We talk about how great our RBs are and receivers who just need a little space but can't dump it off to them? The ball was either in the dirt or 3 yards over head even on dump offs. You can't say name 9 and then take 2 freshmen off the table right away even though it's been 30 years since Bama started a freshman QB.
https://amp.ncaa.com/amp/news/footb...-football-9-top-scoring-freshman-quarterbacks
You realize that was an old article from beginning of season.
Mitchell- look at his schedule where he played, then didnt play a game after week 4.
Eason- 5 star best qb in country, had 55% completion, only 2400 yards (started all year) and 16 tds, also 1 more INT than MM (not to mention having nothing but 5 stars RB's and WR's to throw to)
Hill- only put up stats against bad teams, got destroyed vs anyone good, didnt play past week 5
Montez- only 1000 yards, 9tds 5 picks, split time, was hurt alot like MM
Virgil - technically a 2nd year player - 2000 yards, 51% comp, 13 TD, 10 picks. only won 1 game.
Jones- had a good year, didnt win alot. Not gaudy numbers but Duke is a passing spread offense. Not alot of TD's (16, started all games) and 9 picks.
Buechelle had a decent year, played well against bad teams as expected, played pretty horribly against good teams. 11 picks.
In reality, MM was in line or better than at least 6 of those guys in every QB stat, including Wins, the most important one.
Obviously Francois, Hurts and id even put Buechelle in there because no matter who u have at QB, FSU, Bama and Texas will win more games than not (usually 8-10 per year) and blow out cupcakes. They also get 4 and 5 stars at skill positions which we dont.
So by the numbers, MM didnt have an amazing year, but he still played better than all but 3, maybe 4 freshmen QB's out of the 9 listed.
Only truly better ones are Francois, Hurts, Buchelle and Dukes qb. Eason for how highly rated he is and talent around him had a horrible year.