ADVERTISEMENT

No charges in Jacob Blake shooting

The officer won't face any charges and has been exonerated. Riots start at 7 pm eastern, 6 central.

The Kenosha District Attorney's argument was that his prosecutors would not be able to disprove a claim of self-defense from the police officer who did the shooting since Wisconsin law holds that a person can shoot if he or she reasonably believes firing is necessary to avoid being killed or badly hurt.

A reasonable person might wonder how in the world the victim could have been considered a threat when his back was turned to the officer...but HEY, the Kenosha gang gave this case a thorough and fair hearing, right guys? ;)
 
The Kenosha District Attorney's argument was that his prosecutors would not be able to disprove a claim of self-defense from the police officer who did the shooting since Wisconsin law holds that a person can shoot if he or she reasonably believes firing is necessary to avoid being killed or badly hurt.

A reasonable person might wonder how in the world the victim could have been considered a threat when his back was turned to the officer...but HEY, the Kenosha gang gave this case a thorough and fair hearing, right guys? ;)

Kyle Rittenhouse come on down! If you can't prove it wasn't self defense then he should be sleeping easy.
 
Kyle Rittenhouse come on down! If you can't prove it wasn't self defense then he should be sleeping easy.
I'm sure that's the Kenosha County gameplan!

Hell, if you can't disprove self-defense when you shoot a guy five times in the back, I'm guessing bringing an AR-15 to a protest rally and then killing two people isn't a problem either.
 
I'm sure that's the Kenosha County gameplan!

Hell, if you can't disprove self-defense when you shoot a guy five times in the back, I'm guessing bringing an AR-15 to a protest rally and then killing two people isn't a problem either.
Just because you have a gun doesn't mean someone can't try to kill you.
 
The Kenosha District Attorney's argument was that his prosecutors would not be able to disprove a claim of self-defense from the police officer who did the shooting since Wisconsin law holds that a person can shoot if he or she reasonably believes firing is necessary to avoid being killed or badly hurt.

A reasonable person might wonder how in the world the victim could have been considered a threat when his back was turned to the officer...but HEY, the Kenosha gang gave this case a thorough and fair hearing, right guys? ;)
This was all explained to you clearly and in-depth in previous threads. I would tell you to go look them up but you always ignore them and just repeat your initial assumption. Bottom line is this was always going to be the outcome based on the totality of the circumstances, events, and evidence.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT