I was surprised how she really dominated the debate for 20 minutes and then really seemed like she was on her heels from then on.She is lost. Not able to get the heels up this time.
Pence probably did win the debate. I can't stand his robotic cadence, but yes he did better than Harris.The most eventful part of that debate was Pence's pink eye and the fly. Both evaded questions and there was nothing memorable that is going to cause any sort of momentum for either side.
All he did was avoid questions. When asked about pre existing conditions he decided to talk about court packing. If you prefer Pence you think he won, if you prefer Harris you think she won. Neither was great, neither was terrible, and it isnt going to have any impact on the election.Pence probably did win the debate. I can't stand his robotic cadence, but yes he did better than Harris.
Eh. They both had some decent moments. Avoiding the questions was kind of annoying but I thought it was more an issue of having time constraints and both wanting to respond to the earlier topic than anything. I honestly don't understand why a candidate can't just say to the moderator: "who cares about the time limit, let's just keep going"? I thought this was a really good debate and wish both of them had twice as much time as they did.All he did was avoid questions. When asked about pre existing conditions he decided to talk about court packing. If you prefer Pence you think he won, if you prefer Harris you think she won. Neither was great, neither was terrible, and it isnt going to have any impact on the election.
I couldn't tell if that was a show or just her voice, but she really sounded like she was ready to cry 3 or 4 times. Maybe she just isn't all that good in 1 on 1 debates.Thinking that was in anyway an even debate is a level of delusion that i didn’t know existed.
Kamala “can I speak to a manager” Harris was in borderline hysterics with her voice frequently cracking as if she was on the verge of tears as soon as she got pressed.
Pence was calm, composed and surgical in his takedown.
May Kamala RIP
I agree....No one really said anything new.Nobody won, cut it out.
Pence sounded robotic and monotone to me.Thinking that was in anyway an even debate is a level of delusion that i didn’t know existed.
Kamala “can I speak to a manager” Harris was in borderline hysterics with her voice frequently cracking as if she was on the verge of tears as soon as she got pressed.
Pence was calm, composed and surgical in his takedown.
May Kamala RIP
Wow.....Kamela Harris getting owned.
The fly just checked into Walter Reed.
Just because they want to get rid of the ACA doesn't mean they don't want to protect pre-existing conditions.The amount of bullshit Pence tried to spread during the debate was impressive. The fact checkers worked overtime last night to catch it all.
My favorite was Pence’s claim that the Trump Administration supports insurance coverage that covers pre-existing conditions while they argue in the supreme court to end the ACA that does exactly that.
They don't have a replacement plan, so yes it does.Just because they want to get rid of the ACA doesn't mean they don't want to protect pre-existing conditions.
Just because they want to get rid of the ACA doesn't mean they don't want to protect pre-existing conditions.
And that is 100% on them. We have no idea other than saying they want to protect pre-existing conditions. Just a hunch, but I would imagine it would involve a public option like what we used to have with state pools.Then what’s their plan? For four years, Donald has been saying that his plan is coming out in two weeks. Over 200 weeks later, here we are.
If you are truly interested in protecting people with pre-existing conditions from losing their insurance, wouldn't you propose and pass a new plan that covers pre-existing conditions before eliminating the ACA?And that is 100% on them. We have no idea other than saying they want to protect pre-existing conditions.
And that is 100% on them. We have no idea other than saying they want to protect pre-existing conditions. Just a hunch, but I would imagine it would involve a public option like what we used to have with state pools.
Yes.If you are truly interested in protecting people with pre-existing conditions from losing their insurance, wouldn't you propose and pass a new plan that covers pre-existing conditions before eliminating the ACA?
They have no plan, if they did they would reveal it. They have no interest in protecting pre existing conditions policies.And that is 100% on them. We have no idea other than saying they want to protect pre-existing conditions. Just a hunch, but I would imagine it would involve a public option like what we used to have with state pools.