Wow. Sucks.Our WRs are having a difficult time with injuries in the NFL. Looking for a big year from Brandon Marshall. Any updates on JJ? I noticed that Perriman didn't play in the Raven's first game.Broken fibula, unfortunately.
Whenever I think of money-player Marshall, all I can think of how GOL switch him the biggest DB in college football to make sure we lost every game. He did the same with Our other returning, pro-size receiver. It was O'Leary's way of saying "I'm in charge, and we're going to become a grind it out offense with huge linemen and lots of Georgia players. [Am I still bitter after all these years? You bet. Need a Frost-coached game to cleanse my palate. And more cowbell!]Looking for a big year from Brandon Marshall.
That coaching produced 3 conference titles (I don't count shared titles and played for two more), and a BCS bowl win. Most programs would love to play for or win/co-win six titles in 12 years. Those who dwell on the bad times or years can stay there. This year is likely to be kind of brutal in some games but it'll be fun to see the new style develop (along with the players).Whenever I think of money-player Marshall, all I can think of how GOL switch him the biggest DB in college football to make sure we lost every game. He did the same with Our other returning, pro-size receiver. It was O'Leary's way of saying "I'm in charge, and we're going to become a grind it out offense with huge linemen and lots of Georgia players. [Am I still bitter after all these years? You bet. Need a Frost-coached game to cleanse my palate. And more cowbell!]
That coaching produced 3 conference titles (I don't count shared titles and played for two more), and a BCS bowl win. Most programs would love to play for or win/co-win six titles in 12 years. Those who dwell on the bad times or years can stay there. This year is likely to be kind of brutal in some games but it'll be fun to see the new style develop (along with the players).
That coaching produced 3 conference titles (I don't count shared titles and played for two more), and a BCS bowl win. Most programs would love to play for or win/co-win six titles in 12 years. Those who dwell on the bad times or years can stay there. This year is likely to be kind of brutal in some games but it'll be fun to see the new style develop (along with the players).
Yeah Matt. I agree. It's as if folks know more than GOL. Not defending him, but come on. He did what he did for a reason.
Whenever I think of money-player Marshall, all I can think of how GOL switch him the biggest DB in college football to make sure we lost every game. He did the same with Our other returning, pro-size receiver. It was O'Leary's way of saying "I'm in charge, and we're going to become a grind it out offense with huge linemen and lots of Georgia players. [Am I still bitter after all these years? You bet. Need a Frost-coached game to cleanse my palate. And more cowbell!]
You are correct. I remember it well.This is the dumbest thing I've read in a while. GOL switched Marshall and Mike Walker because we were DESTROYED with injuries and players leaving in the secondary. Not to prove some fictional point.
Who is this guy?
JJ needs to get into the arena league, CFL, or overseas. He has too much talent. Can't beleive no NFL team wants to give him a shot. This guy is a starWow. Sucks.Our WRs are having a difficult time with injuries in the NFL. Looking for a big year from Brandon Marshall. Any updates on JJ? I noticed that Perriman didn't play in the Raven's first game.
You remember what the coach said was the reason. And sure the defense sucked, but so did the offense. So here's the actual story. GOL intended to mold UCF's identity into a smash-mouth running game along with a good running QB because that's what worked for him at Georgia Tech. He knew they weren't going anywhere his season, so he dedicated the offense to learning to block the inside run game. Every quarterback he got at UCF he compared in terms of of his old GaTech QB, Joe Hamilton. We had a string of afterthought quarterbacks good at handing off to 220 lb. running backs. Even Jeff was an outrageously elusive broken field runner until he got hit too often. Bortles was the exception, too good and too much a winner to keep off the field. Brent Key recruited so much receiver talent and Taaffe took over the offense, so O'Leary couldn't really object. Still GOL insisted on Blake running too much, putting our one golden season a hit away from ending.You are correct. I remember it well.
Your "actual" story is 100% speculative. I'll have to go with what the actual coach said over what you "think" happened. A lot of "intended" and "he knew" = subjective.You remember what the coach said was the reason. And sure the defense sucked, but so did the offense. So here's the actual story. GOL intended to mold UCF's identity into a smash-mouth running game along with a good running QB because that's what worked for him at Georgia Tech. He knew they weren't going anywhere his season, so he dedicated the offense to learning to block the inside run game. Every quarterback he got at UCF he compared in terms of of his old GaTech QB, Joe Hamilton. We had a string of afterthought quarterbacks good at handing off to 220 lb. running backs. Even Jeff was an outrageously elusive broken field runner until he got hit too often. Bortles was the exception, too good and too much a winner to keep off the field. Brent Key recruited so much receiver talent and Taaffe took over the offense, so O'Leary couldn't really object. Still GOL insisted on Blake running too much, putting our one golden season a hit away from ending.
