ADVERTISEMENT

Nm

For 13 months we've gotten the same answer out of Fauci on basically everything. "We don't know yet".


Why does the media even bother with talking to him at this point?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yaes
Remember, the US Media asks a lot of 'loaded' questions.
I'd like to hear a full answer to 'less loaded' question.

As always ... the US Media is really ignorant of how coronaviruses work.
That's why I've spent the last 15 months watching APAC based news.
 
Given the incredible progress the Biden Administration -- with Dr Fauci's continuing leadership -- has made with the pandemic vaccinations since mid-January, it's nothing short of mind-boggling that there are diehard Trumpets who can't help embarrassing themselves by continuing to criticize the guy.

At this point, guys, I'd recommend that you quit digging a deeper hole for yourselves.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: KNIGHTTIME^
Given the incredible progress the Biden Administration -- with Dr Fauci's continuing leadership -- has made with the pandemic vaccinations since mid-January, it's nothing short of mind-boggling that there are diehard Trumpets who can't help embarrassing themselves by continuing to criticize the guy.

At this point, guys, I'd recommend that you quit digging a deeper hole for yourselves.
I actually 100% agree with you on this point.

Dr. Fauci isn't a fortune teller. But when he doesn't get a loaded question, and is allowed to answer, he makes total sense. The left and the US Media used to do it. Now the right wing is doing it.

And Dr. Fauci can be wrong at times. He was initially wrong about ddl and ddC for combating HIV. But then he backed them after a few years of seeing he results, even as the US FDA was still recommending against them.

He learned. Doctors are wrong all-the-time, but they are making the most educated, expert guesses they can. Loaded questions by the media doesn't help, whether Fauci is supporting President Trump or President Biden, especially when the latter two over-state things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFCray
Fauci has been a failure on covid and it is undeniable.
Only in The World According to KNIGHTTIME.
He came out with an accurate statement that masks were for show and had to back track with Google hiding those videos.
You mean when this unprepared country was facing a serious mask shortage at the very beginning of the pandemic? You mean then?

Funny how you love to point that out while ignoring the hundreds of times your boy, Trump, said the most outrageous statements about COVID.
He was all about lockdowns that didn't work. Closing schools was always a terrible idea and knowing the facts still went down that path of closing schools.
First off, we're talking about how best to address a pandemic that this world had never seen before. It's not like any of the experts had a manual to refer to.
Now facts of removing mask requirements are leading to no increase of infections in those states. Meanwhile the lockdown State of Michigan trying to reopen is blowing up. So all the lockdowns were useless.
Not wearing masks causes no increase in the infection rate? WTF? How exactly are these marked increases in infections happening then, Dr. KNIGHTTIME?

When it comes to government actions (i.e. lockdowns vs do whatever), the key is how the public responds. It doesn't matter what steps a Governor takes if a good percentage of the state's citizens say, "FU, I ain't wearin' no frickin' mask! Freedom, baby!"
 
The worse pandemic the world has ever seen? Really? Might want to google or read a history book.
You might want to reread what I said.
In what strange world do we lock up young healthy folks for a virus that isn't deadly in a bunch of age categories? In what weird world do we close gyms that would help the severity of getting the virus? In what weird world do we damage kids without almost a 0% chance of dying from covid by closing their school. Killing their sports? Really?
What lockdowns? What states remain 'mostly closed'? According to the NYT, that number is nadda with only a handful of states reporting 'mixed.'
Masks didn't work. The betas flipped out because the freedom States stopped requiring them. Oh look...no issues. Whoops...kills that narrative
Studies have concluded that the majority of adults across the US wore masks and social distanced. However, these same studies have reported ranges by state anywhere from 20% to 35% of people who have ignored the order in any situation where mask-wearing wasn't absolutely required to enter a store.

How many people do you think those percentages translated to? But we're to believe that it was actually those mask-wearers who got infected? WTF??!? Jesus, how stupid do you think we are?
 
You might want to reread what I said.

What lockdowns? What states remain 'mostly closed'? According to the NYT, that number is nadda with only a handful of states reporting 'mixed.'

Studies have concluded that the majority of adults across the US wore masks and social distanced. However, these same studies have reported ranges by state anywhere from 20% to 35% of people who have ignored the order in any situation where mask-wearing wasn't absolutely required to enter a store.

How many people do you think those percentages translated to? But we're to believe that it was actually those mask-wearers who got infected? WTF??!? Jesus, how stupid do you think we are?
Plot multiple states or countries on the same graph and tell me if the masks are working. There is no discernible correlation between mask usage and the "cases". Even better try to tell me when the mask mandates went into effect in each locality without the implementation dates identified, you can't because there is no correlation. There are plenty of places that are heavily masked where they put in the mandate and the cases skyrocketed.

You can cherry pick studies all you want, this is the real world and the results show that at best there is no identifiable correlation. I'll be charitable and not answer your final question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KNIGHTTIME^
You can cherry pick studies all you want, this is the real world and the results show that at best there is no identifiable correlation.
LMFAO. You talk about cherry picking studies but tell me with a straight face that masks make no difference??!?

I guess I've missed all those thousands of angry testimonials from faithful mask wearers who got infected anyway. Weird how this virus somehow picked on high-profile Republican politicians who refused to wear masks. I know, I know, just a coincidence, right?

Strange how surgeons and their attending nurses wear masks during surgery. You'd think they're 'smart enough' to know there's no identifiable correlation between mask wearing and any follow-up infections their patients might get from non-mask wearing surgeons.

Listen, if you want to stupidly ignore COVID protection protocols, and risk infecting yourself and those around you, nobody is going to stop you. But please spare us your dumb-ass attempt at justifying it.
 
Half of Hollywood got covid. Ultra liberal California that shutdown 2x and severe restrictions had the same basic per capita numbers as Florida. Your blame game on Republicans isn't working since you can't back it up with data. 13 months in and you can’t admit actual data yet?
I pointed out the high profile maskless Republicans who got COVID but Chuds come in all shapes, sizes, regions, and yes, political persuasions
 
And mask liberal chuds got at the same rate. Example California...I guess sitting in your basement is a legit way to not get it.
Total bullshit, as usual.

You don't have a frickin' clue whether MASKED people -- liberals or conservatives -- got COVID in California, Florida, or any other state.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT