ADVERTISEMENT

UCFs Response to an expanded playoff….

mattropolis

Diamond Knight
Jan 7, 2002
11,689
5,941
113
Much like LIV Golf being the impetus for the PGA changing, we were a major piece in pushing the narrative of a real playoff past the finish line. People might not want to acknowledge it but our success (and treatment) was an eyesore on the game.

You’re welcome college football! -Signed UCF

Knight Nation should flood the internet with Danny White’s “National Champs” clip.

I still have a lot of questions about whatever this 12 team format will look like, and how it is executed.
 
love it

the only thing I disagree with is first and second round should be On Campus of higher seed ..not just the 1st round games
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFhonors
I think its too many teams. There typically arent 12 teams that are really national championship contenders. I would have gone with 6 teams. The 5 P5 champions and the highest ranked G5 team (or possibly just an at large since the better G5 programs will be P5 by then) . If they had done it that way, then the conference championship games are essentially playoff games, so you would really have just as many playoff games, without potentially lessening the impact of some regular season games.
 
I think its too many teams. There typically arent 12 teams that are really national championship contenders. I would have gone with 6 teams. The 5 P5 champions and the highest ranked G5 team (or possibly just an at large since the better G5 programs will be P5 by then) . If they had done it that way, then the conference championship games are essentially playoff games, so you would really have just as many playoff games, without potentially lessening the impact of some regular season games.
There aren't 64 "real". national championship contenders in NCAA basketball annually. But they are included in March Madness and... IT WORKS!
 
There aren't 64 "real". national championship contenders in NCAA basketball annually. But they are included in March Madness and... IT WORKS!

It works for the postseason but the regular season kind of sucks IMO, since even "big games" dont really matter that much since you know both teams are going to be in the postseason anyway. What makes college football so good is that every game can be the difference in making the post season or not. Ohio State getting upset by Purdue in a January basketball game, is not the same thing as Ohio State getting upset by Purdue in an October football game.
 
It works for the postseason but the regular season kind of sucks IMO, since even "big games" dont really matter that much since you know both teams are going to be in the postseason anyway. What makes college football so good is that every game can be the difference in making the post season or not. Ohio State getting upset by Purdue in a January basketball game, is not the same thing as Ohio State getting upset by Purdue in an October football game.
Since we are talking about 12 teams in football and not 64, I think those "big games" will still matter during the regular season in NCAA football.
 
Since we are talking about 12 teams in football and not 64, I think those "big games" will still matter during the regular season in NCAA football.

To an extent obviously, but take OSU Michigan last year. Obviously due to the rivalry it is a big game every year, but last season it was essentially a playoff game since the winner was likely going to the playoff and the loser not. With 12 teams both are going to the playoffs, so it might impact seeding or something certainly, but I think it takes away some of the drama so to speak.
 
Playoff is still going to be a scam. Six teams get auto-bids but only 4 get a bye. The committee gets to pick the 4, I assume. Garbage. Nobody should get a bye.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFhonors
E3jp477WYAE0m4n
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFhonors
Yeah id rather Neutral sites as close to middle of teams that playing as possible. People don’t want bowls to lose out so use current Bowls and rotate who hosts every year. Even the Bahamas Bowl should host once in a while.
 
Since we are talking about 12 teams in football and not 64, I think those "big games" will still matter during the regular season in NCAA football.
There are about 1/3 the # of Football schools in BBS as there are BB schools in division 1.
 
I would have adopted the Division II and FCS formats at 24 teams. I have always been a proponent of a 16 team format with all Division I conference champions getting an auto bid and then have 6 at large . I am sticking with my UCF roots and believe in a system that is more inclusive and ultimately leads to more parity across college football. Why shouldn't Coastal Carolina or Northern Illinois have a shot if they win their conferences?
 
That's optimistic. We've already seen the regular season start to matter less with the expansion of the "playoff" from 2 to 4.
I disagree if you make so the conference champions get automatic bids , it will make winning the conference all that much more important. We shouldn't want perfection in college football ,we should strive for competition.

If Alabama say didn't have to be perfect and just win the SEC maybe they schedule more challenging out of conference games? Maybe these schools like FSU and LSU actually take on a real home and home series ? The system as it stands now rewards perfection not competition. The pressure is off in some ways if you just win your conference.
 
I disagree if you make so the conference champions get automatic bids , it will make winning the conference all that much more important. We shouldn't want perfection in college football ,we should strive for competition.

If Alabama say didn't have to be perfect and just win the SEC maybe they schedule more challenging out of conference games? Maybe these schools like FSU and LSU actually take on a real home and home series ? The system as it stands now rewards perfection not competition. The pressure is off in some ways if you just win your conference.
Bye weeks home field will help as well.
 
Look these team change players every year. The same team in week0/1 of any given season is not the same by week 12. They grew matured learned or executed key plays better etc. The current setup is perfection from August through January any growning pains is an immediate DQ. I dont think it truly represents the best team. It has however concentrated the top recruits to 3-4 teams. Ultimately this concentration if allowed to continue will kill the sport. Even the top knows it.

If its so unfair to have all 10 confrence champions then why doesn't bama leave the SEC for the Sun Belt? They are sure to win every year the next 3 years until the recruiting dries up. As Kirby Smart says we have better players than you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattropolis
I would have adopted the Division II and FCS formats at 24 teams. I have always been a proponent of a 16 team format with all Division I conference champions getting an auto bid and then have 6 at large . I am sticking with my UCF roots and believe in a system that is more inclusive and ultimately leads to more parity across college football. Why shouldn't Coastal Carolina or Northern Illinois have a shot if they win their conferences?
100% agree. I'll one-up you....

16 teams doesn't even have to get retardedly complicated. It's already greatly in place. Nobody gets a bye-week. You already have 10 teams playing in conference championship games. Just have the "next 6" play each other on conference championship weekend and treat them like "play in" games. They are seeded 1-6 and the higher-rated team hosts OR randomly draw those matchups...whatever. This makes the conference championship games even more prestigious..."win and you're in!". That's the first weekend of games....the round of 16.

People will whine and go, "Hey, my team lost in the conference title game and is better than this or that play-in team." Well, you know what. Too bad. It's never going to be perfect. Be thankful you are even getting an opportunity as a team not playing in a conference championship game.

That means 5 of the first 8 games would have already been played during conference championship weekend anyways. It's 3 extra games.

Then you have the Super 8. You re-seed based on previous weekend results. Higher seed hosts. Conference champs get preference over any "play in" team. Conference champs get seeds 1-5. "Play-in" team get seeds 6-8. Yes, that means however the chips fall three highly-touted teams then have to go play road games. One conference champ gets the shaft (seed #5) and has to play a road game but it would be against the #4 seed. This way when "the powers that be" rank 1-5 to the Conference Champs and they give the shaft to the AAC and SunBelt champs, they are then guaranteeing one of them makes it to the Semi-Finals. This makes it more likely they actually rank the teams appropriately. You reward being a conference champ. Totally thrilling for fans as well.

Then the Semi-Finals and Final are played just like they are now. It ends up being a total of 7 extra games, and one extra weekend of games (stagger the Super 8 games so all 4 are played Saturday, or play one Friday night, then 3 on Saturday....whatever). This really isn't difficult. Just a bunch of children fighting over whether they get 15 or 20 million per game to do this.....just do it. Make some decisions (that are never going to be perfect) and make the game the best product it can be!

This 12 team format they are going to use now is a sham as well, giving teams bye-weeks. Having The Committee pick which 4 of the 6 auto-bids gets bye-weeks...it's still garbage. You can shine that turd up all you want but it's still a turd.
 
Last edited:
I would have adopted the Division II and FCS formats at 24 teams. I have always been a proponent of a 16 team format with all Division I conference champions getting an auto bid and then have 6 at large . I am sticking with my UCF roots and believe in a system that is more inclusive and ultimately leads to more parity across college football. Why shouldn't Coastal Carolina or Northern Illinois have a shot if they win their conferences?

100% agree

#UCFacts
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Strength
I like having CCG losers being out.

As my brother said during the BCS days, the point is not to "give teams a chance," but to find the #1 team. If you lose your CCG, you are axiomatically not the #1 team.

I also agree that as long as there is a committee it will be a joke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SimpleJack53
I don't think expansion hurts regular season at all. As it stands now or with 2 most teams are finished before the season starts, and 1/2 of those who remain are out after first 2 weeks. By mid season there might be 10 schools with a legit shot. For everyone else there is nothing but conf championships or bowls.
 
I would have adopted the Division II and FCS formats at 24 teams. I have always been a proponent of a 16 team format with all Division I conference champions getting an auto bid and then have 6 at large . I am sticking with my UCF roots and believe in a system that is more inclusive and ultimately leads to more parity across college football. Why shouldn't Coastal Carolina or Northern Illinois have a shot if they win their conferences?
It's almost un-American to deny the little guy a shot. Strength of Schedule is just any excuse they use as not to be upset by a G5 team. People love underdogs that win.
 
It's almost un-American to deny the little guy a shot. Strength of Schedule is just any excuse they use as not to be upset by a G5 team. People love underdogs that win.

Damn Right.

No matter how big and Dominate UCFootball gets, I pray that we remain the Champion of UCFairness.

#UCFacts
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drew-C-F
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT