Just tax capital gains at the same rate as regular income. Problem solved.Get woke dementia man lovers. Enjoy the market in the dumps.
Jesus Bethany. Did the room clear?Just tax capital gains at the same rate as regular income. Problem solved.
Explain to me why I can keep a larger percentage of passive earnings than active income? And no, it isn't money that you've already been taxed on so let's put that one to bed right out of the gate.Ironically if dementia man kills the stock market with tax increases they won't have to worry about "capital gains".
Affects me84% of stocks are owned by 10% of the population.
Doesn’t affect me. Don’t carehat TRILLIONS have been handed out to Wall Street, but you're mad about $5K going to a migrant
Bamboozled.Affects me
Doesn’t affect me. Don’t care
You risk capital for gains! For you risking your capital the government wants almost 50% of those profits. What a freaking joke. You want to encourage investments.
You had me until the last sentence. Should we really be ok with laws of any kind that only affect some people? I can't get on board with thatHow is risking capital for gains any different than a person opening a business for gains? Both involve risk so why should they be taxed so much differently? What about someone working on commission? That is a risk too. There are lots of different types of risks in the economy. And from what is being reported (the actual plan has not been released yet), the top rate doesnt start until $1 million a year in capital gains. This isnt something that is going to impact the vast majority of the country.
You had me until the last sentence. Should we really be ok with laws of any kind that only affect some people? I can't get on board with that
I get that, and I probably could have phrased it a little bit better. I just really don't like the tenor of the statements that include things like "it'll only affect (x) people. That doesn't set well with me.We already have that, it's no different than a progressive income tax system. But we have all kinds of laws, regulations, or incentives that only affect some people. But I should also rephrase that it only affects some people. It theoretically affects anyone, but obviously not everyone is going to make millions in capital gains a year.
I feel terrible for the multi-millionaires who will have to pay taxes after spending year after year finding loopholes, hiding money in the Cayman Islands, lobbying politicians, and every other thing under the sun to escape contributing to a well-rounded society.You risk capital for gains! For you risking your capital the government wants almost 50% of those profits. What a freaking joke. You want to encourage investments.
It appears that you don’t understand the concept of incentives.I feel terrible for the multi-millionaires who will have to pay taxes after spending year after year finding loopholes, hiding money in the Cayman Islands, lobbying politicians, and every other thing under the sun to escape contributing to a well-rounded society.
Another trickle down economics believer.It appears that you don’t understand the concept of incentives.
Also, you’re funny if you think that the federal government produces a well-rounded society.
That’s a pretty ignorant response, TBH.Another trickle down economics believer.
A sucker is born everyday,
Bamboozled!Another trickle down economics believer.
A sucker is born everyday, I guess.
OMG, evil billionaires are out to get you.Bamboozled!
"Incentives" lol. How the hell did billionaires, already cheating on their taxes, manage to convince ordinary American people to give them even more "incentives" to lie, cheat, and steal, the wealth created by the working 99% of the population?
They aren't out to get us. They are already getting us. Just because you've been hoodwinked, doesn't mean the rest of us have to take it in the ass, too.OMG, evil billionaires are out to get you.
As I told the chocolate guy somewhere else... you're problem is thinking you're anywhere close to being near their wealth and influence.Billionaires? No.. The wealthy. Seems like there’s a lot of unambitious, haters in this thread.
I’ll give you another chance, since you’re poor and have no ambition. Hating on people with money. If you were in the elite group, in the ballpark, or had ambition to be, you would and should care. If you’re not, you won’t. There are hard working rich people and I’m sure a few on this board or in the DungeonAs I told the chocolate guy somewhere else... you're problem is thinking you're anywhere close to being near their wealth and influence.
Again, stop believing that I'm simply talking about ordinary Americans who worked their way up to a successful living. In most cases, even $1M a year is a pittance.I’ll give you another chance, since you’re poor and have no ambition. Hating on people with money. If you were in the elite group, in the ballpark, or had ambition to be, you would and should care. If you’re not, you won’t. There are hard working rich people and I’m sure a few on this board or in the Dungeon
Spell out the exact people that this applies to since you struck out with the billionaire comment
This! ^^^^^^^^You're being hoodwinked. These guys have been taking and taking and taking while normal Americans, even those making $1M a year, are just trying to get by. And, when the shit hits the fan, they take some more and throw the blame on poor people.
Just raise interest rates to 6 or 7% on treasuries. Safe investment with a decent return. The rich can keep their money and not exploit the system.Get this in the commie state of New York. The combo federal and State capital gains will be 58.2%. Lol! All that risk and you keep 40%. 🤪
There's no such thing as right wing economics. It's been reduced to "low taxes=economic growth".The naivety of fans if right-wing economics is astounding.
IMO, that's the top end. Shillers has the stock market nearing 40% overvalued, and that doesn't even take into consideration inflation rates. I could easily see the DOW drop to 8 or 9k in real money.I don't think sending rates to normal rates would mean 80% drop in the stock market. That would be early 90s level
How does anybody not see that we are taking the exact same path as we did in the 1920s? Low interest easy money lending policies, a stock market that is way overvalued, a total lack of rational actors in the investment sector, and proposed tariffs. This is a mirror image of 1929.He's going to 'balance out' the loss of domestic investment with a new 'tariff system' but it's not called a 'tariff.'
No, I'm not kidding. This is extreme politicking 'innovation' at its finest. As an engineer, it just insults my intelligence.
Oh, I see it. In fact, the 'Rolling 20s' are even back in increasing cliche!How does anybody not see that we are taking the exact same path as we did in the 1920s? Low interest easy money lending policies, a stock market that is way overvalued, a total lack of rational actors in the investment sector, and proposed tariffs. This is a mirror image of 1929.