Trump is right about the FBI- see: Peter Strzok

[UCFKnight85]

Let's just review who Peter Strzok is and what he did:

- Senior official at the FBI
- We now know that he was a deranged, hysterical anti-Trump person who absolutely hated him going back to the Primary (via text messages recovered)
- He was front and center in the Clinton Email Investigation alongside Comey
- He was single handedly responsible for getting the Comey Memo wording changed. It was written to say "grossly negligent" which held huge legal implications, to "extremely careless". This was critical in the interpretation of the FBI investigation.
- He also assured that language was removed, stating that the FBI found that it was likely that numerous foreign actors accessed emails on Clinton's server
- In text exchanges, to other FBI personnel, he stated that he could not fathom Trump winning and referenced having an "insurance policy" to deal with Trump should he win.
- Strzok was the LEAD agent who received the now debunked Russia Dossier from the Clinton Campaign financed dirt digging organization. The ENTIRE investigation into "Russia!" started with Peter Strzok, using this now discredited Clinton funded dossier, to convince the DOJ that they had to investigate the Trump campaign

And then, this compromised agent was appointed to the Muller Investigation, which supposedly was supposed be "totally impartial and free of any Conflicts of Interest".

He has since been kicked off the counsel once his texts came to light, but he was the lead questioner of Michael Flynn.

And yet, people bitch that Trump criticizes the FBI. Wonder why? It could be that the agency was totally compromised by this one single man who obsessively hated Trump all along

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/17/anti-trump-fbi-agent-peter-strzok-had-eye-popping-/

 

[Bob the Citronaut]

No bid deal. Nothing to see here.

 

[NinjaKnight]

If I trust anyone to give a clear and unbiased opinion on politics, 85 is my guy.

 

[UCFKnight85]

If I trust anyone to give a clear and unbiased opinion on politics, 85 is my guy.

LOL

Don't read the facts or the basis presented; whine about me instead.

Is this where you insult me and do anything possible to deflect away from the actual story?

 

[NinjaKnight]

LOL

Don't read the facts or the basis presented; whine about me instead.

Is this where you insult me and do anything possible to deflect away from the actual story?

Why would I do that? I just said you have a proven track record of never lying or exaggerating any of your always unbiased view points. Let's just look at the thread about Al frankens sexual abuse, or the Kentucky State Rep. Both of those threads are wonderful examples of you always posting 100% truth, and never outright lying. So I feel like I can take what you have posted in this thread as absolute fact. Thanks!

 

[UCFRogerz]

ffs.

 

[barrister1602]

Na

 

[barrister1602]

Who was the fbi dude with wife also involved?

 

[UCFKnight85]

Why would I do that? I just said you have a proven track record of never lying or exaggerating any of your always unbiased view points. Let's just look at the thread about Al frankens sexual abuse, or the Kentucky State Rep. Both of those threads are wonderful examples of you always posting 100% truth, and never outright lying. So I feel like I can take what you have posted in this thread as absolute fact. Thanks!

You have honestly lost your mind

 

[NinjaKnight]

You have honestly lost your mind

Straight to step 4.

Classic you.

 

[Bob the Citronaut]

Who was the fbi dude with wife also involved?

Him and his mistress (FBI lawyer) were texting back and forth about the "insurance policy" if Trump is elected, how they had to protect Hillary, etc.

Bruce Ohr (DOJ official) and his wife are the ones tied up with FusionGPS and the Dem collusion with the Russians.

 

[UCFKnight85]

Him and his mistress (FBI lawyer) were texting back and forth about the "insurance policy" if Trump is elected, how they had to protect Hillary, etc.

Bruce Ohr (DOJ official) and his wife are the ones tied up with FusionGPS and the Dem collusion with the Russians.

Nothing to see here. We have FBI lawyers and top ranking officials discussing having an "insurance policy" for a freely elected President they don't like. Nothing to see at all.

That same person is the guy who took a fake dossier and launched this entire Russia investigation, which has conveniently leaked only anti-Trump tidbits and sometimes fake news. Which is probably the "insurance policy" referenced.

Nothing to see.

 

[UCFWayne]

 

[UCFKnight85]

The WSJ has a new report out basically saying that this guy truly was a partisan, and that "insurance policy" definitely was using the Russia investigation to have Trump removed from office.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/in-fbi...licy-text-referred-to-russia-probe-1513624580

Mind you that text was from Summer 2016. A year and a half before the election this guy was already scheming on how to torpedo Trump should he win.

 

[UCFBS]

As with anything Trump says, there is always some truth to it. Usually it's him just being a boisterous RealityTV star, nothing more than a modicum from a select viewpoint.

Unfortunately, in this case, these people were a real problem that touched a lot of issues. And they aren't the only ones, just the ones that have been outed.

One of the reasons OPM is so sacked right now with background investigations -- which has completely paralyzed the cleared space since late 2015 (largely prompted by various investigations) -- is because the Obama administration set extremely poor precedents, and let a lot of crap through, especially during his first administration, most out of policies set in 2009.

So a lot of agencies are stuck with a lot of crap they cannot get rid of.

Most had to do with Obama expanding other agencies that ultimately fall under DHS, including DHS itself. The Obama administration redefinition of "domestic terrorism" that smacked of the '50s and '60s, almost a reversal of history, now focused on loosely defined "nationalism groups" (which meant most every American qualified, especially white, even more so than known, undocumented resident syndicates), is why the terrorist watch list and other federal lists ballooned 10x over even when W. left office.

They are now, quite appropriately, called "turn in your neighbor lists."

At the FBI, there was a clear "new generation" dislike among experienced officers, especially those that went through all the hoops, let alone the inter-agency issues, especially with the DoJ, but also beyond given how FBI operates v. the DHS umbrella of agencies. Worst of all, it led to a greatly reduced ethos and ethic, which will take along time to be 'cleared out'. But there is just so much on their plates.

E.g., it wasn't a surprise that the Pulse Nightclub shooter wasn't taken more seriously than the few investigations. They just don't have the time, plus he was 'cleared' by DHS for security of their facilities (again, inter-agency issues).

It's a total mess, with people wanting to 'do the right thing,' but they cannot. Which is why the morale is completely drained there. Because unlike virtually all other agencies, the FBI is known for their very high standards in just about every way -- true 'lifers' and not these in'n out contractors and others.

E.g., It's not a surprise Snowden, despite some of his family's history, never worked directly for the FBI.

Hillary Clinton completely refusing to follow the State, then even NSA and DoDs requirements, followed by the DoJ stomping on their investigations into her total disregard for the terms of her SSBI agreements, was really just the 'straw that broke the camel's back' ... in public.

You never hear about it in public, but Obama's DoJ and DHS did the FBI 10x worse than anything talked about with the W. administration.

 

[UCFKnight85]

And now we find that the Mueller team quite possibly obtained thousands of transition emails illegally.

 

[UCF11and1]

And now we find that the Mueller team quite possibly obtained thousands of transition emails illegally.

Is that a problem? They should give them to Wikileaks

 

[NinjaKnight]

[

Is that a problem? They should give them to Wikileaks

It wasn't a problem when they were Clinton's emails they obtained illegally. But of course if it's the FBI doing it yes that's a problem.

 

[Bob the Citronaut]

[


It wasn't a problem when they were Clinton's emails they obtained illegally. But of course if it's the FBI doing it yes that's a problem.

Yes, the Russians hacking the DNC and/or Killary's unsecure server is the same as the US government doing it to an incoming administration.

 

[UCFBS]

It wasn't a problem when they were Clinton's emails they obtained illegally.

A lot of the InfoSec space had a copy of her e-mails.

More than one iteration of her server was all over the blackhole lists, including one having a full set of marks for being easily compromised. Yes, various 'good samaritans' on the Internet actually test servers on the Internet, it's part of the long-standing known etiquette and acceptance of having SMTP and related support services on the Internet, and it was cake to snoop things like her password, among others.

It's part of the reason the NSA ripped her a new one, and she changed some of her early IT contractors.

But of course if it's the FBI doing it yes that's a problem.

It all depends on what clearances, agreements and other things were signed.

In the case of Clinton, she had a signed SSBI, so she accepted things (of which are not for public discourse). So did several of her staff. It always gets muddy when it comes to spouses and families, because they don't sign those agreements, even though they are named in them and have similar background checks (again, well known public information).

E.g., the questions around investigating the notebook of the Weiner, while his wife was under an agreement, and the FBI took the 'safe road' and got a warrant.

I.e., The new question is what agreements were signed during that period, and what staff was under what agreements.

 

[NinjaKnight]

Yes, the Russians hacking the DNC and/or Killary's unsecure server is the same as the US government doing it to an incoming administration.

Did you read my second sentence? Are you even capable of reading?

 

[Knight_Light]

Who was the fbi dude with wife also involved?

That was McCabe, the Deputy Director of the FBI...as over $500,000 was given to his wife's failed VA State Senate run that was funneled and controlled by Clinton's Alley...and he of course didn't recuse himself from the Clinton investigation.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/terry-mcauliffes-pac-donated-to-campaign-of-fbi-officials-wife/


McCabe testified in a closed door 7.5 hr Congressional Committee session yesterday.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/19/politics/congress-russia-fbi-deputy-director/index.html

 

[goodknightfl]

The FBI like the IRS have been Obamatized.

 

[UCFBS]

The FBI like the IRS have been Obamatized.

A house cleansing is coming at the IRS. Heck, the simplified tax code and reduced attacks on small businesses should reduce some headcount at the IRS.

And if there is one thing I've learned about Millennials and even late Gen-X'ers, in both gov't and media, they really don't understand why they have to care about "conflicts-of-interest." Even Reality TV stars don't, including the President.

The whole purpose of recusal is to remove oneself from even being able to be seen as influencing or otherwise partisan. It's a protection for oneself.