ADVERTISEMENT

Nm

I actually have no problems with this. After a Transplant you are severely immune compromised, Not the time to get Dr Fauci's Wuhan flu.
 
Healthcare is a right, so this has to be a fake story
Interesting angle.

The “healthcare is a human right” crowd would have to oppose this, or they’re advocating for what they describe as a human rights violation for not getting the shot.
 
Interesting angle.

The “healthcare is a human right” crowd would have to oppose this, or they’re advocating for what they describe as a human rights violation for not getting the shot.
Nobody should be refused life-saving treatments for any reason.

Or something like that. It's a fluid situation here, trying to determine who is worthy of medical care makes the fuhrer tired. Hashtag death panels.
 
I actually have no problems with this. After a Transplant you are severely immune compromised, Not the time to get Dr Fauci's Wuhan flu.
But it won't stop there. We're at the point of asterisksville ... and it won't end well.

At least it's a private entity ... and not government, yet.
 
Nobody should be refused life-saving treatments for any reason.

Or something like that. It's a fluid situation here, trying to determine who is worthy of medical care makes the fuhrer tired. Hashtag death panels.

There arent an infinite amount of organs that can be used for transplants. Hospitals have always had certain criteria on who best qualifies for a transplant, I dont see how this is any different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaShuckster
Interesting angle.

The “healthcare is a human right” crowd would have to oppose this, or they’re advocating for what they describe as a human rights violation for not getting the shot.

Of course the other angle is that the people who dont think healthcare is a right really have no basis to complain, this goes both ways.
 
There arent an infinite amount of organs that can be used for transplants. Hospitals have always had certain criteria on who best qualifies for a transplant, I dont see how this is any different.
Sounds like healthcare rationing to me
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFBS
Why does everyone want organs for all? Isn't that a Socialist way of thinking?

My vaxxed ass is drinking extra this weekend because the line will be shorter for my new kidney.
 
Socialism for this crowd is defined as "anything done for somebody else and not me."
Oh, it's worse than that.

Americans think it's not only 'for me' but don't realize, it actually costs. And that 'cost' is the fact that socialism isn't about 'giving to others for free,' but 'giving up things for others.'

As I always only half-joke ...

Socialism is a religion where you're forced to go to a church you don't believe in, and not just give up more than your 'fair share,' but where the priest live off of it more than the people who are allegedly going to 'receive it.'
 
Meh. Non-candidates for organ transplant also include smokers, those with cancer, those with obesity, those older than X age. When ranking candidates for transplant they weigh all factors in the viability of the transplant and probability of success. Organs are a finite resource and I have no issue with criteria for receiving a transplant to maximize its chances of success.
 
Meh. Non-candidates for organ transplant also include smokers, those with cancer, those with obesity, those older than X age. When ranking candidates for transplant they weigh all factors in the viability of the transplant and probability of success. Organs are a finite resource and I have no issue with criteria for receiving a transplant to maximize its chances of success.
Natural selection and discriminary practices ... especially if there is an underlying health condition that prevents weight loss or someone cannot get any vaccine due to allergy or side effects (especialy if confirmed after a 1st shot).

That's what's actually wrong with what we're doing right now. No exceptions, not even medical.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT