He's a traitor to the constitution, as are his followers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TDS!
Love this president. The uptight left wing extremists just can’t handle this humor. Their stuck up heads are so far up their asses that they literally shit their brains
How does anyone even like this guy. You've got to be a complete moron and have psychological issues. FRUMP = GARBAGE
There’s a line if he makes clearly racist comments. That’s one example. Clear comments that are not open to interpretationSerious question - at what point would you have problems with POTUS publicly joking about this sort of thing? Where would you draw a line? Is there a line?
Psychological issues you say?? Who other than you and Disney characters even use this terminology. You literally have the mentality and social skills of a child. SeriouslyFRUMP
What if it's a joke though? Would a "clearly racist" statement made as part of a joke be OK because it was a joke?There’s a line if he makes clearly racist comments. That’s one example. Clear comments that are not open to interpretation
When we're talking about comedians like Dave Chappelle, I whole-heartedly protect their "everything and everybody is fair game for comedy" assertion, no matter what the comedian's political leanings.What if it's a joke though? Would a "clearly racist" statement made as part of a joke be OK because it was a joke?
He's right. Calling someone Frump = garbage.Psychological issues you say?? Who other than you and Disney characters even use this terminology. You literally have the mentality and social skills of a child. Seriously
I agree. Frump has no basis in reality -- same as Trump. The family's correct surname is Drumpf.He's right. Calling someone Frump = garbage.
It depends on the context, but it would probably not be OK. Some things you don’t joke about. Like the Holocaust. I hear that all the time from Democrats like AOC.What if it's a joke though? Would a "clearly racist" statement made as part of a joke be OK because it was a joke?
It’s a joke you degenerate pedophileGlad to hear that the constitution is a joke to some of you basement dwellers.
Holocaust jokes are over-the-line but White Supremacists who marched through Charlottesville with torches shouting vile things about Jews weren't that bad?It depends on the context, but it would probably not be OK. Some things you don’t joke about. Like the Holocaust. ...
I don’t think even Trump would cross that line. I hardly thought that those comments in Charlottesville were Earth shattering to people without TDS.
McCain did not like Trump but he wasn't anywhere close to being as crass or as crude in his remarks as Trump was. When Trump refused to call McCain a war hero and said he liked war heroes "who didn't get captured," do you think that atrocious swipe only applied to McCain and not to all the POWs who've loyally served our country under horrible conditions?As far as the McCain jokes, he’s not a military guy and didn’t like him. He NEVER would say something nice and McCain and his family were the same way about Trump.
We are talking about Trump jokes dummy. Follow the argumentHolocaust jokes are over-the-line but White Supremacists who marched through Charlottesville with torches shouting vile things about Jews weren't that bad?
Why don’t you refresh your memory about some of McCain’s daughter’s comments It was directed at McCain. It was a personal backhand comment directed at HIM. STOP DRAWING YOUR OWN CONCLUSIONSMcCain did not like Trump but he wasn't anywhere close to being as crass or as crude in his remarks as Trump was. When Trump refused to call McCain a war hero and said he liked war heroes "who didn't get captured," do you think that atrocious swipe only applied to McCain and not to all the POWs who've loyally served our country under horrible conditions?
Trump didn't joke about liking war heroes who weren't captured?We are talking about Trump jokes dummy. Follow the argument
What argument are you trying to make now? You went from an executive order about Biden joke to racism, to the Holocaust to McCain??Trump didn't joke about liking war heroes who weren't captured?
LOL--who was the guy who has 'joked' about an executive order about Biden ... about racism and White Nationalists shouting vile things about Jews ... about John McCain's war hero status? If you want focus, please tell that to your President.What argument are you trying to make now? You went from an executive order about Biden joke to racism, to the Holocaust to McCain??
Try to stay focused
Your resident sociopathic, serial killer, pedophile, TDS-obsessed, buddy Ninjaknight said that Trump is going against the constitution by jokingly talking about Biden.LOL--who was the guy who has 'joked' about an executive order about Biden ... about racism and White Nationalists shouting vile things about Jews ... about John McCain's war hero status? If you want focus, please tell that to your President.
It depends on the context, but it would probably not be OK. Some things you don’t joke about. Like the Holocaust. I hear that all the time from Democrats like AOC.
I don’t think even Trump would cross that line. I hardly thought that those comments in Charlottesville were Earth shattering to people without TDS.
As far as the McCain jokes, he’s not a military guy and didn’t like him. He NEVER would say something nice and McCain and his family were the same way about Trump. He’s speaks his mind and the people who want a “presidential” POTUS can’t handle that.
As POTUS, would it be acceptable to "joke" about nuking China?
I see a huge difference in things that are distasteful vs things are harmful to democratic norms or national security. I don't think a circumstance exists where a POTUS is justified in publicly "joking" about serving more than two terms. I'd say that's the equivalent to joking about confiscating everyone's guns, or joking about banning religion, or joking about ending the first amendment.
Here's the problem. From your perspective, Trump is not an existential threat. So you see those third term jokes, or lock her up chants, or all the other norm-breaking things Trump does as harmless. And if someone views them as dangerous, you rationalize away their argument as TDS.
The problem is this - if someone actually wanted to jail political enemies, silence the press, and find a way to a third term, this normalization would be a key step in that process. Which is why joking about it - in public - should be unacceptable. This is how frogs are boiled.
I see your point, but honestly, I don’t think Trump wants to be president for a second term, let alone more.As POTUS, would it be acceptable to "joke" about nuking China?
I see a huge difference in things that are distasteful vs things are harmful to democratic norms or national security. I don't think a circumstance exists where a POTUS is justified in publicly "joking" about serving more than two terms. I'd say that's the equivalent to joking about confiscating everyone's guns, or joking about banning religion, or joking about ending the first amendment.
Here's the problem. From your perspective, Trump is not an existential threat. So you see those third term jokes, or lock her up chants, or all the other norm-breaking things Trump does as harmless. And if someone views them as dangerous, you rationalize away their argument as TDS.
The problem is this - if someone actually wanted to jail political enemies, silence the press, and find a way to a third term, this normalization would be a key step in that process. Which is why joking about it - in public - should be unacceptable. This is how frogs are boiled.
As POTUS, would it be acceptable to "joke" about nuking China?
I see a huge difference in things that are distasteful vs things are harmful to democratic norms or national security. I don't think a circumstance exists where a POTUS is justified in publicly "joking" about serving more than two terms. I'd say that's the equivalent to joking about confiscating everyone's guns, or joking about banning religion, or joking about ending the first amendment.
Here's the problem. From your perspective, Trump is not an existential threat. So you see those third term jokes, or lock her up chants, or all the other norm-breaking things Trump does as harmless. And if someone views them as dangerous, you rationalize away their argument as TDS.
The problem is this - if someone actually wanted to jail political enemies, silence the press, and find a way to a third term, this normalization would be a key step in that process. Which is why joking about it - in public - should be unacceptable. This is how frogs are boiled.
I see your point, but honestly, I don’t think Trump wants to be president for a second term, let alone more.
I think what your saying is that him “throwing it out there” would be a step to it actually happening. This may be true in another country like Venezuela, Russia, etc., but not in the United States. Honestly, I think most Republicans just blow it off as Trump being Trump. It so much doesn’t even phase me
Here's the problem, you're constructing some grand hypothetical based off of no evidence other than an obvious joke.
Get over yourself, pedophile.
Yawn.President Trump on Wednesday suggested that he might not accept the election results if he is not declared the winner in November.
So much for "iTS jUsT a JoKe"
Trump Declines To Promise Peaceful Transfer Of Power After Election
Earlier in the day, the president said he expects this year's election results to go to the Supreme Court, defending his push to swiftly replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.www.npr.org
The irony of any of you pedoterrorists whining about “not accepting election results” after what you’ve pulled the last 4 years 😂President Trump on Wednesday suggested that he might not accept the election results if he is not declared the winner in November.
So much for "iTS jUsT a JoKe"
Trump Declines To Promise Peaceful Transfer Of Power After Election
Earlier in the day, the president said he expects this year's election results to go to the Supreme Court, defending his push to swiftly replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.www.npr.org