. We deserve better.[/QUOTE said:Tell me again what we have done to "deserve" anything.
I'm not sure why you feel a need to make personal attacks, but this "pathetic" guy celebrated a win with friends hours after the game. Why even have a message board if you aren't allowed to praise, criticize, analyze, or breakdown the performance of players good and bad?Some of you people are pathetic. Instead of being happy that the team won a game you feel it necessary to tear down. I don't get it. Only one statistic really matters. Wins and losses.
Some of you people are pathetic. Instead of being happy that the team won a game you feel it necessary to tear down. I don't get it. Only one statistic really matters. Wins and losses.
spot on. It's seeing someone on the field that you know any coaching staff won't have the time to ever fix bc he just doesn't have any pocket awareness or feel for the game. We are all thrilled that we won but vs other better teams(USF, Temple, Houston) we can't expect special teams and defense to account for that many points. Holman is all feast or famine 500 ball deep and terrible at everything else that gets this offense going that relies on accuracy on short passes & pace to jump on opponents and his anemic 1st halves put all the pressure on the other units to be perfect to stay on pace.I'm not sure why you feel a need to make personal attacks, but this "pathetic" guy celebrated a win with friends hours after the game. Why even have a message board if you aren't allowed to praise, criticize, analyze, or breakdown the performance of players good and bad?
I think that you may be best served posting on UCF fantasyland message board with Peter Pan.
Also, a win is a win, but that doesn't say anything about our team's future games and offense going forward.
So.., we have to wait for a loss to analyze the QB situation?
Aren't you the guy who wanted to ban all GOL posts???
Geez dude. It's a free message board. Let people write what they want. CMonty is a jerk, because that's ALL HE POSTS ABOUT.
Holman is all feast or famine 500 ball deep and terrible at everything else that gets this offense going that relies on accuracy on short passes & pace to jump on opponents and his anemic 1st halves put all the pressure on the other units to be perfect to stay on pace.
Right, but it's worse than that because defenses are jamming the run and daring Holman to pass long into one-on-one coverage. Holman in post game interview said he's "gotta take what the other team gives me." Repeatedly, Holman opted for the home-run ball over open receivers for sure first downs. It's like baiting Donald Trump. A sure thing.
ECU is not a bad team at all. They aren't great as they lost to USC and Vtech pummeled them. This was a decent to quality win for sure.Lol now you guys are saying ECU isn't a good team at all? I had this penciled in for a loss and when they beat NC State - who we couldnt beat in a bowl game in 2014 - i was thinking they and South Florida are the teams to beat. Plus were on the road. To beat them like we did is amazing. I think McKenzie runs this offense better than Holman, but i wouldnt go so far with the criticism laid on him. If any QB had this talent around and couldnt do much was Rob Calabrese. Holman had some deep throws that the receivers should have caught. Maybe Snelson was tweeting about how much faster he thought he was than the receivers on the field today.***
Holman did not play well. A lot of us are done with Holman and all the excuses. I think It's perfectly fine to voice our opinionsLol now you guys are saying ECU isn't a good team at all? I had this penciled in for a loss and when they beat NC State - who we couldnt beat in a bowl game in 2014 - i was thinking they and South Florida are the teams to beat. Plus were on the road. To beat them like we did is amazing. I think McKenzie runs this offense better than Holman, but i wouldnt go so far with the criticism laid on him. If any QB had this talent around and couldnt do much was Rob Calabrese. Holman had some deep throws that the receivers should have caught. Maybe Snelson was tweeting about how much faster he thought he was than the receivers on the field today.***
If anything theyre beat up like usual.ECU is not a bad team at all. They aren't great as they lost to USC and Vtech pummeled them. This was a decent to quality win for sure.
Mod please ban.Holman did not play well. A lot of us are done with Holman and all the excuses. I think It's perfectly fine to voice our opinions
there were a few plays where Holman would hesitate(like always) on an option play and never pitch the ball leading to a sack lossHolman does stretch the defense with his ability to throw deep. Unfortunately he didn't connect a few. His struggle is not mixing in the check downs more and relying on the hero ball.
