The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday upheld a lower court ruling that NCAA rules limiting what athletes can receive while playing sports violate antitrust laws, but the three-judge panel also threw out a plan that would have allowed schools to provide deferred athletes compensation of as much as $5,000 per year.
...The Rule of Reason requires that the NCAA permit its schools to provide up to the cost of attendance to their student athletes. It does not require more.”
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...peals-court-ncaa-violates-antitrust/73079962/
I'm not sure exactly what this means. Stay tuned.
...The Rule of Reason requires that the NCAA permit its schools to provide up to the cost of attendance to their student athletes. It does not require more.”
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...peals-court-ncaa-violates-antitrust/73079962/
I'm not sure exactly what this means. Stay tuned.
