ADVERTISEMENT

Snoop Dogg takes on Trump (again) bit this time crosses the line (again)

Jedi.Knight

Bronze Knight
Apr 21, 2008
1,178
851
113
Shouldn't matter which side of the aisle you're on, something like this is borderline seditious and completely disgusting at best. At 46 years old, having made it out of the hood in one piece, this asswipe is still encouraging young black men to join violent gangs like the Crips. And yet he wonders why so many young black men are getting murdered in inner cities. Isn't is amazing that once these hood refugees get some money they completely forget where they came from. Would be nice to see the Snoop Dogg Center for Academic Excellence break ground soon in central Compton, but I won't hold my breath on that anytime soon.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-new-album-cover-shows-dead-Donald-Trump.html
45EB5C6500000578-0-image-a-1_1509576042968.jpg


Can you imagine an album cover with Obama on a slab with Ted Nugent standing over him grinning?
I can’t either.
 
Last edited:
Why is it that the biggest goddamned snowflakes are always the people who complain the most about PC culture and people being offended?

Oh and a 5 second Google search showed that Snoop supports the following charities:

Let me just saw that I'm totally shocked you are a whiny little bitch snowflake AND wrong. /Sarcasm
 
Killing Trump is now a well established normality of the left wing in this country. They don’t even really attempt to hide that this is what they want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne and UCFBS
Why is it that the biggest goddamned snowflakes are always the people who complain the most about PC culture and people being offended?

Oh and a 5 second Google search showed that Snoop supports the following charities:

Let me just saw that I'm totally shocked you are a whiny little bitch snowflake AND wrong. /Sarcasm
Two organizations missing from your pointless little diatribe are D.A.R.E. and the Police Athletic League, both of which are left to pick up the pieces from when gangs like the Crips poison the black community with crack cocaine while spilling untold amounts of blood in a senseless "turf war" over property that doesn't even belong to them. Sorry, but railing against gang violence (Make America Crip Again) isn't the hallmark of a snowflake; it's the hallmark of someone with the balls to stand up for what is right. NinjaKnight, you could stand to grow a pair of balls yourself.
 
Also, that image goes far beyond political satire; it's a threat against a sitting president and is in violation of federal law whether you like it or not. Snoop may have the Crips on his side, but Trump's got Seal Team 6 and I'd place my money on the ST6 any day of the week. Snoop and Sean Penn may soon end up becoming roommates in some off-the-grid hiding place.
 
Last edited:
Why is it that the biggest goddamned snowflakes are always the people who complain the most about PC culture and people being offended?
Simple, it's a double standard and hypocrisy in action. And when you do not agree, you too look like yet another Progressive that enjoys that double standard too.

Now we Libertarians say you Progressives have that right. But we can also agree the Conservatives are spot-on when they call you hypocrites too.

Oh and a 5 second Google search showed that Snoop supports the following charities:
Classic Clinton-Progressive move.

Deflect a valid criticism by charging they do good for society, and should be excused. The President of NOW did that for Bill. Various celebrites did that for Harvey. Just write a check to Planned Parenthood and you too can be excused, especially compared to those abusive husband's of flyover territory.

Ninja, man, this right here is why Donald Trump won. It's exact sets of statements like yours that have such a false narrative to them. Even people who voted Trump and now regret it, look at people like yourself and go, "I didn't really want Trump, but I didn't want that attitude (yours) in my leadership far more."

As the OP asked ...

"Can you imagine an album cover with Obama on a slab and the klan standing over him?"
 
Why is it that the biggest goddamned snowflakes are always the people who complain the most about PC culture and people being offended?

Oh and a 5 second Google search showed that Snoop supports the following charities:

Let me just saw that I'm totally shocked you are a whiny little bitch snowflake AND wrong. /Sarcasm
I think you know I am not a snowflake but you are better than defending this garbage . This is truly sad
 
I think you know I am not a snowflake but you are better than defending this garbage . This is truly sad
He not only missed the final point of the OP, but spewed the same, utter, MSM garbage by quoting all the charities Snoop supports.

Snoop is protected by the 1st Amendment ... and no differently than White Supremacists.

Why is it that every time we, as Americans, make progress against the racists and stereotypes on the right, the left not only quickly meets them on the same, mud-filled field ...

But the MSM and Progressives are there to excuse it?
 
Two organizations missing from your pointless little diatribe are D.A.R.E. and the Police Athletic League, both of which are left to pick up the pieces from when gangs like the Crips poison the black community with crack cocaine while spilling untold amounts of blood in a senseless "turf war" over property that doesn't even belong to them. Sorry, but railing against gang violence (Make America Crip Again) isn't the hallmark of a snowflake; it's the hallmark of someone with the balls to stand up for what is right. NinjaKnight, you could stand to grow a pair of balls yourself.

How many times are you going to move the goalposts after I prove you are wrong? First you were whining that snoop didn't donate to charities, I proved you are full of shit, now it's: snoop doesn't donate to charities that jedi.knight wants him to?

And then ending your post with a ball joke? Based on what exactly? Because I proved you are full of shit, I don't have balls? We all know you are racist piece of shit, but I guess we need to add racist, immature, and illogical piece of shit to the list.

I think you know I am not a snowflake but you are better than defending this garbage . This is truly sad

Where exactly did I defend snoop? All I did was point out the hypocrisy of the same crowd practically shouting from the roof tops during charlottesville "MUH FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!!" are now whining, bitching and moaning when someone shares something they don't agree with. Not just jedi either.
 
First you were whining that snoop didn't donate to charities, I proved you are full of shit, now it's: snoop doesn't donate to charities that jedi.knight wants him to?
Actually, I never complained about Snoop not giving to charity. In fact, my exact quote was "Would be nice to see the Snoop Dogg Center for Academic Excellence break ground soon in central Compton, but I won't hold my breath on that anytime soon."

Creating an organization and giving to someone else's charity are two completely different things. Th only thing that you "proved" was how much you lack basic reading and comprehension skills, dumbass.
 
Two organizations missing from your pointless little diatribe are D.A.R.E. and the Police Athletic League, both of which are left to pick up the pieces from when gangs like the Crips poison the black community with crack cocaine while spilling untold amounts of blood in a senseless "turf war" over property that doesn't even belong to them.
Alright, you're going way too far the other way. Chill.

Let's also not forget that there is good evidence the US gov't was also involved with feeding drugs into the streets as well.

Sorry, but railing against gang violence (Make America Crip Again) isn't the hallmark of a snowflake; it's the hallmark of someone with the balls to stand up for what is right. NinjaKnight, you could stand to grow a pair of balls yourself.
Frankly, I wish people would stop getting their panties in a wad, and trying to make everything "wrong" and "against (insert stereotype) people."
 
Actually, I never complained about Snoop not giving to charity. In fact, my exact quote was "Would be nice to see the Snoop Dogg Center for Academic Excellence break ground soon in central Compton, but I won't hold my breath on that anytime soon."

Creating an organization and giving to someone else's charity are two completely different things. Th only thing that you "proved" was how much you lack basic reading and comprehension skills, dumbass.

Wow, still sticking to that story huh? I mean no one here actually thought you were intelligent, but at least you proved everyone correct.
 
This type of stuff that Snoop is doing is what gets people like Trump elected in the first place.

Nobody ever accused Snoop of trying to make the world a better place. He does things like this to benefit his wallet. Nothing more and nothing less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne and UCFBS
The facts speak for themselves.
2016.12.30%20-%20Chicago%201.JPG
What does this have to do with my point?

My point is that some actions of the US federal gov't have supported the expansion of organized crime, which directly affects urban violence.

I never said organized crime wasn't a growing problem. Far from it! In fact, not only are over 80% of gun homicides in the US committed by organized rime, but organized crime is heavily built on the ability to move drugs, guns and people across borders, both state and federal.

I've long argued this with Progressives. But they seem to think it's about guns and undocumented residents in organized crime aren't issues.
 
Last edited:
alot of the things the left is doing right now is paving the way for trumps second term
Yep. Americans in all political views have a lot of issues with Trump. But the Progressive media's insolence is still turning a lot of moderates towards conservatism, even if they don't like it much.
 
The guy is a rapper, they usually talk about shooting cops, doing drugs and raping women.

What is the big deal?
 
Ninja isn’t a big fan of federal law. He thinks having laws that enact legal immigration is immoral. He will argue this one too.

Man, I must have really embarrassed the hell out of you since you literally can't post without bringing up my name. It's flattering that I had that big of an impact on your fragile little snowflake feelings.
 
That's electoral, most of the country didn't vote for him.
California pretty much decides the popular vote.

If you remove California, it swings nearly 2M in favor of Trump. Even removing Florida and Texas as well, the next 2 most populous states (Florida overtook New York in 2012), Trump still wins the popular vote.

So we can play this all day. California decides the popular vote.

This is why we have the electoral college. It should be updated, but that would mean it would segment cities from rural, which would favor Conservatives even more. Hence why it still exists, as-is. No one can agree on how to change it again.

BTW, most of the country voted against Bill Clinton in 1992 as well. Democrats always love to bring up Nader in 2000, but conveniently forget Ross Perot in 1992.

Although in 2016, the Democrats had to take out Johnson, because it was the first time a Libertarian was pulling more Democrats than Republicans, because of Clinton. Just spending 10x as much in 10 states than the Libertarians + all SuperPACs had for the entire country, did the job.

In other words ... partisan arguments fall flat with me. I see right through them. That's was objective people do.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jedi.Knight
That's electoral, most of the country didn't vote for him.
California pretty much decides the popular vote.

If you remove California, it swings nearly 2M in favor of Trump. Even removing Florida and Texas as well, the next 2 most populous states (Florida overtook New York in 2012), Trump still wins the popular vote.

So we can play this all day. California decides the popular vote.

This is why we have the electoral college. It should be updated, but that would mean it would segment cities from rural, which would favor Conservatives even more. Hence why it still exists.

BTW, most of the country voted against Bill Clinton in 1992 as well. Democrats always love to bring up Nader in 2000, but conveniently forget Ross Perot in 1992.

Although in 2016, the Democrats had to take out Johnson, because it was the first time a Libertarian was pulling more Democrats than Republicans, because of Clinton. Just spending 10x as much in 10 states than the Libertarians + all SuperPACs had for the entire country, did the job.

In other words ... partisan arguments fall flat with me. I see right through them. That's was objective people do.
If you remove California? Lmao
 
If you remove California? Lmao
Yes, California decides the popular vote.

Clinton: 8,753,788
Trump: 4,483,810

That is nearly twice the margin of victory for Clinton!

Sorry if statistical facts undermine the simpleton "the majority of the country voted for Clinton."

Reality? The majority of the country voted for Trump ... until you add in Clinton. No other significant state has that much of a bias in any candidate's favor.

The electoral college was created so no block of states could control the country. In this case, our modern case, it's now a single state that can, and does, do so.

 
Yes, California decides the popular vote.

Clinton: 8,753,788
Trump: 4,483,810

That is nearly twice the margin of victory for Clinton!

Sorry if statistical facts undermine the simpleton "the majority of the country voted for Clinton."
Statistics don't undermine anything. Most of the country didn't vote for Trump and there's nothing you can do or say about it. You can slice the data however you want, but it changes nothing. I don't care that you're Liberatarian, I don't care about your spoilers, and I don't care that you argue with Progressives. The numbers don't lie!
 
Hold on, are 85 and BT really arguing this? Im not surprised 85 is, I've lost track of how many times I have called him out on posting incorrect information and straight up lies. But bt wtf, I thought you could at least count.

Mac is 100% right, most of the country did not vote for Trump. His premise that "he's not my president" is stupid and immature but he is 100% correct that most of the country did not vote for Trump. How are you two actually trying to argue this, other than from a standpoint of pure ignorance?
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT