ADVERTISEMENT

Trump Will Host Next G7 Summit at His Doral Resort

Name me a Mayor, a City Councilman, a County Board member, or a Governor who would get away with such a blatant conflict of interest. Of course, the nature of the event will likely require more high-end suites and other accommodations.

Anyone want to bet me who pays for them? Will it be the government or Trump?

Also, I'd be willing to bet that Russia's Putin will expect Trump to invite him to the party to make it the G8 again. Mark my words.
 
Lmao at the "hypocrisy" thread.

Jesus christ imagine being a trump fan in 2019. Brain dead or traitor, or both.
 
72862491_1167412246788355_6224010419153928192_n.jpg
 
Considering that we seem to think that only career politicians and govvies need apply for government positions nowadays, I’m pretty sure it’s pretty rare in the federal government.

If he can prove that the services are rendered at cost and there is no profit, do you still have an issue with it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
You've got to be kidding me.
No, I’m seriously asking the question. I’m fully aware of the laws but put those aside for a second. If there’s no enrichment and it saves money, can you articulate your problem with it?
 
No, I’m seriously asking the question. I’m fully aware of the laws but put those aside for a second.
For the sake of this discussion you want to set aside the Constitution of the United States that this decision violates???!?
If there’s no enrichment...
If there's no enrichment??!? WTF? The government would be paying Trump for everyone to stay at his resort for crying out loud!!! How is THAT not enrichment??!?!
...and it saves money, can you articulate your problem with it?
How in the hell would it 'save' money??!?! You're saying Doral would be 'cheaper' than having everyone stay at Camp David like they did the last time the summit was held in the US? Really?
 
For the sake of this discussion you want to set aside the Constitution of the United States that this decision violates???!? If there's no enrichment??!? WTF? The government would be paying Trump for everyone to stay at his resort for crying out loud!!! How is THAT not enrichment??!?!How in the hell would it 'save' money??!?! You're saying Doral would be 'cheaper' than having everyone stay at Camp David like they did the last time the summit was held in the US? Really?
Probably not but could be. Do you know how much Camp David costs? I don’t.

As for the rest, relax, it’s a hypothetical. Besides, Trump isn’t getting rich off the G7 conference. It’s not like his company is getting $1.5 billion for it.
 
Probably not but could be. Do you know how much Camp David costs? I don’t.
Our government owns Camp David. It is technically a military facility. So the cost would be considerably cheaper than renting out a private resort.
 
Our government owns Camp David. It is technically a military facility. So the cost would be considerably cheaper than renting out a private resort.
You’re assuming that Trump would make them pay for the facility rental at Doral. If they only paid the operating costs and not the facilities rental, that at cost would be in the realm and might even be cheaper due to having to bring in outside catering, security (well that’s probably augmented in either place), etc. Also, just because the military owns it doesn’t mean that they won’t still charge the G7 budget for usage of the facility.

It doesn’t really matter that much to me in the end. I was just hoping to have a conversation about emoluments and what enriching yourself off the office meant but I guess that’s not going to happen.
 
And this is the part where Trump claims victory for solving this problem by dropping his resort. And his literal brain dead supporters cheer him for solving this latest crisis, of course they aren't intelligent enough to realize it's a crisis he created in first place by attempting to violate federal law.

Rinse and repeat, he follows the exact same brain dead pattern for his entire presidency, and there are still people out there dumb enough to think he's solving problems.
 
Last edited:
Just stick all those world leaders in a tent in the woods

Screw Doral. It’s against the law!!!!! :scream::weary::cop:

The sky is falling!!! We are doomed!!!
 
Doral canceled,
It's been a hell of a week from Trump:

Trump greenlights Eurdogan's invasion/ethnic cleansing. Oops!
Then: Cease fire, baby!!! Damn I'm awesome at this peace negotiation stuff!

Trump's COS confirms with reporters that there was indeed a Quid Pro Quo with Ukraine. Oops!
Nevermind, Mulvaney 'clarified' his previous statements. No harm, no foul.

Trump announces Doral for the next Summit. Oops!
Trump reverses after "Media & Democrat Crazed and Irrational Hostility" towards the idea (plus one of Trump's aides might have pointed out to him that it was ILLEGAL.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: NinjaKnight
You’re assuming that Trump would make them pay for the facility rental at Doral. If they only paid the operating costs and not the facilities rental, that at cost would be in the realm and might even be cheaper due to having to bring in outside catering, security (well that’s probably augmented in either place), etc. Also, just because the military owns it doesn’t mean that they won’t still charge the G7 budget for usage of the facility.

It doesn’t really matter that much to me in the end. I was just hoping to have a conversation about emoluments and what enriching yourself off the office meant but I guess that’s not going to happen.
Wow.
 
Lots of TDS over nothing. What else is new?

Surprised people aren’t contemplating suicide over this, or are they?
 
Literally (word for word) a violation of the Constitution and you say "over nothing". You either aren't paying attention or the Constitution doesn't mean anything to you anymore.

lol what actually happened here? You’re obsessing over an event that did not actually occur

your takes here are just as shitty as your clamoring for Mack to start at QB every single week
 
lol what actually happened here?
Trump wanted to use his position as President and host of the G7 Summit to showcase his Doral resort to the World.

You’re obsessing over an event that did not actually occur
That's because using your position as President to benefit your family business is a blatant violation of the US Constitution. This time, Trump's plan was so egregious that even his Republican allies were having a hard time defending it -- so His Lordship punted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluechip12
lol what actually happened here? You’re obsessing over an event that did not actually occur

your takes here are just as shitty as your clamoring for Mack to start at QB every single week

You just like corruption and not being able to score in the red zone.

SAD!
 
This is like the easiest thing ever to criticize Trump over that he's done as POTUS. There's zero conservative/liberal angle here at all. No underlying policy you might favor. So easy that he backed off because House Republicans said they couldn't defend the decision.

Corruption behind closed doors is bad. Corruption in the open is 10x worse. Why? Because it becomes normalized. Most of us are pretty cynical, right? We have low opinions of politicians and assume they are using their power to enrich themselves privately. Then when we see a congressman indicted for insider trading, we feel a little better that these guys aren't above the law. You have to make efforts to hide those corrupt acts or there will be consequences. A world where blatant corruption and self-dealing can be done in public, by the most powerful person in the country, with no consequences - is a whole new world.

This isn't even a slippery slope argument. Sure, the corruption can get worse - but that doesn't make this act not-corrupt. Not divesting, letting your kids run the business, etc is the slippery slope. This was end-game level corruption and thankfully House Republicans recognized this as well.

48 CFR 3.601
(a) Except as specified in 3.602, a contracting officer shall not knowingly award a contract to a Government employee or to a business concern or other organization owned or substantially owned or controlled by one or more Government employees. This policy is intended to avoid any conflict of interest that might arise between the employees’ interests and their Government duties, and to avoid the appearance of favoritism or preferential treatment by the Government toward its employees


 
Trump wanted to use his position as President and host of the G7 Summit to showcase his Doral resort to the World.

That's because using your position as President to benefit your family business is a blatant violation of the US Constitution. This time, Trump's plan was so egregious that even his Republican allies were having a hard time defending it -- so His Lordship punted.

[roll] Do we really need to rehash how feckless Hunter Biden became a millionaire on the backs of the Ukraine and China for doing nothing of value when daddy was VP?

Since you're so concerned about using power to benefit family and all!
 
[roll] Do we really need to rehash how feckless Hunter Biden became a millionaire on the backs of the Ukraine and China for doing nothing of value when daddy was VP?
After getting punked for your earlier ‘no big deal’ response, you’re going to respond to Trump’s blatant disrespect for the Constitution by...bringing up the son of a former VEEP?

Christ, you literally cannot admit when you’re wrong, can you?
 
This is like the easiest thing ever to criticize Trump over that he's done as POTUS. There's zero conservative/liberal angle here at all. No underlying policy you might favor. So easy that he backed off because House Republicans said they couldn't defend the decision.

Corruption behind closed doors is bad. Corruption in the open is 10x worse. Why? Because it becomes normalized. Most of us are pretty cynical, right? We have low opinions of politicians and assume they are using their power to enrich themselves privately. Then when we see a congressman indicted for insider trading, we feel a little better that these guys aren't above the law. You have to make efforts to hide those corrupt acts or there will be consequences. A world where blatant corruption and self-dealing can be done in public, by the most powerful person in the country, with no consequences - is a whole new world.

This isn't even a slippery slope argument. Sure, the corruption can get worse - but that doesn't make this act not-corrupt. Not divesting, letting your kids run the business, etc is the slippery slope. This was end-game level corruption and thankfully House Republicans recognized this as well.

48 CFR 3.601
(a) Except as specified in 3.602, a contracting officer shall not knowingly award a contract to a Government employee or to a business concern or other organization owned or substantially owned or controlled by one or more Government employees. This policy is intended to avoid any conflict of interest that might arise between the employees’ interests and their Government duties, and to avoid the appearance of favoritism or preferential treatment by the Government toward its employees



Perfectly explained.
 
meh there are plenty of great places to have the event at.
Duh. The very notion that the Trump Doral National was 'the best' to begin with was laughable. First, its inland and not on a Florida beach, two it's in decline, three, planes to & from Miami International fly over it on a regular basis, and four, it doesn't have enough high-end suites to handle the event (oh, but Government-sponsored renovations would have taken care of that little detail.)

Thank Goodness this is one stupid Trump controversy that we can put to bed.
 
Duh. The very notion that the Trump Doral National was 'the best' to begin with was laughable. First, its inland and not on a Florida beach, two it's in decline, three, planes to & from Miami International fly over it on a regular basis, and four, it doesn't have enough high-end suites to handle the event (oh, but Government-sponsored renovations would have taken care of that little detail.)

Thank Goodness this is one stupid Trump controversy that we can put to bed.
lots of good locations down there. that said, if the doral location were cheaper than the others, i dont see the problem. id rather the gov spend less money. hope whatever location they choose is cheaper than what doral quoted.
 
lots of good locations down there. that said, if the doral location were cheaper than the others, i dont see the problem.
How the hell do you know it's 'cheaper'? Because Trump said so? If 'cheapest' is the priority, then Camp David is the no-brainer choice because we own it.

Jesus, Wayne, I'm literally blown away by your indifference to a blatant conflict-of-interest. If we were talking about a city-sponsored conference and your city council picked the Mayor's hotel versus the other 35 in the community, you wouldn't see 'a problem' with that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NinjaKnight
How the hell do you know it's 'cheaper'? Because Trump said so? If 'cheapest' is the priority, then Camp David is the no-brainer choice because we own it.

Jesus, Wayne, I'm literally blown away by your indifference to a blatant conflict-of-interest. If we were talking about a city-sponsored conference and your city council picked the Mayor's hotel versus the other 35 in the community, you wouldn't see 'a problem' with that?
camp david isnt "free" it all has a cost. all im saying it go with the cheap option. if its trumps hotel fine, if its not thats ok too.

in case you forgot, we have a massive debt. we need to slow down the spending.
 
camp david isnt "free" it all has a cost. all im saying it go with the cheap option. if its trumps hotel fine, if its not thats ok too.

in case you forgot, we have a massive debt. we need to slow down the spending.
Really? You're going to keep chewing on this bone?

Damn, this reversal really sucks for balancing our federal budget, huh? :)
 
Really? You're going to keep chewing on this bone?

Damn, this reversal really sucks for balancing our federal budget, huh? :)
your reading comprehension is terrible. probably due to your advanced age.

must have missed that last part where i said go where ever is cheaper because i dont really care.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT