For the 10,000th time spread is irrelevant.
The entire reason for mandates is to reduce the spread! That's literally the argument! Why are you for mandates then?
We have told you this for months.
And yet you're still pushing mandates.
Additionally, the spread is LESS IN THE VACCINATED. YOU HAVE SAID THIS YOURSELF IN MULTIPLE THREADS, so STOP LYING! IT’s a bad look for you to contradict YOURSELF
Stop being a 3rd grader!
The
spread with Delta (let alone Omicron) is the
same,
vaccinated or unvaccinated!
The
only thing I conceded is that overall
duration of disease may ultimately be reduced (infection may be the same though) because all vaccines are IgG-predominate in the blood, which prevents serious illness, which may reduce the duration -- although it does reduce the amount of IgA and IgM antibodies generated too.
That would explain why the secondary transmission,
over time --
not intensity -- can be up to 25% lower. Secondary transmission is actual spread, not
'antibody levels,' which Pharma loves to use, just like
'viral shedding' prior (which was proven to mean jack by the FDA).
If we just based it on
'antibody levels,' then people who recover and have natural immunity would be useless. But we're finding -- proven, statistically -- is those who recover have the least secondary tranmission of all, despite
'antibody levels.'
Welcome to full-on, 100% Pharma marketing Mikey! Do you understand why the FDA experts, who are no longer with the FDA, utterly crossed not only Pfizer's CEO, but also the President of the United States?!
Seriously ... this is sheep'ism 101.