Bernie says it should be 15/hr yet only pays his staff 13. Ironic.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/be...complaining-fleeing-over-poverty-wages-report
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/be...complaining-fleeing-over-poverty-wages-report
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bernie says it should be 15/hr yet only pays his staff 13. Ironic.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/be...complaining-fleeing-over-poverty-wages-report
Why not just print money and give everyone 50k?i mean why stop at $15? why not ask for $25hr? that would put people around $50k a year and no one would be poor!
Sorry, I’m not a Bernie guy. Beat him up at will.Ive been out all day and am shocked the shookster or shook chicken didnt respond.
If you were to make a law that full time jobs have to pay a living wage, Walmart is going to drastically cut their full time employees. It’s not Walmart’s responsibility to make sure that a cashier or a stocker can head a household on what they make. It is the responsibility of that cashier or stocker to obtain the skills using any and all resources at their disposal to earn enough money to head that household.Sorry, I’m not a Bernie guy. Beat him up at will.
I do believe that a full time job should pay enough to keep an employee off welfare. Why should the Federal Government be subsidizing a company like Walmart for crying out loud????!!?
Sorry, I’m not a Bernie guy. Beat him up at will.
I do believe that a full time job should pay enough to keep an employee off welfare. Why should the Federal Government be subsidizing a company like Walmart for crying out loud????!!?
Absolutely. Everybody knows that jobs aren’t around to make a living on, right?It’s not Walmart’s responsibility to make sure that a cashier or a stocker can head a household on what they make.
Absolutely. Everybody knows that jobs aren’t around to make a living on, right?
And in Walmart’s case, why pay them more when they can count on Uncle Sam to pick up the slack, right?
But who wants to discuss corporate socialism? Better to get back to railing about Bernie.
Christ, Joey, 15 dollars an hour isn’t even half that!!! And the average McDonalds “burger flipper” makes $4.85 an hour—a whopping $10,000 a year!The term burger flipper is a metaphor for a reason. Nonetheless, let's reward them with a salary of $75,000 a year.
Christ, Joey, 15 dollars an hour isn’t even half that!!! And the average McDonalds “burger flipper” makes $4.85 an hour—a whopping $10,000 a year!
It would be nice once in a while if you clowns had a clue what the hell you were talking about.
Yeah, minimum wage hasn't been that low since the mid 90s.How in the hell can anyone make an average of $4.85 an hour when Federal minimum wage is $7.25 per hour????
It would be nice once in a while if your dumb old ass had a clue what the hell you were talking about.
Jobs are around because people need a service or product supplied and they’re willing to pay money for it. How much money depends on many factors. None of which is primarily to provide a living for someone else. That is a by-product of the individual taking jobs that are valued enough that they earn a living.Absolutely. Everybody knows that jobs aren’t around to make a living on, right?
Yeah, minimum wage hasn't been that low since the mid 90s.
I'm wrong and you have to be right, Husk in butt. In my defense, I was curious about what a burger flipper actually makes an hour and pulled up this site:
https://www.google.com/search?sourc........0....1..gws-wiz.....0..0i131.xFuwi4ImpUg
I so much love this. When did McDonald's start hiring servers? They have cashiers, cooks, shift managers, maintenance people but I have never encountered a server at McDonald's.I'm wrong and you have to be right, Husk in butt. In my defense, I was curious about what a burger flipper actually makes an hour and pulled up this site:
https://www.google.com/search?sourc........0....1..gws-wiz.....0..0i131.xFuwi4ImpUg
I so much love this. When did McDonald's start hiring servers? They have cashiers, cooks, shift managers, maintenance people but I have never encountered a server at McDonald's.
So many folks want to say...Wal Mart or McDonalds. Others say, every job should be a living wage. I own two retail chocolate/coffee stores. My business is highly seasonal and I employ between 5 and 15 people depending on the time of the year. I am not highly capitalized and people don't need my products.
In this entire discussion everyone says look out for the worker,but few if any say, look out for the entrepreneur and small business owners. If minimum wage goes to $15 an hour a couple of things happen on my end. First, I will have to increase prices to consumers to help with this added costs to me. Added costs include a significant jump in payroll taxes. This by the way will benefit the Federal Treasury significantly.
The next thing that could happen is if my demand falls and I can't get more money , I will then figure out a way to do more with less people. I will cut jobs, especially for high school kids. So, if you're thinking a high school kid needs a livable wage , know this, those jobs for young people will just be reduced or eliminated. It seems a job is better than no job, but what do I know.
Now those of you who disagree with me, I say this. These are things I will do regardless of what you say. You can disagree with this but it doesn't change the reality that small businesses will increase prices, cut hours, eliminate jobs and worse case just close up shop. In the end small businesses will bare the brunt of this and do what they can to shift costs to you the consumer. This means costs of good and services will go up for everyone.
Any business owner will tell you that they pay their employees as much as they can. I've owned several businesses and paid as low as minimum wage to employees that weren't terribly productive and as high as 30 bucks an hour for the ones who were. The funny thing about it was that I never had an employee ask for a raise that actually deserved it. The ones who did got raises because I saw how hard they worked and just gave them more money.
I owned a coffeeshop for about 15 years, and one memory stands out to me. I went in on a Saturday morning around 10, and the kid working was wiping down counters with not a single customer in the store. I laughed and asked if it had been a slow morning, and he said it was steady for a little while. I ran a sales printout and he had already done a thousand bucks in sales, which for a town of 8000 was a phenomenal amount of business, 2 or 3 times what we would normally do. I just turned to him and told him I was giving him a 3 dollar raise. That kid has one of the best work ethics I've ever seen and he was rewarded for it. He had to have been absolutely swamped but just shrugged off the notion.
Shookster lost it long ago but he constantly reminds us just how frayed and demented his brain is
Priceless 85. I admit the McDonald's information I pulled up was likely incorrect and I get taunted for it.
Yet after mistakenly blasting me for supporting the Jusse Smollett story, this little weasel didn't have the guts to admit he was wrong and apologize to me.
When mistakes happen, some people man-up while others show their insecurity.
Priceless 85. I admit the McDonald's information I pulled up was likely incorrect and I get taunted for it.
Yet after mistakenly blasting me for supporting the Jusse Smollett story, this little weasel didn't have the guts to admit he was wrong and apologize to me.
When mistakes happen, some people man-up while others show their insecurity.
Priceless 85. I admit the McDonald's information I pulled up was likely incorrect and I get taunted for it.
Yet after mistakenly blasting me for supporting the Jusse Smollett story, this little weasel didn't have the guts to admit he was wrong and apologize to me.
When mistakes happen, some people man-up while others show their insecurity.
Priceless 85. I admit the McDonald's information I pulled up was likely incorrect and I get taunted for it.
Yet after mistakenly blasting me for supporting the Jusse Smollett story, this little weasel didn't have the guts to admit he was wrong and apologize to me.
When mistakes happen, some people man-up while others show their insecurity.
Personally, I do fundamentally believe if someone has a full-time job, then their take-home pay SHOULD be sufficient to cover their basic needs of survival (shelter, food, travel costs, etc) as being alive and able to make it to work is a necessary condition to be employed in the first place. A worker earning less than a living wage is a negative externality on the macroeconomy as they require more public assistance to survive (paid for in higher taxes) and do not adequately contribute to the overall growth of GDP.If you were to make a law that full time jobs have to pay a living wage, Walmart is going to drastically cut their full time employees. It’s not Walmart’s responsibility to make sure that a cashier or a stocker can head a household on what they make. It is the responsibility of that cashier or stocker to obtain the skills using any and all resources at their disposal to earn enough money to head that household.
Personally, I do fundamentally believe if someone has a full-time job, then their take-home pay SHOULD be sufficient to cover their basic needs of survival (shelter, food, travel costs, etc) as being alive and able to make it to work is a necessary condition to be employed in the first place. A worker earning less than a living wage is a negative externality on the macroeconomy as they require more public assistance to survive (paid for in higher taxes) and do not adequately contribute to the overall growth of GDP.
And the real rub is on most accounts, the Minimum Wage WAS a living wage for much of the 20th Century after its introduction, as that was its whole intended purpose. It wasn't until the 70's that the Minimum Wage failed to keep up with Cost-of-Living increases. The phenomenon has only worsened in recent years as wage growth has continued to consolidate at the upper end of the spectrum with a very small proportion of the population. The Federal Minimum has been stagnant at $7.25 for 10 years now.
That being said, despite supporting the concept of a Living Wage, I do not in any way support the $15 being pushed by labor orgs and progressive politicians. The excellent MIT Living Wage calculator shows the avg US Living Wage at 12.19, Median at 11.57, Minimum at 10.38 (SD) and Max at 17.76 (DC). Democrats have allowed fast-food workers in NY City and LA and the SEIU to dictate the agenda and have blown past the $10.10 the Obama admin supported in '13 and $12 it did in '15, and that would have disasterous impact on employment, probably to the tune of over a million jobs.
So where does that leave us? The absolute first thing, Barr minimum action we need to take is to pass legislation pegging the Minimum Wage to changes in the CPI. That way, worker's purchasing power isn't held hostage and eroded by the whims of Congress. Had the Min Wage changed with the CPI each year starting in 2010, it would be at almost $8.50 today. That would mean an extra $2500 in each FT min wage worker's pocket. I could do a lot with a $200 more a month, and I'm sure low income workers could doubly so (especially considering the average rent in Orlando has gone up over $100 in that same time period).
Second, I would establish a base Minimum Wage up to some level incrementally over the next couple of years to come closer to a living wage, perhaps $10 or $11. I don't think anything over that would be politically feasible, and I would be concerned anything more could have negative employment consequences that would outweigh the wage growth.
Third, realizing $10 in CA doesn't buy the same as $10 in AL, allow for regional variation in the CPI to adjust the Base Minimum Wage to a final Effective Min Wage.
Finally, we need to end mostly Republican-led policies that are driving up housing prices. The FL Legislature is still raiding the Sedowski fund to cover budget shortfalls and tax cuts, and local officials are rewarding the developers who contributed to their campaigns by allowing expensive low-density development instead of requiring lower-cost, high-density housing.
Yep.Why does working 40 hours for one employer suddenly qualify you for a “living wage” any more than working 60 hours for 2 employers? Why does the magical 40 hours make a difference?