apparently he is a deviant who feels the need to get naked in front of random women and masturbate.
Sick asshole.
Who is next?
Sick asshole.
Who is next?
Louis C.K. next to fall
- Thread starter UCFKnight85
- Start date
is there new info on this? I read recently - will have to find the link - that the comedian in question was not him. Rather, one of the people talking about the matter even stated it wasn't CK.
EDIT: never mind. Just read the NY Times piece. DAMN IT ALL TO HELL. THIS IS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS!
EDIT: never mind. Just read the NY Times piece. DAMN IT ALL TO HELL. THIS IS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS!
Last edited:
The next election when the DNC pays a bunch of women to lie again.
GUYS!!!
People in power - on all sides of the political spectrum use it to their advantage. WHO KNEW!!?!
People in power - on all sides of the political spectrum use it to their advantage. WHO KNEW!!?!
![[roll]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/roll.r191677.gif "roll [roll]")
Here's the thing, the Orange Raccoon can actually get all the p*ssy he wants. I know its strange but maybe 5% of women crave status more than good looks enough that they'd sleep with someone who looks and acts like Donald Trump. And of those 5% maybe 1% are actually hot. So we're talking 1/2000 women here. That's a very small number until you realize that the Orange Raccoon has a full social calendar and probably frequents places where these 1/2000 types flock. He knows his market.
Whereas, Louis CK on the other hand apparently doesn't know his market or maybe is morbid enough that he doesn't want the women who want him, but would rather attack women who aren't into him because imposing himself is his kink.
Whereas, Louis CK on the other hand apparently doesn't know his market or maybe is morbid enough that he doesn't want the women who want him, but would rather attack women who aren't into him because imposing himself is his kink.
Or Bill. Or Biden. Or Dibalsio. Or Booker.
I guarantee you Billy Clinton assaulted more women than we know. Good thing he had HRC there to call those women liars on national tv. Amirite?
Women need to stand up for themselves and tell the truth, unless it's about my husband then you're just a lying money grubbing whore hired by the Right Wing Conspiracy Committee.
Or unless they were assaulted by Trump. Then they are obviously all just lying.
Good point. But it has happened that women have told lies about sexual assault.
Bill Clinton's indiscretions are debatable as to whether he actually did them. Bill Cosby's are not I think. I think what we have to have is repeatable predatory behavior with consistent accounts of tactics that are very specific. I don't see that with Bill Clinton or with Donald Trump, but I do with Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinsten, and Louis CK.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tawana_Brawley_rape_allegations
Were any proved true? If he's raped women he deserves to be in jail like anyone else.
If CNN and MSNBC had attractive women on staff the men would be dropping over there too.
So many signs...how did we miss this?
So many signs...how did we miss this?
First Andy Dick, now him... Why is it always the ones you'd most suspect?
HBO Pulls and drops all of CK Shows
https://www.avclub.com/hbo-drops-louis-ck-from-night-of-too-many-stars-pulls-1820316051
https://www.avclub.com/hbo-drops-louis-ck-from-night-of-too-many-stars-pulls-1820316051
I've fap'd many times to Mika Brzezensky on Morning Joe a few years ago. Not so much lately. She has turned into an extreme anti-trumper and no longer watchable.
My only criticism of all of these reports is that the court of public opinion is judging them before there's any sort of trial. Not saying the claims are false but I would hope there's at least some detailed look into the allegations before you destroy their livelihood.
Typically yes, but none of these Hollywood sickos have even attempted to deny these allegations so far. And LCK has gone totally silent which tells me he is probably nailed on this and is simply talking to lawyers for a way forward.
If someone were innocent and accused of this I would expect them to come out swinging ASAP
He also used to make jokes that included f*cking babies. Yes.
It's sort of fitting that this degenerate was a leftie comedy icon
To be fair, in the New York Times piece about Louis, he asked all the women before he did his thing. It's a weird fetish but if he asked the women first, how is he a predator?
smh. You're joking, yes?
Read the below passage. These are 2 young female comedians who are trying to make it in a male dominated industry, being subjected to this creep stripping naked in front of them and wacking off in the same room. Nowhere does it say they consented or agreed to this.
"As soon as they sat down in his room, still wrapped in their winter jackets and hats, Louis C.K. asked if he could take out his penis, the women said.
They thought it was a joke and laughed it off. “And then he really did it,” Ms. Goodman said in an interview with The New York Times. “He proceeded to take all of his clothes off, and get completely naked, and started masturbating.”
It's definitely a creepy thing to do, but it seems like he felt he had some kind of permission to do that creepy thing. I'm not saying it's a morally upstanding thing to do, but these women were adults and he asked for permission first. Again, creepy, gross thing to do, but not necessarily predatory behavior.
Nowhere in that passage does it say these women gave him permission. Since this article broke, they've said quite clearly that they did not. They laughed at it, nervously, in the room since they were probably stunned at the question and then he launched into being naked.
If there WAS permission, these women wouldn't be coming out now to state what a predator he is.
The entire article is written as if it is facts and not allegations. I'm extremely skeptical about amount of truth written in one sided stories years after something happened especially when they are jumping on a cultural bandwagon while it's hot.
These are purposefully half truths for the shock value of the story. It's a tabloid level article written by a major news source. There is willing obfuscation by the writer for the purpose of declaring guilt. Most news outlets do this now with most topics. It's a product of a society that has never learned to think properly.
My main point was only that he seemed to think there was some kind of permission granted by the women. If there was, he is in the category of creepy fetish comic, not sexually predatory comic. You seem more willing than me to assume a position of absolute knowledge based on the article. Good for you.
lol ok dude. Nearly every article that has come out detailing these Hollywood guys' problems with women has proven to be true, but I'm sure this one is false. Which is why Louis CK is hiding from the media and everyone around him is bailing.
There is another female comic who made allegations against Louis CK back in 2014 but had to face the same naysayers claiming she wasn't credible. She's now not only vindicated but also backing up these claims after talking with these 5 women.
That's true. If it were slander it would be handled quickly through lawyers and a PR campaign denouncing the allegations.
I judge a lot based off their reaction, Louis is hiding like a little bitch that knows he fuked up. He could be innocent, but not looking like it.
