ADVERTISEMENT

Maricopa ballot audit

Crazyhole

Todd's Tiki Bar
Jun 4, 2004
23,824
9,586
113
Just curious if anyone is willing to state ahead of time whether they will accept or reject the results regardless of the conclusion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _glaciers
giphy.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Poolside Knight
Isn't this like the 15th audit they've done?
 
I'm just hoping this time is when they find something. We just need that first ball to drop and then the big steal will be exposed.

Then we can, you know, do nothing about it since, you know, there is nothing that can be done about it.
 
I'm just hoping this time is when they find something. We just need that first ball to drop and then the big steal will be exposed.

Then we can, you know, do nothing about it since, you know, there is nothing that can be done about it.
We can always go for another round of securing the election vs disenfranchise POC. That’s always fun.
 
If they just get the right “stop the steal” conspiracy theorist to head it up, who knows what they can uncover. And who cares?
agreed, it would be pretty childish to spend a whole Presidential term denying the results of the previous election.
 
If this moves us closer to voting from our phones, I am all for it.
Why not town halls on issues, instead of representatives?
I was always a huge fan of Ross Perot's Electronic Town Hall.

But like most 'common sense, achievable solutions' with 'open standards' ...
It takes away from 'control.'

The Linux Foundation (LF -- who I have actually been critical about on a few 'organizational things,' but not standards leadership) just literally proposed an open standards integration solution for all the dissepperate authorities, regulatory agencies and Big Tech pushing various 'vaccine verification systems,' state and national, plus international, ones that keep the PII/medical local to the locale, and ...

The LF proposal was sound. But ...

Big Tech and countries don't want open. They want controlling. The want datawarehousing.

The same thing happened after 2000, many of us came together and put forth voting system standards -- just like we did with ATMs (as they moved away from OS/2) -- including involving Diebold and IBM. They were all pre-existing, Linux-based solutions with all sorts of PKI and authorities, with paper trails and automation.

Nope, we'll use fat clients like Access, Excel and script in VBScript. Diebold and IBM rolled their eyes, but that's what idiots ('customers') wanted, so they got them.

That's why I have no hope that vaccination verification will remotely work, let alone it will allow massive abuse and datawarehousing. Heck, the US gov't -- let alone state gov't and Big Tech -- are so incompetent, they're doing the work for the Chinese ... and we even pay them to do some of it too!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ElprofesorJuan
Why not town halls on issues, instead of representatives?
I was always a huge fan of Ross Perot's Electronic Town Hall.

But like most 'common sense, achievable solutions' with 'open standards' ...
It takes away from 'control.'

The Linux Foundation (LF -- who I have actually been critical about on a few 'organizational things,' but not standards leadership) just literally proposed an open standards integration solution for all the dissepperate authorities, regulatory agencies and Big Tech pushing various 'vaccine verification systems,' state and national, plus international, ones that keep the PII/medical local to the locale, and ...

The LF proposal was sound. But ...

Big Tech and countries don't want open. They want controlling. The want datawarehousing.

The same thing happened after 2000, many of us came together and put forth voting system standards -- just like we did with ATMs (as they moved away from OS/2) -- including involving Diebold and IBM. They were all pre-existing, Linux-based solutions with all sorts of PKI and authorities, with paper trails and automation.

Nope, we'll use fat clients like Access, Excel and script in VBScript. Diebold and IBM rolled their eyes, but that's what idiots ('customers') wanted, so they got them.

That's why I have no hope that vaccination verification will remotely work, let alone it will allow massive abuse and datawarehousing. Heck, the US gov't -- let alone state gov't and Big Tech -- are so incompetent, they're doing the work for the Chinese ... and we even pay them to do some of it too!
Because the representative should be the hedge against the fickle whims of the mob. I’m all for as many venues as possible where we can discuss important information unfiltered by an activist media. But we aren’t a pure democracy for a reason and that’s a good thing.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: chemmie and UCFCray
We need to go to virtual voting. have voting by phone or computer that never gets counted, and inside elites can just install who they want after declaring them the victors.
 
What if it comes back and says that Biden won? Still won't accept it?
Why would he. The actual audit that determines who the electors are assigned to is what is accepted. They could mark up a bunch of ballots with Trump or wipe their ass with the Biden ones before tossing them and I couldn’t give two shits.
 
Why would he. The actual audit that determines who the electors are assigned to is what is accepted. They could mark up a bunch of ballots with Trump or wipe their ass with the Biden ones before tossing them and I couldn’t give two shits.
famYIJY6yeDxnbk-eg2Wt1PHtDcMb6WidivyD-A6kslCLGbx3LWIcAlul43AiyQLzD11OGTOJa1iZIqsZvgYy8rfMhc3kjWXs4g86ckL0pBknOhGB7syadfEwX13sBa4D3Js2VTvLApE1FvNOxhf_iAtimTBOBVXL90
 
Because the representative should be the hedge against the fickle whims of the mob. I’m all for as many venues as possible where we can discuss important information unfiltered by an activist media. But we aren’t a pure democracy for a reason and that’s a good thing.
I never said the people should write all the laws directly! Ross Perot did not either. Just like we have Constitutional Amendments that are more than a simple majority.

But the sheer level of special interest and pork that dominates every bill in Congress has utterly been out-of-control for a long, long time.
 
I never said the people should write all the laws directly! Ross Perot did not either. Just like we have Constitutional Amendments that are more than a simple majority.

But the sheer level of special interest and pork that dominates every bill in Congress has utterly been out-of-control for a long, long time.
Agree with your last statement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFBS
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT