Hearing about yet another gov official with something like 13 sexual assault allegations against him, many with witnesses and corroborators. When will it end, is no one safe? This is getting nuts.
Next one to fall
- Thread starter NinjaKnight
- Start date
I saw an article the other day, and can't find it now, about how much money our Federal Government has spent settling sexual harassment claims out of court with tax dollars. It was unreal.
I think I've heard of this too. Rape accusations too. So, when they finally reveal who this scum is, he (or she) needs to go. Clean up this crap now!
I think it's just a power thing, it corrupts a lot of people unless you have extensive training or checks and balances in place.
not often we can all agree these people are scumbags and should be removed from office/jobs and punished heavily.
Glad you agree that THE DONALD should be removed from Office and punished heavily. See! WE CAN AGREE!
lol you spoiled it too soon. I wanted to get all the Trumpets on board before the big reveal.
I can't quite figure out what that has to do with this thread about yet another gov official who has over a dozen sexual harrasment/assault accusations with evidence and witnesses.
DODGE DODGE DODGE
DEFLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEECT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
^trumpet debate logic in a nutshell
DEFLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEECT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
^trumpet debate logic in a nutshell
He won’t answer that because if he honestly said “HILLARY!!!!” then he’d be admitting to voting for a woman who slut shamed Bills accusers and a woman who helped slander a woman that was more than likely raped by Bill Clinton.
This is the ONLY reason you’ve seen a few lefties finally, 30 years later, coming out to admit Bill raped Juanita Broderick and “condemning him”. Not becuase they actually care or want to- but becuase they must, in order to have a sliver of credibility when they want to go nuclear on Trump and his own accusations.
If HRC had won the New Yorker and NYT would have never, ever written a hit piece on Bill. He’d be as off limits as he’s been his entire career.
That’s why you aren’t getting an answer.
Hahaha this guy talking about Hillary again. I beginning to think you secretly have a crush on her bro.
Well of course, that's trumpet debate tactic 101: Deflect to Hillary/Obama whenever a point is brought up about Trump that they can't defend
You can't talk about sexual harassment by Trump or anyone else and completely ignore what the Dem golden geese Clintons did.
To be honest, I've never had a problem with her looks, at any age. Truth. I find her far more attractive than her daughter. I know it's popular to make fun of her looks, but I won't. If I was Bill, I wouldn't have cheated on her ... at least for physical reasons (it could be because of something else -- although I have a feeling Bill has 'other issues,' especially given the assault allegations).
That said ...
I've always had a problem with her since her "Travelgate" ethics. What finally turned me was the very, very impartial US GAO report way back early in 1993 itself. The US GAO reports to the President (her husband) no less, and wasn't an 'independent counsel.' I love the GAO because they are bean counters, and about as politically removed as you can get.
The US GAO not only exposed the conflicts-of-interest of several parties, but the infamous, never-ending, repeat, "I don't recall" and "I don't remember" that Hillary has used. And they exposed her downplaying her role in the affair, to the point they cornered her and she had to admit to it, or it would have been lying to federal officers. Sound familiar?
I could care less that she wanted to be President, that's an honorable goal. But for a woman who started in politics out of ethical concerns in the '60s, and lambasted Nixon in the '70s ... she has a lot of Nixon in her.
Not my words ... but the words of people who worked in the Nixon administration.
But you can talk about Weinstein, Franken, and the 50 million other threads in the cooler about sexual harrasment and assault. Just not Trump. He's off limits.
Actually, the reason people ignored Trump's baggage is because they ignored Clinton's.
It's not a surprise and not a coincidence that this didn't all start until after Hillary lost.
![[sick]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/sick/sick0006.r191677.gif "Sick [sick]")
Lmao Bob. You are the biggest Trump nuthugger on here. You have literally posted that you don't think Trump actually lied, just exaggerating. Yes, you are that dumb.
Move the goal posts!!!! Deflect deflect deflect!!!! Show me where I have ever avoided or defended Republicans accused of sexual assault. That's all you liberals do. Still not a peep about Conyers or Franken. Trump did it too!!!!
How exactly is me showing you sucking on Trump's nutsack moving the goal posts when I claimed you were a Trump nuthugger? You really are stupid, you know that? Anyway how about you show me where you condemned Trump for his 13 allegations of sexual assault.
I just showed you a quote from me on Franken. Proving your statement above wrong.
Another day, another post showing how goddamn full of shit you are. Literally everything you post is wrong.
Last edited:
Oooohhhh. Congrats!!!! One tax and spend, rip up the Constitution liberal said something. Where are all you're other circle jerk libtard buddies? I haven't seen a peep from them. Everyone in the Dem party is professing what great men they are for letting themselves be investigated. The MSLM is faux raging about another tweet from Trump. When do the liberal rapists get held accountable?
Recap:
-You spewed bullshit
-I provided direct quotes showing how you spewed bullshit, and then asked you to back up your claims
-You moved the goalposts (multiple times: ex-"calling me a tax and spend liberal [which is 100% false and you can't back your claim up] and then changed it to "other liberals" aren't calling him out [which is also 100% false]) AND to top it all off you dodged my question.
This has to be a record. 4 wrong things in one post.
You really are a shit tier poster.
Apply the same logic to yourself ... you get the same result.
This is Progressive media 101 logic ... hypocrisy in self-re-enforcing action.
Seriously ... you may be right, and yet, you have the same credibility issue too.
And you wonder how Trump won?
