ADVERTISEMENT

Terrorists Attack Mosques in New Zealand, leave at least 50 dead while livestreaming on fb

We'll prepare to be amazed because I'm glad to fill you in.

Step 1: The shooter was mad about Muslim refugees
Step 2: Wayne said refugees are invaders.

Therefore Uncle Wayne is supporting the shooter's ideology that Muslims are invaders.


1. NAZIs were socialists

2. NAZIs were committed to genocide

Therefore all socialists are committed to genocide.


1. Refugees are either forced to leave or unable to return.

2. The caravan was not forced to leave nor unable to return.

Therefore the caravan members were not refugees.


One of those is an example of rational deductive reasoning and the other is the kind of thing you do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
A right wing terrorist kills 50 people in a racist attack and we have people basically supporting the idea that the muslims killed were invaders in NZ to begin with.

You’re borderline beyond even responding to. You lie and warp things so pathetically that I’m not sure you even care about having rationale debate ever again. Or if you ever did. You’re the lowest of the low.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
You’re borderline beyond even responding to. You lie and warp things so pathetically that I’m not sure you even care about having rationale debate ever again. Or if you ever did. You’re the lowest of the low.
Its hard to understand how someone who is seemingly intelligent can debate things like FC does. Disingenuous is probably the best term for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
You’re borderline beyond even responding to. You lie and warp things so pathetically that I’m not sure you even care about having rationale debate ever again. Or if you ever did. You’re the lowest of the low.
only slightly above ninja, but every day he inches closer
 
1. NAZIs were socialists

2. NAZIs were committed to genocide

Therefore all socialists are committed to genocide.


1. Refugees are either forced to leave or unable to return.

2. The caravan was not forced to leave nor unable to return.

Therefore the caravan members were not refugees.


One of those is an example of rational deductive reasoning and the other is the kind of thing you do.
The kind of thing I do? Should I pull that exact same Nazi argument from almost every nut job on this site except they were being serious. Lol
 


"The crusades need to come back!"

Wonder why it's ok to push people to violence but as soon as they act you disavow them. People like Ben Shapiro need to just man up and applaud this fine young man who took his advice.
 
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5770516-The-Great-Replacement-New-Zealand-Shooter.html

Were/are you a conservative?
No, conservatism is corporatism in disguise, I want no part of it.

Were/are you a christian?
That is complicated.
When I know, I will tell you.

Were/are you a fascist?
Yes. For once, the person that will be called a fascist, is an actual fascist. I
am sure the journalists will love that.
I mostly agree with Sir Oswald Mosley’s views and consider myself an
Eco-fascist by nature.
The nation with the closest political and social values to my own is the
People’s Republic of China.


whats exactly is an eco-facsist?
 
Last edited:
Extremist right wing terrorism.
You couldn't be less concerned with the shooters motives or the victims. Your only goal is to insult conservatives. It's expected behavior from you at this point.

maybe you should take your own advice and reread the manifesto. these are not me spinning the news. It's the terrorists own words.

but you wont do any of that because you are a disingenuous troll.
 
You couldn't be less concerned with the shooters motives or the victims. Your only goal is to insult conservatives. It's expected behavior from you at this point.

maybe you should take your own advice and reread the manifesto. these are not me spinning the news. It's the terrorists own words.

but you wont do any of that because you are a disingenuous troll.
I didn't mention conservatives in that post. If you think conservatives are the same as extreme right wing terrorists I guess that's a pretty spicy take but it's not one I share.
 
$10 says 85 puts FC on ignore within the next week, and his little bitch wayne follows suit immediately because he is of course incapable of thinking for himself. They have both been embarrassed by FC far too much. How the hell can you even try to claim that Trump wasn't an inspiration for this, when the shooter literally says "trump was an inspiration". Why are red hats so goddamn stupid?
 
I didn't mention conservatives in that post. If you think conservatives are the same as extreme right wing terrorists I guess that's a pretty spicy take but it's not one I share.
Anyone know his motives for attacking the mosques? We apparently know his manifesto.
 
He wanted to inspire the internal destruction of the US and incite a civil war which fanatics like @fried-chicken are more than happy to help him with

Why do you still openly lie on here? Everyone knows you are completely full of shit and have zero problems lying to advance your political position. The gunman literally called Trump " 'a symbol of renewed white identity'"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why do you still openly lie on here? Everyone knows you are completely full of shit and have zero problems lying to advance your political position. The gunman literally called Trump " 'a symbol of renewed white identity'"

No wonder you ignored me, I make you look like the goddamn lying piece of shit that you are.
https://thehill.com/policy/internat...n-manifesto-he-supported-trump-as-a-symbol-of

One of the suspects in a pair of deadly New Zealand mosque shootings wrote in a manifesto that he supported President Trump "as a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose," according to The Washington Post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NinjaKnight
All of you white people disgust me.

An Australian travels to NZ to carry out a terrorist attack and liberals instantly blame Trump and the NRA. All becuase some shithead wrote about Trump online amongst other incoherent ramblings.

It’s just lunacy at this point. These people are nuts
 
An Australian travels to NZ to carry out a terrorist attack and liberals instantly blame Trump and the NRA. All becuase some shithead wrote about Trump online amongst other incoherent ramblings.

It’s just lunacy at this point. These people are nuts

Please tell me you are trolling at this point no one can possibly be this stupid.
 
Quick recap: 49 people were murdered by an open Trump supporter white supremacist terrorist.

1) Gal complains about AOC

2) 85 claims Trump had nothing to do with it, while in the very same post admits the terrorist gives credit to Trump.

3)Now all we need is @UCFWayne to make another brain dead analogy or post his usual "love Trump's hate" idiot post to complete our resident racist moron trifecta.

I only wish you inbred morons knew just how stupid you actually are.
 
Last edited:
Nearly mass assassinated 22 but actually assassinated 0. We can't even include near misses in the right wing terrorism number or the total would approach 9/11 numbers.
Yet the sandy hook shooter, colorado movie theater shooter, san bernardino terrorists, pulse nightclub shooter were all left wing terrorists. Keep cherry picking your facts.
 
You'll never be anything other than a hateful moron. These are people looking for a safe place to raise their families. It's not a foreign nation attacking our border. Get a grip you absolute psychopath.

Then why not come legally? Seems wrong to cut the line but if youre pandering for votes like the demokkkrats, then sure theyre just “refugees”
 
Yet the sandy hook shooter, colorado movie theater shooter, san bernardino terrorists, pulse nightclub shooter were all left wing terrorists. Keep cherry picking your facts.

His manifesto seems to indicate that he hoped a resulting crackdown on guns in the United States would produce a revolt or revolution among gun owners or perhaps whites in general.

This wasn't just about revenge, he wanted to help accelerate the West towards societal division along racial lines.

Personally I think he was a little overly optimistic about that. The only people who care enough to defy the state are nationalists. We are a minority. Regular whites, like good little sheep, will do exactly as they are told.

Yes it hurts our image somewhat, but we are already vilified as monsters so I don't see much difference there.

I don't regard any invaders into the West as innocent, though I do wish that children hadn't been involved in this, as they are brought by their parents and have no choice in the matter.

I feel like in America we are quickly heading towards the removal of free speech. Many don't think it can be done, but it was done in Canada, which previously had free speech under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. An exception was made to that Charter with regards to hate speech - of course in reality this nullifies your freedom of speech entirely.

We have to think about what we will do if the state does clamp down on nationalists even further.

The situation became intolerable a long time ago. Maybe things will polarize faster due to this event. We'll see.

We certainly can't continue to float along hoping the state will be nice to us, as our population shrinks year by year.
 
The only people who care enough to defy the state are nationalists. We are a minority. Regular whites, like good little sheep, will do exactly as they are told.

Yes it hurts our image somewhat, but we are already vilified as monsters so I don't see much difference there.

Yeah, you White Nationalists get such a bad rap from the media. :rolleyes:

I don't regard any invaders into the West as innocent...

For a moment I thought this sounded awfully racist but then I remembered that fab and 85 have said the same thing so I must be mistaken.

I feel like in America we are quickly heading towards the removal of free speech. Many don't think it can be done, but it was done in Canada, which previously had free speech under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. An exception was made to that Charter with regards to hate speech - of course in reality this nullifies your freedom of speech entirely.

Yeah, it’s a crying shame when some of us White guys can’t publically spew our venom at minorities anymore! I feel so shackled! :rolleyes:

We have to think about what we will do if the state does clamp down on nationalists even further. The situation became intolerable a long time ago. Maybe things will polarize faster due to this event. We'll see. We certainly can't continue to float along hoping the state will be nice to us, as our population shrinks year by year.

Be nice to us? What’s to worry about? I’m sure the emerging new majorities will treat us with the same compassion and respect we’ve always shown them.
 
Yeah, you White Nationalists get such a bad rap from the media. :rolleyes:



For a moment I thought this sounded awfully racist but then I remembered that fab and 85 have said the same thing so I must be mistaken.



Yeah, it’s a crying shame when some of us White guys can’t publically spew our venom at minorities anymore! I feel so shackled! :rolleyes:



Be nice to us? What’s to worry about? I’m sure the emerging new majorities will treat us with the same compassion and respect we’ve always shown them.

Hey nutbag, why don't you stop responding to the obvious racist troll account and stop ignorant attaching me and Fab to your worthless responses? I know you're butthurt that we keep reminding you that you called Fab a racist, lied repeatedly, and still refuse to admit this but get a girp already.
 
Hey nutbag, why don't you stop responding to the obvious racist troll account and stop ignorant attaching me and Fab to your worthless responses?

I could have sworn the use of the term, “invaders” was what started that discussion of what’s racist and what’s not. Am I wrong?
 
I could have sworn the use of the term, “invaders” was what started that discussion of what’s racist and what’s not. Am I wrong?
You're thinking of Drunk Uncle Wayne. He's the one that called refugees invaders.

Wayne is the human embodiment of political email chains from the 1990s that your drunk uncle would send. I might change his nickname to FWFWFWayne
 
  • Like
Reactions: NinjaKnight
That tweet. The guy started out on a stupid rant, but trump was responding to the question about what to do with the training camps where Islamist extremists are being trained to kill.
We have a problem in this country and it's called Muslims

"We need this question!"

That's before death training camps or whatever are event mentioned.
 
We have a problem in this country and it's called Muslims

"We need this question!"

That's before death training camps or whatever are event mentioned.

And that seems like a fair response. You may notice that all he did was lead the guy into what the question actually was going to be. The guy was an idiot for starting out that way, but he did propose a valid question in his second part and Trumps response was legitimate.
 
And that seems like a fair response. You may notice that all he did was lead the guy into what the question actually was going to be. The guy was an idiot for starting out that way, but he did propose a valid question in his second part and Trumps response was legitimate.
There's no evidence that any of the narrative you're creating is accurate.
 
Well, except the video.
No, you've created this shell of backstory to make it seem like Donald pulled some verbal jiu jitsu and redirected the question on the fly while simultaneously shutting down the racist part of the question (which included birtherism for ****s sake)

None of that exists in reality outside of your mind. Donald was asked a question, praised the question and answered the question.
 
No, you've created this shell of backstory to make it seem like Donald pulled some verbal jiu jitsu and redirected the question on the fly while simultaneously shutting down the racist part of the question (which included birtherism for ****s sake)

None of that exists in reality outside of your mind. Donald was asked a question, praised the question and answered the question.
You may have missed it, but he praised the question before it had been asked. At that point, nothing but a ridiculous statement had been made. We both know that he loved the setup because talking about the birther crap gets his base riled up, but his response to the ACTUAL question was fair, albeit vague and deferential.
 
You may have missed it, but he praised the question before it had been asked. At that point, nothing but a ridiculous statement had been made. We both know that he loved the setup because talking about the birther crap gets his base riled up, but his response to the ACTUAL question was fair, albeit vague and deferential.
9.9 in mental gymnastics. Small deduction for not blaming Hillary for this question.
 
ADVERTISEMENT