ADVERTISEMENT

The Biden Legacy, in a nutshell

Crazyhole

Crazyhole

Todd's Tiki Bar
Jun 4, 2004
23,824
9,586
113

Transgender surgery is now free for military, thanks to Biden executive order - Washington Examiner

Taxpayers will now foot the bill for gender reassignment surgery for active military personnel and veterans, with some treatments costing upward of $200,000 under an executive order signed by President Biden.Tucked inside Biden’s Jan. 25 transgender order, “Enabling All Qualified Americans to...
www.washingtonexaminer.com www.washingtonexaminer.com

Authoritarian executive action intended to encourage mentally disturbed individuals to join the military so they can have their genitals mutilated at the expense of the taxpayer.

Yep, this country is screwed.
 
Crazyhole said:
And here this whole time I thought you felt that we spend too much on the military. Huh.
Click to expand...
Yeah, there's gonna be a staggering bill from all the reassignment surgeries that are gonna pop up. :)

Here's one for you: For all the "Chelsea Mannings" in the military, I would bet that there are ten times as many women who want to become trans men. I've seen some documentaries about them -- and, trust me, you WANT them defending you if we go to war!
 
DaShuckster said:
Holy Moley! Who knew Crazy and _glaciers were a couple of Karens!!!
Click to expand...
this you?
DaShuckster said:
When it comes to trolling, do you think there's a level of satisfaction in it that's comparable to writing a thought-provoking post? I really have a hard time with understanding that. Doesn't there have to be some level of guilt in knowing that you've provoked somebody else just for the hell of it?
Click to expand...
DaShuckster said:
Excuse me? You want to know what my deal is lately? How about what's been YOUR deal lately?

How many threads on "rioting and looting" do we really need on Page 1?
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ucfmikes
DaShuckster said:
Oops, I think I hurt my little toadie troll's feelings. :)
Click to expand...
When it comes to hurting my feelings, do you think there's a level of satisfaction in it that's comparable to writing a thought-provoking post? I really have a hard time with understanding that. Doesn't there have to be some level of guilt in knowing that you've provoked somebody else just for the hell of it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crazyhole
Back to Biden. The rising gas prices are not going unnoticed. That alone could destroy him. I noticed now a nearly 75 cent per gallon increase over the past several weeks and a lot of people are very upset. I see that getting worse. Please don’t tell me that’s not on our president
 
_glaciers said:
When it comes to hurting my feelings, do you think there's a level of satisfaction in it that's comparable to writing a thought-provoking post? I really have a hard time with understanding that. Doesn't there have to be some level of guilt in knowing that you've provoked somebody else just for the hell of it?
Click to expand...
Well played
 
Poolside Knight said:
They are not handling the around 60% approval rating well. going deep in the culture war well to manufacture outrage
Click to expand...
He’s at 50% on CNN and 51% on Rasmussen and that’s with the media playing in his corner. Do you really think that’s going to hold as the border gets worse, the ME heats up, people realize that at $1400 payoff isn’t going to solve their problems, and he continues to dodge questions from reporters?
 
The 1400 will keep the masses happy for a couple of months, Gas won't hurt bad until they break the $3 barrier, so he likely has another 1 to 3 months there as well. Looking ahead 3 mos in dementia land, the 25th may be in play. He won't be getting any better and will at some point will get much worse. At timel will come, sooner rather than later, when his handlers and the willing press, won't be able to hide him, or his mental abilities away from the public.
 
goodknightfl said:
The 1400 will keep the masses happy for a couple of months, Gas won't hurt bad until they break the $3 barrier, so he likely has another 1 to 3 months there as well. Looking ahead 3 mos in dementia land, the 25th may be in play. He won't be getting any better and will at some point will get much worse. At timel will come, sooner rather than later, when his handlers and the willing press, won't be able to hide him, or his mental abilities away from the public.
Click to expand...
When it gets to that point, they will chalk up his "surprising" decline to him working so hard for the American people, and then commit to going even further in honor of what he was trying to accomplish. It'll sell to the left because it's a sympathy story and the right will be called insensitive to point out that it was obvious he has had dementia for months.
 
Your dementia crap didn't work before the election and it sure as hell isn't going to work when our President has engineered the passage of a bill that will significantly help Americans in financial distress.

No matter what poll you choose, a clear majority of Americans - Democrats, Republicans, and Independents - support it.

Republicans apparently aren't content with losing big in 2020, they want buck modern trends and lose big in 2022 too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poolside Knight
DaShuckster said:
Your dementia crap didn't work before the election and it sure as hell isn't going to work when our President has engineered the passage of a bill that will significantly help Americans in financial distress.

No matter what poll you choose, a clear majority of Americans - Democrats, Republicans, and Independents - support it.

Republicans apparently aren't content with losing big in 2020, they want buck modern trends and lose big in 2022 too.
Click to expand...
If Goldman Sachs projections end up correct these Chuds heads will explode . They make shit up or try to will a diagnosis into existence bc Biden is very difficult to attack
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaShuckster
So, let's say I get my wife who is north of 50 to join the Navy , can she get the Navy to pay for a tummy tuck, breasts implants and maybe do a little here and there? I mean she identifies as a 20 something super model trapped in a 50 year old body. Will the Navy pay for all these elective surgeries too? I don't honestly don't see the difference between these kinds of things and gender reassignment surgery because if I am dude who wants to be a dudete I get breasts implants as part of the package don't I? so, why can't military women get free boob jobs? They could add carbon fiber mesh to make them bullet proof too.
 
KNIGHTTIME^ said:
Unfortunately that isn't woke enough. He has got to pay for mentality sick folks an elective surgery.
Click to expand...
Your time machine has you stuck in the 1960s. We've learned more about human sexuality over the past 50 years than in all the centuries of mankind's existence before then.
 
who knew that the Rivals.com right wing grievance political eco system isn't real life
y90bwfR.png


 
  • Like
Reactions: OLearyLastCall
Crazyhole said:
NPR has him at 48%
Click to expand...
62% approve of his handling of the pandemic but 49% overall???!? That seems more than a little bit odd. 🤪

But in the article, NPR does mention that Biden's 49% is higher than Trump's ever was.

www.npr.org

Majority Approves Of Biden's Handling Of Pandemic, NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll Finds

Sixty-two percent approve of the job the president is doing handling the pandemic, but he gets a lower 49% overall job approval rating, signaling potentially tough legislative fights ahead.
www.npr.org www.npr.org
 
DaShuckster said:
62% approve of his handling of the pandemic but 49% overall???!? That seems more than a little bit odd. 🤪

But in the article, NPR does mention that Biden's 49% is higher than Trump's ever was.

www.npr.org

Majority Approves Of Biden's Handling Of Pandemic, NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist Poll Finds

Sixty-two percent approve of the job the president is doing handling the pandemic, but he gets a lower 49% overall job approval rating, signaling potentially tough legislative fights ahead.
www.npr.org www.npr.org
Click to expand...
Trump, huh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ucfmikes
Crazyhole said:
Trump, huh?
Click to expand...
Don't shoot the messenger. That's what the NPR article said:

"And while about half of Americans view him positively — his job approval rating is at 49%, which is higher than former President Donald Trump's ever was — that's not extraordinarily high, and it's lower than approval for the coronavirus bill. It signals that everything legislatively after this is likely going to be tougher, especially with the 60-vote threshold to overcome a filibuster still in effect for most legislation."
 
DaShuckster said:
Don't shoot the messenger. That's what the NPR article said:

"And while about half of Americans view him positively — his job approval rating is at 49%, which is higher than former President Donald Trump's ever was — that's not extraordinarily high, and it's lower than approval for the coronavirus bill. It signals that everything legislatively after this is likely going to be tougher, especially with the 60-vote threshold to overcome a filibuster still in effect for most legislation."
Click to expand...
Just kind of funny that this is the most important thing you took from the article. It's almost like you saw the name Trump and it evoked an involuntary response.
 
Crazyhole said:
Just kind of funny that this is the most important thing you took from the article. It's almost like you saw the name Trump and it evoked an involuntary response.
Click to expand...
Fascinating conjecture there, Crazy.

I'm curious, was the title of THIS THREAD the most important thing you took from the Washington Examiner article linked in your OP?

:) ;) :) ;) :)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Poolside Knight
DaShuckster said:
Fascinating conjecture there, Crazy.

I'm curious, was the title of THIS THREAD the most important thing you took from the Washington Examiner article linked in your OP?

:) ;) :) ;) :)
Click to expand...
Well I just assumed that since Biden is currently the commander in chief it seemed relevant. Certainly it's more relevant than the past approval ratings for someone that isn't currently an elected official.
 
Crazyhole said:
Well I just assumed that since Biden is currently the commander in chief it seemed relevant. Certainly it's more relevant than the past approval ratings for someone that isn't currently an elected official.
Click to expand...
On a similar vein, I just assumed that in a discussion of the current commander in chief’s job approval , the past occupant’s ratings were relevant. :p
 
Adding another bullet point to his legacy, Biden goes out an prattles on about non-partisan unity and then fires the heads of the EEOC and the NLRB. Those two agencies are independent of the Executive and their heads serve four year terms after Senate confirmation. They maintain their independence to a great degree because Presidents don’t remove them arbitrarily when they come into office. In the case of the EEOC head, Sharon Fast Gustafson, the WH tried to pressure her to resign for no apparent reason and she refused. So they fired her anyway. Playing this kind of politics with the EEOC sends quite the symbolic message.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crazyhole
sk8knight said:
Adding another bullet point to his legacy, Biden goes out an prattles on about non-partisan unity and then fires the heads of the EEOC and the NLRB.
Click to expand...
The EEOC has always been a political position. The only thing different about Gustafson, is that she violated the norm by not stepping down upon the inauguration of a new President.

And it's a real head-scratcher why Biden wouldn't keep Trump's appointee in a key civil rights job. 🙄
 
I don't mind the US taxpayer paying for transgender surgery, especially once they've been honorably discharged. Of any public servants, they are the most worthy.

My problem, which the Obama administration did not study (only costs), but the Trump administration did, is this ...

Military readiness, especially in combat roles, let alone the Marines, let alone their MEFs/MEUs.
The last are why women aren't in some combat roles.

So ...

What pisses everyone off, even those who are transgender serving, are Manning's lawyers arguing she cannot serve in jail because her Transgender Reassignment Surgery as if her 'quality of life' is like someone 'being on thir death bed' or with a 'chronic illness.'

Kinda undermines the entire argument of 'military readiness,' as not only the US military found ...
But the UK military, and many others, in equivalent combat roles to the US.

I.e.., especially the Royal Marine (RM) Commandos, which are equivalent to the USMC MEFs/MEUs.
E.g., unlike the USMC, you couldn't even join the RM if you were a woman until 2016 -- yes, 2016!

(no women have qualified to date either)

So when the US Media says, "Why don't we follow our allies lead?" I throw that right back at them.
We're not the only ones using the 'military readiness' argument.

The only 'studies' that were done prior during the Obama administration were 'cost' ones.
As our general healthcare system doesn't cover it, and it would be military-only.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

UCFChargeOn

Is Georgia the next Baylor?

Replies
24
Views
2K
The Dungeon - Knights Only
litehedded
L
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back