I prefer
Just curious, which is which? As a red-blooded American male, I prefer to have things licked, especially if it involves my wife.
Just curious, which is which? As a red-blooded American male, I prefer to have things licked, especially if it involves my wife.
As a "red-blooded American male", you probably don't like it to be bitten. Some people on this board on the other hand.... well. LMAO
My biggest fears were ...
A) A lot of open HC positions were out there right now, not a good time to be searching, plus ...
B) We had the AD hire that had to happen first, compounding the delays, along with ...
C) A lot of waffling in general by the boosters and fanbase, looking like fools firing off suggestions
(e.g., "no huddle" -- lots of "I told you so's" all around as of late)
So ... just because some of us didn't like how GoL was treated and how he couldn't leave on his own terms, doesn't mean we're against all these moves. In fact, considering the AD+HC 'sweep' in record time, it really shows leadership.
We decided to go young, offense-oriented and had no problem picking a guy who is going to use us. If we're going to do that, let's do it ... and we did. That right there, execution, was solid! We went and got the best offensive candidate.
Now add in our last 2 recruiting classes, and our forthcoming 2 (maybe 1.5 since Scott won't have much time), and I see us really competing in 2017 or 2018 at the very latest. I'll be happy to go 0.500 next year, but after that, I want to be in the title games.
Scott will leave us 2018-2020, probably because he'll put us in a far better position. It will be interesting to see, but there was no "waffling." There was flat-out execution. We knew who we wanted, and we got them. That right there was very, very nice to see.
I'm a Frost Licker.
A) A lot of open HC positions were out there right now, not a good time to be searching, plus ...
B) We had the AD hire that had to happen first, compounding the delays, along with ...
C) A lot of waffling in general by the boosters and fanbase, looking like fools firing off suggestions
(e.g., "no huddle" -- lots of "I told you so's" all around as of late)
So ... just because some of us didn't like how GoL was treated and how he couldn't leave on his own terms, doesn't mean we're against all these moves. In fact, considering the AD+HC 'sweep' in record time, it really shows leadership.
We decided to go young, offense-oriented and had no problem picking a guy who is going to use us. If we're going to do that, let's do it ... and we did. That right there, execution, was solid! We went and got the best offensive candidate.
Now add in our last 2 recruiting classes, and our forthcoming 2 (maybe 1.5 since Scott won't have much time), and I see us really competing in 2017 or 2018 at the very latest. I'll be happy to go 0.500 next year, but after that, I want to be in the title games.
Scott will leave us 2018-2020, probably because he'll put us in a far better position. It will be interesting to see, but there was no "waffling." There was flat-out execution. We knew who we wanted, and we got them. That right there was very, very nice to see.
I'm a Frost Licker.