Yeah, sure. Like any other coach in America would have made that switch. Argument was absurd on the surface. Hey, Michael Jordan, we're really thin at center, so I hope you don't mind getting battered under the boards this season. Oh, Reggie Jackson, our pitchers aren't doing well with their battery mates, so I'm moving you to catcher -- one finger's a fastball and two is the slider. Also, by not getting to further develop their talents, cost both players dearly in draft round taken. But check out the coach's quotes if you want.Your "actual" story is 100% speculative. I'll have to go with what the actual coach said over what you "think" happened. A lot of "intended" and "he knew" = subjective.
Yeah, sure. Like any other coach in America would have made that switch. Argument was absurd on the surface. Hey, Michael Jordan, we're really thin at center, so I hope you don't mind getting battered under the boards this season. Oh, Reggie Jackson, our pitchers aren't doing well with their battery mates, so I'm moving you to catcher -- one finger's a fastball and two is the slider. Also, by not getting to further develop their talents, cost both players dearly in draft round taken. But check out the coach's quotes if you want.
Comparing apples and oranges is a pretty weak argument. You are comparing college freshman and sophomores on an 0-12 football team with some of the greatest names inYeah, sure. Like any other coach in America would have made that switch. Argument was absurd on the surface. Hey, Michael Jordan, we're really thin at center, so I hope you don't mind getting battered under the boards this season. Oh, Reggie Jackson, our pitchers aren't doing well with their battery mates, so I'm moving you to catcher -- one finger's a fastball and two is the slider. Also, by not getting to further develop their talents, cost both players dearly in draft round taken. But check out the coach's quotes if you want.
The only relevant "facts" were the ones I referred to in my post: the round they went in the draft, which constrains the signing contract and dictates the base for their early career years. Of course you can say that made Brandon extra angry, hungry, and determined to prove them wrong, but even for him, it was a tough climb from low salaries at the beginning. With Walker, going in a higher round would have made his injury-shortened stay a lot more lucrative. They both also lost the chance for the development and stats to leave for the pros early like Kevin did.Can't argue with the facts.
Uh, if your best player is not playing at a position that makes anywhere near the best use of his talents. Wasn't that clear enough? We didn't exactly light up the scoreboard that season and Marshall wasn't more than just good in the defensive backfield.I'm not quite sure how any of this relates to your original argument
"Whenever I think of money-player Marshall, all I can think of how GOL switch him the biggest DB in college football to make sure we lost every game"
Best player?? We knew in 2004 that Marshall was going to be what he turned out to be??? It's about the team. Not thinkng about the NFL. Coaches don't think that way. At that time the defensive backfield was so depleted, that was the best move. We just did an entire 360.Uh, if your best player is not playing at a position that makes anywhere near the best use of his talents. Wasn't that clear enough? We didn't exactly light up the scoreboard that season and Marshall wasn't more than just good in the defensive backfield.
That coaching produced 3 conference titles (I don't count shared titles and played for two more), and a BCS bowl win. Most programs would love to play for or win/co-win six titles in 12 years. Those who dwell on the bad times or years can stay there. This year is likely to be kind of brutal in some games but it'll be fun to see the new style develop (along with the players).
I knew I could count on your knowledge to put this to restBelieve it was Brando Marshall that went to O'Leary to "volunteer" to play DB too since the team was so short handed in 2004.
Marshall, who obviously still has some off the field issues even to this day, (as he did while at UCF), still does the right thing more than not, including this.move back in 2004.
Best player?? We knew in 2004 that Marshall was going to be what he turned out to be??? It's about the team. Not thinkng about the NFL. Coaches don't think that way. At that time the defensive backfield was so depleted, that was the best move. We just did an entire 360.
Marshall started 7 games in 2004, led the entire team in tackles, had at least one INT (he was pretty good and shows how weak we were defensively) and played the entire rest of his career at WR, starting 21 games before and after that. There's not one bit of fact to your statement that he was made a DB to throw away the season "lose every game", or trying to make him something he wasn't to prove a point or to mold him.
A lot coaches see the writing on the wall and give up on winning now in favor of building for the future. The difference here was moving your difference makers at receiver for the short term to defense with no intention of developing them there.Best player?? We knew in 2004 that Marshall was going to be what he turned out to be??? It's about the team. Not thinkng about the NFL. Coaches don't think that way. At that time the defensive backfield was so depleted, that was the best move. We just did an entire 360.
Marshall started 7 games in 2004, led the entire team in tackles, had at least one INT (he was pretty good and shows how weak we were defensively) and played the entire rest of his career at WR, starting 21 games before and after that. There's not one bit of fact to your statement that he was made a DB to throw away the season "lose every game", or trying to make him something he wasn't to prove a point or to mold him.
A lot coaches see the writing on the wall and give up on winning now in favor of building for the future. The difference here was moving your difference makers at receiver for the short term to defense with no intention of developing them there.