I'd like to start with that just a 2 week, and in the worst case, 4 week lockdown ... was going to stop the spread/secondary transmission, of SARS-CoV-2. It shouldn't be called 'misinformation' to merely 'call out' all the people 'moving the goal posts' at the highest levels. The extremely poor 'expectation setting' combined with the 'shifting the blame' is getting old.
As I said, once we reach 80%+ vaccination, they will say it's because people 'lack boosters,' or 'variants' or anything but to admit that -- as all of Pharma, the NIH and others admitted from the get-go with mRNA, but few media outlets reported -- there is no study that shows they will reduce the spread in secondary transmission.
I hope I'm wrong. But so far ... yeah, I don't trust sh-- coming out of the mouths of people who have made failed promise after promise, and then they turn around and 'blame' yet another category of people, or some 'circumstance.' All it shows is that they cannot predict anything, and have failed to study 130 years of coronavirus history.
Now that's the biggest truth of them all, they cannot predict anything.
As I said, once we reach 80%+ vaccination, they will say it's because people 'lack boosters,' or 'variants' or anything but to admit that -- as all of Pharma, the NIH and others admitted from the get-go with mRNA, but few media outlets reported -- there is no study that shows they will reduce the spread in secondary transmission.
I hope I'm wrong. But so far ... yeah, I don't trust sh-- coming out of the mouths of people who have made failed promise after promise, and then they turn around and 'blame' yet another category of people, or some 'circumstance.' All it shows is that they cannot predict anything, and have failed to study 130 years of coronavirus history.
Now that's the biggest truth of them all, they cannot predict anything.