It is not as easy to put in patti or mm "and just run the ball" as many suggest. They are not proven deep threats and have some height limitations that cause them to miss open WRs. That allows teams to stack the box.
To add to that, his hesitation and failure to properly execute the option has caused a bad pitch relation with the back. They seemed way too close.there were a few plays where Holman would hesitate(like always) on an option play and never pitch the ball leading to a sack loss
He may make a good doctor, as long as he's not an obstetrician, because his deliveries are too long. Or a radiologist. because he can't read and understand the film.I really liked Holman in is first year. He had a strong arm and I felt he would learn to be much better. He has not progressed imo. He seems like a nice guy and may make a good doctor one day but not a good QB...no way. His throwing motion is still too long, doesn't make good reads and has no touch. If he would put more air under the long ball he would do much better by giving his fast receivers a chance to run under it. Very frustrating to watch.
He may make a good doctor, as long as he's not an obstetrician, because his deliveries are too long. Or a radiologist. because he can't read and understand the film.
I'm kidding!!!!!!
He may make a good doctor, as long as he's not an obstetrician, because his deliveries are too long. Or a radiologist. because he can't read and understand the film.
I'm kidding!!!!!!
He will certainly take the top off the defenses and at the very least open up short and mid range passes.Line up Killins for the deep ball.**
Not at all. Frost is an excellent coach so far and Holman is not a good QB. Milton must have been hurt, so Holman was the best option. Although, no one can say for sure if Patti would have played better.So I am confused. You are saying Frost is the greatest coach but can not pick the correct starting quarterback?
I'm not sure why you feel a need to make personal attacks, but this "pathetic" guy celebrated a win with friends hours after the game. Why even have a message board if you aren't allowed to praise, criticize, analyze, or breakdown the performance of players good and bad?
I think that you may be best served posting on UCF fantasyland message board with Peter Pan.
Also, a win is a win, but that doesn't say anything about our team's future games and offense going forward.
So.., we have to wait for a loss to analyze the QB situation?
Aren't you the guy who wanted to ban all GOL posts???
Geez dude. It's a free message board. Let people write what they want. CMonty is a jerk, because that's ALL HE POSTS ABOUT.
The analysis is negative, because it is what it is. If it was positive, then I'll be positive like a lot of my posts.There is a difference between analyze and and downright negativity. "he's one of the worst QBs in college football and he plays for our team. We deserve better". This is not necessary or accurate.
The analysis is negative, because it is what it is. If it was positive, then I'll be positive like a lot of my posts.
It's extremely factual watching it, reviewing it on video and statistically.
Don't tell me what to post and what's necessary and I won't tell you what to post.
Did Frost actually say he was frustrated? Just curious.Three things we know now:
Milton ran more practices than Justin last week (Sentinel today) -- Holman's start was not part of some elaborate, secret PR misdirection; it was really a game-time decision.
Frost was frustrated that Holman was not "taking what the defense was giving him" (Holman's post-game quote about his own performance).
Frost hates to play quarterback roulette. Whoever he starts will stay in there unless he gets too injured to continue.
No. He said he we have to execute the passing game a lot better when defenses dare us to pass. And Holman post-game said he had to take what's given.Did Frost actually say he was frustrated? Just curious.
That's good enough for me. Insert Milton.No. He said he we have to execute the passing game a lot better when defenses dare us to pass. And Holman post-game said he had to take what's given.
Yet there continues to be people who believe that he was "serviceable," and others who don't want us to be negative or critical in anyway. Only "positive vibes" and thoughts.Holman has not improved as a qb since he started. No touch, poor accuracy and poor reads. I initially thought he was going to really improve because he had so much natural potential but he hasn't. Turning a negative into a positive is not our job...it is Holman's job and he has failed.