Joels commitment to Christianity parallels my commitment to UCF Basketball.
-Donnie Jones
-Donnie Jones
.... but what are those priests doing with the alter boys behind closed doors???.........
Meanwhile the priests at my parish live in dorm type apartments in the attached clergy house.
He's a total fraud. His church claimed they were flooded and couldn't be used as a shelter (pictures showed they weren't flooded), but then said they'd be open as a distribution center, then later caved in to public pressure and opened up as a shelter for flood victims.
For those that like a good chuckle, there's a twitter account that replaces the word "God" with "your dick" in each one of Joel Osteen's tweets.
https://twitter.com/JoelDongsteen
Some are better than others.
It's my biggest criticisms of religions in general. "We're here to guide you and make you a better person which includes helping others" *Builds multi million dollar facility with donations*
How many foodbanks (or other facilities) could have been built and maintained with that money. There was a point in time where churches provided welfare for the country on donations, it's a shame those donations are now being used for avarice.
My post was certainly a sweeping generalization because there are religious groups that are very involved in their communities. I think it really comes down to the human element and who's running the respective church. Some seem to want nice things and spend their money in that manner, Catholic churches included (i.e. St. Isaacs where I grew up did a huge renovation that was much more than a facelift), which takes away from their ability to provide charity to the community. Christians, in general, are certainly the typical when it comes to massive churches. But others, such as the Mormons, own massive amounts of land which is then sold or developed generating another revenue stream for the church. There's land just outside of Lake Nona at the Northern border of Osceola County that's Mormon land about to be developed (called Sunbridge, about 2,700 acres).You do realize that Lakewood is an extreme outlier yes? 95% of churches in this country are small, fairly meek looking buildings that cater to their community. My parish had to conduct a fundraiser last year to help a neighboring Episcopal church find money just to repair their roof that was leaking during every rain storm.
Your last sentence is also a misguided over generalization. Go look at any food pantry/outreach service registry in a given city and you'll probably find that the majority of them are religiously affiliated. The St Pete food pantry register says that 70% of the services provided are from religious organizations.
And unlike blood sucking government programs, this money and donations go straight to actual people. Not to 5-layers of government offices.
My post was certainly a sweeping generalization because there are religious groups that are very involved in their communities. I think it really comes down to the human element and who's running the respective church. Some seem to want nice things and spend their money in that manner, Catholic churches included (i.e. St. Isaacs where I grew up did a huge renovation that was much more than a facelift), which takes away from their ability to provide charity to the community. Christians, in general, are certainly the typical when it comes to massive churches. But others, such as the Mormons, own massive amounts of land which is then sold or developed generating another revenue stream for the church. There's land just outside of Lake Nona at the Northern border of Osceola County that's Mormon land about to be developed (called Sunbridge, about 2,700 acres).
My main point is there are religious organizations acting more as a business, worried about maximizing revenue, then as a religious organization worried about the welfare of everyone. Maybe it's a means to an end, but I just haven't seen it.
Maybe that's the problem. The constituency does not select the leader so there's a stark disconnect between the people you meet on the street and the "business" leaders. At a micro-economic they may be very giving, but that doesn't forgive the macro-economic greed at the institutional level.You seem to forget that a church is really the sum of its' people, not the actual building or the people who run it. Say what you will about Mormons, or Mormon property, but I've always found their members to be some of the most charitable and giving people in the community. Which is rare in an era when people think "doing something" is bitching on Facebook.
My post was certainly a sweeping generalization because there are religious groups that are very involved in their communities. I think it really comes down to the human element and who's running the respective church. Some seem to want nice things and spend their money in that manner, Catholic churches included (i.e. St. Isaacs where I grew up did a huge renovation that was much more than a facelift), which takes away from their ability to provide charity to the community. Christians, in general, are certainly the typical when it comes to massive churches. But others, such as the Mormons, own massive amounts of land which is then sold or developed generating another revenue stream for the church. There's land just outside of Lake Nona at the Northern border of Osceola County that's Mormon land about to be developed (called Sunbridge, about 2,700 acres).
My main point is there are religious organizations acting more as a business, worried about maximizing revenue, then as a religious organization worried about the welfare of everyone. Maybe it's a means to an end, but I just haven't seen it.
Maybe that's the problem. The constituency does not select the leader so there's a stark disconnect between the people you meet on the street and the "business" leaders. At a micro-economic they may be very giving, but that doesn't forgive the macro-economic greed at the institutional level.
About the Mormon land ownership: The Mormon Church is THE single largest single owner of property in FL by acreage. That is insane.
And whenever any slight is brought against the Mormon Business Church, the first response is always "but the people are so nice/giving/amazing etc". Every single time. No one is arguing they aren't, my closest work friend is Mormon he is a great person, would give you the shirt off his back without hesitation. However the organization is shady as hell.
Perhaps they're not and of course I don't see their finances. It's not a bias against religion, it's a bias against centralization. I feel religion is a personal choice that should be practiced locally and shouldn't be burdened with the large overhead and bureaucracy that comes with these institutions. It takes away from the mission.How do you know they're "greedy"? Do you have an inside track on the Mormon finances? They self fund a worldwide network of missionaries which i'm sure is expensive; I would estimate a lot of these holdings help finance that.
You're allowing your personal biases against religion to cloud your judgement.
Just wait until they actually start developing that land instead of just using it as a cattle ranch. They're already in major discussions with various state agencies and getting some pretty sweet deals. It's coming.About the Mormon land ownership: The Mormon Church is THE single largest single owner of property in FL by acreage. That is insane.
And whenever any slight is brought against the Mormon Business Church, the first response is always "but the people are so nice/giving/amazing etc". Every single time. No one is arguing they aren't, my closest work friend is Mormon he is a great person, would give you the shirt off his back without hesitation. However the organization is shady as hell.
Just wait until they actually start developing that land instead of just using it as a cattle ranch. They're already in major discussions with various state agencies and getting some pretty sweet deals. It's coming.
It's not the development. It's the political manipulation and back room deals. Or are you saying grift is ok?Land development. The horror. Everyone run.
Maybe the Texas Secretary of State believes in Osteen too. He recently refused actual aid from Quebec (blankets, beds, and power crews), preferring instead that they just send prayers.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-offers-aid-texas-hurricane-harvey-1.4267387
Interesting. I quote the news article form a legit source and you go claiming I read leftie blogs. I wonder where you got the idea that leftie blogs were pushing it? Maybe it is you who read them, especially since you claim you can name the ones I read (BTW I don't read any).Yawn. Another story drummed up by the leftie sites to be more than it is. This is the only legit news article on the subject; the others are from leftie blogs like Salon making a huge deal of it.
He probably said "thanks but for now we're good" because all of those bases were already covered and having to accommodate a visiting delegation, no matter who well intentioned, wasn't convenient right now.
He did not say "no, we're going to let people go cold and starve. Send prayers instead!!". Of course, this is what the pathetic sites like Salon are pushing.
I can tell which leftie blogs you follow by which non-stories you try to push.
Yawn. Another story drummed up by the leftie sites to be more than it is. This is the only legit news article on the subject; the others are from leftie blogs like Salon making a huge deal of it.
He probably said "thanks but for now we're good" because all of those bases were already covered and having to accommodate a visiting delegation, no matter who well intentioned, wasn't convenient right now.
He did not say "no, we're going to let people go cold and starve. Send prayers instead!!". Of course, this is what the pathetic sites like Salon are pushing.
I can tell which leftie blogs you follow by which non-stories you try to push.
Interesting. I quote the news article form a legit source and you go claiming I read leftie blogs. I wonder where you got the idea that leftie blogs were pushing it? Maybe it is you who read them, especially since you claim you can name the ones I read (BTW I don't read any).
LOL. Nope. Just something that popped up on twitter. And that Sec of State did turn away material and did ask for prayers instead - something that caught my eye. It's not a major story by any stretch of the imagination, but it's not a non-story either. As noted in the story, Quebec helped out after Katrina and had several companies help them out after a big storm in 2013. I just think turning away aid at this point is foolish.Um it's simple. When you read the CBC article it's a total and utter nonstory; a sane person would read that and say "well, it's nice people are thinking of Houston". It's not until you start clicking on the sites like Salon that you get the faux hysteria about evil religious people choosing prayers over blankets or something.
When I googled this I only found the CBC article and the leftie sites. Therefore it leads me to believe you are pushing this nonstory because you read the angle coming from Salon.
And if not, then why did you post it, and why did you post it with the clear intention to have people believe that the Sec State was turning away NEEDED material and saying "fck it God will save us!"
Neither did I, I find tele-evangelicals cruel, however ...Osteen is a dick and I can't stand him. I never liked him before this debacle
Because you believe a satirical left-wing site (yes, that was the original source), like the Huffington Post mistakenly did too?and now I can safely say I almost hate him.
He's actually doing good.
WTF? Commuter just linked the article. Since you are not "a sane person", you clicked on the other links and went sidewaysUm it's simple. When you read the CBC article it's a total and utter nonstory; a sane person would read that and say "well, it's nice people are thinking of Houston". It's not until you start clicking on the sites like Salon that you get the faux hysteria about evil religious people choosing prayers over blankets or something.
When I googled this I only found the CBC article and the leftie sites. Therefore it leads me to believe you are pushing this nonstory because you read the angle coming from Salon.
And if not, then why did you post it, and why did you post it with the clear intention to have people believe that the Sec State was turning away NEEDED material and saying "fck it God will save us!"
I only meant in regards to the current situation, not in general. I loathe tele-evangelists, but tire of the fake news on this one matter.Even Satan can do good things to decieve.
But is greed Joel's motive? If it is, and the prize is to honestly preach the gospel to legitimately reach people in order to achieve salvation and Heaven, he's ultimately doing more harm than good.
Y
And unlike blood sucking government programs, this money and donations go straight to actual people. Not to 5-layers of government offices.