ADVERTISEMENT

Party of Family Values News Check In for 3/15

fried-chicken

Diamond Knight
Jan 27, 2011
10,643
5,348
113
Don Jr's wife cites his tweets as a friction point in their relationship, files for divorce.

Porn star Stormy Daniels interview gets an air date, scheduled for March 25th on 60 min.

Trump Brags about making up facts when he talks. Related, making up facts is lying.

Pretty solid day for the Party of morality and family values.
 
Thanks for adding absolutely nothing to the conversation. I mean seriously what a lazy, pathetic excuse for a post that only further highlights the fact that you honestly think politics are a team sport.

Awww did I ruin your chance to applaud fried chickens totally worthless, partisan Snowflake Report?
 
Honestly though- aside from being disgusting human being that sees everything through a partisan lens, what is the point of gloating about someone’s marriage ending? Do you not see how twisted and pathetic that is?
 
After a quick glance at the title of this thread, I thought this was about a really bad old tv show:

 
Hmmm...

Vote against tax cuts for the middle and lower class.
Talk about $1-2k bonuses and an extra $2-4k a year in paychecks being crumbs and nothing big.
Vote against fixing healthcare.
Hold up healthcare for children for illegal immigrants.
In turn ditch the illegal immigrants when Trump decides to try and help them.

Did I do that right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sir Galahad
people get divorced all the time. its actually quite sad our divorce rate is so high. that said, i dont care if they are or not, it doesnt affect me.

porn star interview? meh, id rather just watch regular porn

i honestly dont care what he says when hes trying to negotiate with our trade partners. results matter to me more. if he can get a better deal thats all i care about.

no side can claim that crap. politicians are all scumbags
 
Honestly though- aside from being disgusting human being that sees everything through a partisan lens, what is the point of gloating about someone’s marriage ending? Do you not see how twisted and pathetic that is?

Youre right, only a truly pathetic human being would every gleefully cheer on another person's divorce.

p0qqqzgj91m01.jpg
 
Honestly though- aside from being disgusting human being that sees everything through a partisan lens, what is the point of gloating about someone’s marriage ending? Do you not see how twisted and pathetic that is?
Oh you have it wrong again. I don't care that people get divorced. I'm not the one yelling "sanctity of marriage" and "family values" either. I only point it out because I'm anti hypocrisy, not because I'm anti divorce.
 
Oh you have it wrong again. I don't care that people get divorced. I'm not the one yelling "sanctity of marriage" and "family values" either. I only point it out because I'm anti hypocrisy, not because I'm anti divorce.

The fact that you think the Trumps represent the "family values" part of the Republican party is laughable. You might want to pull your head out of the ground and look around once in awhile.
 
The fact that you think the Trumps represent the "family values" part of the Republican party is laughable. You might want to pull your head out of the ground and look around once in awhile.
The Republican party is the party of Trump. Please tell us more about who represents the family values side of the Republican party though.
 
The Republican party is the party of Trump. Please tell us more about who represents the family values side of the Republican party though.

You're right. They'd all be much more family values oriented if they called for unlimited late term abortions, or were champions of sanctuary for illegal felons.
 
Youre right, only a truly pathetic human being would every gleefully cheer on another person's divorce.

p0qqqzgj91m01.jpg

So, you absolutely hate Trump yet fried chicken is acting exactly like him, and yet you have nothing to say about him.

Yep.
 
The Republican party is the party of Trump. Please tell us more about who represents the family values side of the Republican party though.

You are an amateur at politics.

First, Trump doesn't represent all Republicans any more than Hillary represents all Democrats. Everything Trump says and does doesn't represent the feelings of every Republican any more than everything Hillary does and says represents the feelings of all Democrats. The fact that you don't know that is shocking.

Second, when you say "tell us more about who represents the family values side" you are looking for somebody to point at and say "that person doesn't represent my family values". It's counter productive and basically a waste of your time. The "family values" is part of the Republican platform that represents their economic and social policies.

You are welcome for your political lesson of the day.
 
You are an amateur at politics.

First, Trump doesn't represent all Republicans any more than Hillary represents all Democrats. Everything Trump says and does doesn't represent the feelings of every Republican any more than everything Hillary does and says represents the feelings of all Democrats. The fact that you don't know that is shocking.

Second, when you say "tell us more about who represents the family values side" you are looking for somebody to point at and say "that person doesn't represent my family values". It's counter productive and basically a waste of your time. The "family values" is part of the Republican platform that represents their economic and social policies.

You are welcome for your political lesson of the day.
Got it, do as I say not as I do.
 
You're right. They'd all be much more family values oriented if they called for unlimited late term abortions, or were champions of sanctuary for illegal felons.
No one in office is for unlimited late term abortions anymore than Bob wants to round up and exterminate Muslims.
 
Sanders opposes any and all restrictions on abortion. Explain how that policy does not support late term abortions.
I'm not saying this is not true but I just don't know the stance of the independent senator from Vermont but can I get a source on this?
 
I don't see where he affirmatively said allow all abortions regardless of term and health of mother.

That's something you made up in your head, he just didn't get into specifics on a touchy issue.
 
I don't see where he affirmatively said allow all abortions regardless of term and health of mother.

That's something you made up in your head, he just didn't get into specifics on a touchy issue.

Most the entire Democratic Party is fully aligned against any restrictions to abortions for ever AFTER 20 weeks, which they just voted against in congress, having voted against the measure many times in the past. Pelosi went on record in 2013 saying that abortions, even after 20 weeks, are "sacred" to her. Right as she attempted to bullshit everyone about how Catholic she is.

Below is a sonogram at 20 weeks. It's not a "collection of cells"; it's a human child.

 
Most the entire Democratic Party is fully aligned against any restrictions to abortions for ever AFTER 20 weeks, which they just voted against in congress, having voted against the measure many times in the past. Pelosi went on record in 2013 saying that abortions, even after 20 weeks, are "sacred" to her. Right as she attempted to bullshit everyone about how Catholic she is.

Below is a sonogram at 20 weeks. It's not a "collection of cells"; it's a human child.

You don't know anything about the decisions people have to make. The bills you're referring to don't provide the support for women with health risks. No democrats are out here supporting cutting up babies at 39.5 weeks. Its boogie man shit that you're all afraid of but it doesn't exist.
 
I don't see where he affirmatively said allow all abortions regardless of term and health of mother.

That's something you made up in your head, he just didn't get into specifics on a touchy issue.

He said he does not support any regulation on abortion. That means he supports abortion regardless of term and health. Not sure how it could be any clearer, no restrictions means no restrictions.
 
Lets say the woman and the 20 week old baby are both people. Both have rights. Why put one in front of the other?
 
So, you absolutely hate Trump yet fried chicken is acting exactly like him, and yet you have nothing to say about him.

Yep.

Goes both ways chief. You are whining and bitching about FC not respecting the sanctity (lol) of Trump's marriage yet you obviously didn't give a shit about Trump mocking a marriage.

I'll let you decide who has a bigger impact on our country, FC's water cooler post or the son of the POTUS.

Of course everyone knows you don't ACTUALLY give a shit about this stuff you are whining about, you just care about making your side look like it's "winning"
 
He said he does not support any regulation on abortion. That means he supports abortion regardless of term and health. Not sure how it could be any clearer, no restrictions means no restrictions.
He's been in office for decades, has he ever voted for what you're accusing him of supporting?
 
Trump said he wanted to commit war crimes during the campaign. No one thinks that's his current position on the issue. Yet you're standing by saying democrats support late term abortions because Bernie Sanders said it's a decision between a doctor a woman and her family?
 
You don't know anything about the decisions people have to make. The bills you're referring to don't provide the support for women with health risks. No democrats are out here supporting cutting up babies at 39.5 weeks. Its boogie man shit that you're all afraid of but it doesn't exist.

Is this where you try to convince me that most abortions are not in fact elective, based upon convenience? (which they are)
 
Goes both ways chief. You are whining and bitching about FC not respecting the sanctity (lol) of Trump's marriage yet you obviously didn't give a shit about Trump mocking a marriage.

I'll let you decide who has a bigger impact on our country, FC's water cooler post or the son of the POTUS.

Of course everyone knows you don't ACTUALLY give a shit about this stuff you are whining about, you just care about making your side look like it's "winning"

You're pathetically nitpicky. I didn't even know your idiot tweet about Trump existed, mostly because I don't spend hours on Trump's timeline going back years to see what he said.

However YOU chose to use it, while giving FC a total pass for the same shit. You're a hypocrite.
 
Is this where you try to convince me that most abortions are not in fact elective, based upon convenience? (which they are)
You don't know shit about it. It doesn't matter why people make the decisions they make. That's what rights are for.
 
You're pathetically nitpicky. I didn't even know your idiot tweet about Trump existed, mostly because I don't spend hours on Trump's timeline going back years to see what he said.

However YOU chose to use it, while giving FC a total pass for the same shit. You're a hypocrite.
Well I covered that I don't care about his marriage. I'm more upset about the hypocrisy of someone who can't keep his own personal shit together being the beacon for all these people who blame broken homes for every problem in america.
 
You are an amateur at politics.

First, Trump doesn't represent all Republicans any more than Hillary represents all Democrats. Everything Trump says and does doesn't represent the feelings of every Republican any more than everything Hillary does and says represents the feelings of all Democrats. The fact that you don't know that is shocking.

Second, when you say "tell us more about who represents the family values side" you are looking for somebody to point at and say "that person doesn't represent my family values". It's counter productive and basically a waste of your time. The "family values" is part of the Republican platform that represents their economic and social policies.

You are welcome for your political lesson of the day.
damn that was good
 
You're pathetically nitpicky. I didn't even know your idiot tweet about Trump existed, mostly because I don't spend hours on Trump's timeline going back years to see what he said.

However YOU chose to use it, while giving FC a total pass for the same shit. You're a hypocrite.
Where did I say I give FC a total pass?

You, however, did whine and bitch about FC's post, and now that you do know about DJTJr's stance on marriage, I'm sure you will be right along to post the exact same thing as you posted below, except this time about DJTJr:

Honestly though- aside from being disgusting human being that sees everything through a partisan lens, what is the point of gloating about someone’s marriage ending? Do you not see how twisted and pathetic that is?

I'll be patiently waiting for your righteous condemnation.
 
We almost had to have an abortion, it was a tough decision, glad I live in a civilized country that doesn't put a 8 week old fetus rights ahead of my wifes or my 3 year old daughters. Hardest decision we ever made but I'm sure as someone who just thinks abortions are for birth control im sure you have a lot of valuable opinions to add to the discussion.
 
Trump said he wanted to commit war crimes during the campaign. No one thinks that's his current position on the issue. Yet you're standing by saying democrats support late term abortions because Bernie Sanders said it's a decision between a doctor a woman and her family?

Sanders supports late term abortion. He said it very clearly. No restrictions means no restrictions. Why are you lying? What would you say about a person that supports zero restrictions on guns?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFBS
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT