Our company finances solar and wind installations across the U.S. (in addition to real estate debt and equity finance as well). Granted, we don't finance residential installations - we're focused on the distributed generation and small/medium utility-scale installations - but, the facts speak for themselves. Battery storage technology has been discussed for a few years now. Utilities are beginning to deploy battery storage (see PG&E and SCE in southern California and the PJM wholesale market in the northeast) as a means of frequency regulation. Additionally, many RFPs (mainly in California and New England) are requiring a battery storage component to complement the solar PV installation.
As for programs to induce the adoption of solar - they've been wildly successful, both from a commercial standpoint as well as a residential standpoint. In fact, in 2014, almost 40% of all new electric generation in the U.S. came in the form of solar. Pricing continues to be driven downward - a further 10% reduction in Q3 and grid parity achieved in the southwestern United States as well as Hawaii and some places in the northeast.
One can't look solely at Florida and extrapolate that solar is a failure in the rest of the country. Florida's legislative and regulatory environment are prohibitive of third-party ownership of power producing systems. Namely, third-party power purchase agreements are illegal in the state. There's an effort to change that - being led by both the left and the tea party/libertarians. Floridians for Solar Choice is a grassroots organization that has tasked itself with adding a ballot initiative for 2016 that would allow for third-party power sales of systems up to 2 MW. If passed, that would completely open up the C&I distributed generation market in Florida. The Kochs and EEI are aggressively fighting it, but the hypocrisy is really very amusing. They're all about states' rights, until it infringes upon their oil and natural gas pocket books. They are very eager to point to the ITC (investment tax credit) as a "subsidy", but fail to call into question the 12 subsidies/favorable tax treatments that oil and nat gas enjoy.