Texas has a higher percentage of its state under forest cover than California or Minnesota. I read that and thought there is no way its possible, but its true.
It would be a lot more believable if you cited your sources.
There are a lot of interesting states on that list. I would have expected North Dakota to be much higher, Oregon too.
Washington would be higher if you moved there.Oregon is one of those that really took me by surprise after I moved out this way. I mean I always knew about the high desert but it's different actually driving through it and seeing it first hand. From where I'm at in Boise it's about a 5hr straight shot due west through the desert until you hit Bend and then boom... mountains and forests. You do have the Malheur, Umatilla and Wallowa-Whitman National Forests up in the NE part of the state but other than that not much. Def not something you think about driving up the lush coastline that's for sure.
Hell, even Washington is one you'd expect to be higher up the list.
Yeah right. You've been blazing that shit up since you, Johnny Hopkins, and Sloan Kettering were 16.I don't smoke weed so that leaves you being a racist!