ADVERTISEMENT

Not something you see every day in a satellite

UCFBS

Todd's Tiki Bar
Gold Member
Oct 21, 2001
30,240
11,472
113
USA


Pentax-300-rails-2048x977.jpg


A $1K Pentax DA* 300 f/4 lens is at the heart of a nanosatellite.


Pentax weather sealed primes ... people have been putting them into high altitude baloons and, now ... satellites! I have the DA* f/2.8 200 (306mm equiv 35mm) perfection myself, and this is the DA* f/4 300 (460mm equiv 35mm). Both lenses have virtually no distortion, no vignetting and are the ultimate in the $1K price-point ... let alone are very compact, hence the use here.

da_300.jpeg


Taking out of its terrestrial housing, it still has all the other gaskets and seals, and allegedly works well with total lack of pressure, actually improving some sealing. Flare coating is standard, so that did not need be added.

da_300_custom.jpeg


This is the same, 4-model series, as my DA* 200 f/2.8 (the only other tele prime of the 4) many of you probably saw me lug to games a decade ago or so. I still take it with me to away games sometimes. Both the 200 f/2.8 and 300 f/4 tele primes were designed in the '00s, from the prior, highly-rated, Pentax glass, only updated to be compact, and are pretty much unchanged since.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: UCFloridaTech


Pentax-300-rails-2048x977.jpg


A $1K Pentax DA* 300 f/4 lens is at the heart of a nanosatellite.


Pentax weather sealed primes ... people have been putting them into high altitude baloons and, now ... satellites! I have the DA* f/2.8 200 (306mm equiv 35mm) perfection myself, and this is the DA* f/4 300 (460mm equiv 35mm). Both lenses have virtually no distortion, no vignetting and are the ultimate in the $1K price-point ... let alone are very compact, hence the use here.

da_300.jpeg


Taking out of its terrestrial housing, it still has all the other gaskets and seals, and allegedly works well with total lack of pressure, actually improving some sealing. Flare coating is standard, so that did not need be added.

da_300_custom.jpeg


This is the same, 2-model series as my DA* 200 f/2.8 many of you probably saw me lug to games a decade ago or so. I still take it with me to away games sometimes. Both the 200 f/2.8 and 300 f/4 tele primes were designed in the '00s, from the prior, highly-rated, Pentax glass, only updated to be compact, and are pretty much unchanged since.


Time to take your mania meds
 


Pentax-300-rails-2048x977.jpg


A $1K Pentax DA* 300 f/4 lens is at the heart of a nanosatellite.


Pentax weather sealed primes ... people have been putting them into high altitude baloons and, now ... satellites! I have the DA* f/2.8 200 (306mm equiv 35mm) perfection myself, and this is the DA* f/4 300 (460mm equiv 35mm). Both lenses have virtually no distortion, no vignetting and are the ultimate in the $1K price-point ... let alone are very compact, hence the use here.

da_300.jpeg


Taking out of its terrestrial housing, it still has all the other gaskets and seals, and allegedly works well with total lack of pressure, actually improving some sealing. Flare coating is standard, so that did not need be added.

da_300_custom.jpeg


This is the same, 4-model series, as my DA* 200 f/2.8 (the only other tele prime of the 4) many of you probably saw me lug to games a decade ago or so. I still take it with me to away games sometimes. Both the 200 f/2.8 and 300 f/4 tele primes were designed in the '00s, from the prior, highly-rated, Pentax glass, only updated to be compact, and are pretty much unchanged since.



...in other words, it's a really nice space-grade camera lens for <$1000. 😁👍
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFBS
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT