Vote for Hillary or you're a slut that is going to Hell. Sorry ladies.
- Thread starter Bob the Citronaut
- Start date
Both of them can go screw themselves. Me voting for a female only because she's female and I'm female, is like me voting for a Caucasian because I'm Caucasian.
It's just stupid. And dumb.
I'm voting for the person, not the gender, not the color, not the nationality.
.
It's just stupid. And dumb.
I'm voting for the person, not the gender, not the color, not the nationality.
.
Good luck with that GKS . I'll continue to be a racist sexist homophobe at the polls
Did you actually see what Albright said or just read the spin on Faux? She was an old lady making a joke that didn't land.
Unless it was a """"conservative"""" they only say awful things for real real...
Example number 154,234,657 of this election cycle of why you don't need ethics or character to vote for Hillary.
I had to sit thru a commencement ceremony at FSU that she performed. She struck me as dense then and now.
But if that's a white guy of heaven forbid a conservative making a similar "joke" they'd be run out of the country.
Jimmy (((Kimmel))) had people on the street who voted in CA for the Iowa Caucus - great to see democracy in action
But I hope people understand there is a precedence for this type of lunacy.
I.e., there is a significant -- and I mean significant -- portion of the US population that believes the 48% of white people didn't vote for the President because of race, and not because they actually disagreed with the President's policies.
I'm not saying I agree, far from it. I'm just saying there is this type of 8 year-old logic going on in the media, which more and more politicians are catering to. In fact, just recently someone once again said that's why Trump is popular. Correspondingly, I agreed, but not for the reasons he thought.
I.e., there are enough people voting for Trump merely because they are so anti-DC Beltway, anti-Media arrogance that judge them as racist for not voting for the President, instead of stopping to actually listen why they disagree with the President's policies.
Even left-leaning media outlets like Salon and The Atlantic have written stories on this, trying to warn the Democratic Party that Trump's support base is not the racists and sexists they claim, but far more heavily those -- even a number of silent, traditionally Democratic Party voting -- Americans who are "lumped into" the "same pool" as them, and they are tired of it. They are literally voting for Trump because he trolls the same Beltway/Media arrogance that labeled them racists and sexists, and love the fact they actually created Trump's media persona in the first place.
So it doesn't surprise me this 8 year-old logic of the Beltway's and Media's creation it's taking every form now, even among politicians.
Last edited:
It is, but you can also pick up on sarcasm right?
Actually, that's what MSNBC also does to the right. This is our media today, although 90% of media personalities are registered to one party. In fact, that's Trump's popularity in a nutshell. I.e.,
Exactly! Even Bernie Sanders "gets it." He specifically stated that what Trump says is about the media, not Trump, and that Trump is very smart to use the media the way he is.
With the voting alliances in the media, it's getting centered on Trump, who has traditionally (and many argue underneath), is still actually a Clinton-type Democratic Progressive in his own views. Because Trump is the absolute creation of the same media, but he's pissed off Fox News too, which has only given him more support (even from some Democratic voters).
He entered the race because of a friend of the family's daughter was raped by an organized crime hitman, and his first, major, political stop was to try to educate everyone on the dangers of Organized Crime around Human Trafficking (the actual "issue" with illegal immigration) that has moved north of Phoenix, and is now operating in and out of Amnesty Cities in California, Colorado and the like. They know how to game the local law enforcement against the feds, so they can hide the most violent offenders, including those who are known sexual offenders (who have their purposes in the syndicates).
But then Trump was quoted by the left-leaning media as speaking about "all illegal immigrants," when he was specifically talking about the organized crime elements that move illegals -- the dangerous, Human Trafficking element. At that point, Trump made his decision to return the 8 year-old logic and demonizing by the media back at them 10-fold. And he's mastered it to garnering close to 40% of Americans, by many estimates, at this point. And the rest is history.
Albright is just another politician that got caught up in the same demonization/counter-demonization that dominates our media. After all, those in charge of Fox News quickly found themselves hating Trump too. That's why Trump's numbers have only picked up since he went to "war" with Fox News, especially with Chairman Roger Ailes.
It's the same left-leaning, mainstream media that took very "moderate" candidates like McCain and Romney and painted them like right-wingers. So with the "moderates" defeated twice now, even the Libertarians have been "shut out" because so many Americans are tired of being labeled over and over by the media with an 8 year-old logic. This has resulted in the creation of a man like Trump -- someone who has 0 political ties and is paying 100% for his own campaign, was destined to come along.
So where does this all leave us? I honestly don't know. Hate never works out well for anyone.
But I do remember Ross Perot being pro Marriage Equality in 1992, even predicting Clinton would sign the DOMA, all while getting labeled a "racist" for speaking out against NAFTA just a few years later. Trump remembers that too, and he's riding the wave, purposely being the guy that is easily demonized. And the silent voters love it in the polls too.
This is the Media we've let be created. It only takes the intellect of an 8 year-old to listen.
He entered the race because of a friend of the family's daughter was raped by an organized crime hitman, and his first, major, political stop was to try to educate everyone on the dangers of Organized Crime around Human Trafficking (the actual "issue" with illegal immigration) that has moved north of Phoenix, and is now operating in and out of Amnesty Cities in California, Colorado and the like. They know how to game the local law enforcement against the feds, so they can hide the most violent offenders, including those who are known sexual offenders (who have their purposes in the syndicates).
But then Trump was quoted by the left-leaning media as speaking about "all illegal immigrants," when he was specifically talking about the organized crime elements that move illegals -- the dangerous, Human Trafficking element. At that point, Trump made his decision to return the 8 year-old logic and demonizing by the media back at them 10-fold. And he's mastered it to garnering close to 40% of Americans, by many estimates, at this point. And the rest is history.
Albright is just another politician that got caught up in the same demonization/counter-demonization that dominates our media. After all, those in charge of Fox News quickly found themselves hating Trump too. That's why Trump's numbers have only picked up since he went to "war" with Fox News, especially with Chairman Roger Ailes.
It's the same left-leaning, mainstream media that took very "moderate" candidates like McCain and Romney and painted them like right-wingers. So with the "moderates" defeated twice now, even the Libertarians have been "shut out" because so many Americans are tired of being labeled over and over by the media with an 8 year-old logic. This has resulted in the creation of a man like Trump -- someone who has 0 political ties and is paying 100% for his own campaign, was destined to come along.
Remember, this is the same, heavily left-leaning, mainstream media that fails to recognize the Koch Brothers are not right-wingers, but public broadcasting supporting Libertarians. It's literally like being in grade school using 8 year-old logic. Even today I roast Democratic voters as bad as Republican voters, especially when Democrats give me anti-Republican arguments that do not apply to Libertarians and vice-versa. A lot of Americans aren't dumb, and they are tired of the left and right arguing about useless positions that don't help anyone, sans special interest. But logic pales in comparison to the staunch, anti-DC Beltway, anti-Media hate that exists, which the Beltway and Media created.
So where does this all leave us? I honestly don't know. Hate never works out well for anyone.
But I do remember Ross Perot being pro Marriage Equality in 1992, even predicting Clinton would sign the DOMA, all while getting labeled a "racist" for speaking out against NAFTA just a few years later. Trump remembers that too, and he's riding the wave, purposely being the guy that is easily demonized. And the silent voters love it in the polls too.
This is the Media we've let be created. It only takes the intellect of an 8 year-old to listen.
Last edited:
Hillary is really going to lose to a demented senile socialist left wing zealot during a year in which every single credible candidate in the Democratic Party fell on their sword to assure they did not interfere with her Grand Coronation.
lolllllllllllllll
lolllllllllllllll
As much as I don't like Bernie Sanders' base policies, he's one of the most honest politicians with one of the best, consistent voting records since Ron Paul. Sanders even refused to back down to the Liberty-destroying, Populous "Democratic-Progressive" wing when he fully justified why he supported the indemnification of gun manufacturers and resellers.
As anyone remembers from the time ...
The "Progressive" thinktanks had figured out if you send an army of lawyers at the small-time gun manufacturers and resellers that "scrape by" with private sales -- you'd destroy the entire industry. That would leave only the large, profitable gun corporations who make nearly all of their money from large state and federal contracts, who only get a fraction from private sales, with very, very few exceptions (e.g., Remington 700 is one of the few lines with solid, private sales).
I.e., destroy the "grass roots" foundation of private gun ownership in a matter of years by obliterating the small business, innovative private market, and the big corporations who wouldn't want to lose their state and federal contracts would "fall in line."
Bernie joined Paul, and the few Liberty-loving Democratic Congressmen and women, with the Republicans to pass that bill and end that load of BS. Despite what the media says, gun manufacturers very much can be held liable for many things ... but just not the load of BS those lawyers were starting to pull. Their entire strategy was to obliterate the small manufacturing and reseller marketing, the primary, and innovative, end of private gun sales.
Smith&Wesson is #1 and every knows they don't say jack. Colt is also up there. Remmington teeters at times, because they have a large enough, private rifle consumer base, but other than that, there's really no one. Heck, Magpul and other, innovative manufactures are the ones really innovating. Civilian accessories for AR15 and other platforms that the military then tries out, and adopts.
The "Progressive" thinktanks had figured out if you send an army of lawyers at the small-time gun manufacturers and resellers that "scrape by" with private sales -- you'd destroy the entire industry. That would leave only the large, profitable gun corporations who make nearly all of their money from large state and federal contracts, who only get a fraction from private sales, with very, very few exceptions (e.g., Remington 700 is one of the few lines with solid, private sales).
I.e., destroy the "grass roots" foundation of private gun ownership in a matter of years by obliterating the small business, innovative private market, and the big corporations who wouldn't want to lose their state and federal contracts would "fall in line."
Bernie joined Paul, and the few Liberty-loving Democratic Congressmen and women, with the Republicans to pass that bill and end that load of BS. Despite what the media says, gun manufacturers very much can be held liable for many things ... but just not the load of BS those lawyers were starting to pull. Their entire strategy was to obliterate the small manufacturing and reseller marketing, the primary, and innovative, end of private gun sales.
Smith&Wesson is #1 and every knows they don't say jack. Colt is also up there. Remmington teeters at times, because they have a large enough, private rifle consumer base, but other than that, there's really no one. Heck, Magpul and other, innovative manufactures are the ones really innovating. Civilian accessories for AR15 and other platforms that the military then tries out, and adopts.
The US media is just so engineering and physics illiterate, but Bernie Sanders is not, and he sides with small businesses. I don't like his overall policies, but I will always give him credit for sticking up for small businesses ... even against the Democratic party at times, along with Paul against the Republicans.
ack.....I meant the ancestry.....like voting for or against someone because they're Cuban or Canadian.
.
But that's not the the issue anymore.
It's not whether you voted for, against or were neutral because of someone's ancestry.
It's now about what the DC Beltway and the Media says you did or thought
... not what you actually did or thought.
I used to think that was just being facetious, since I don't watch much news at all, and haven't since the early '90s. But the polls don't lie. Even the focus groups -- paid for by both the Democratic and Republican Parties -- don't lie. And even some left-leaning media outlets are trying to warn the rest of the mainstream media what they are doing.
As Sanders even admits ... Trump is smart, very smart. There is a huge segment of the US population, not just those who never voted for the President, but especially those who did ... that are tired of being thrown in with racists merely because they now disagree with the President over his policies.
There is a very, very, very significant portion of the US population that now feels this way, and we're going to find out just how much soon enough.
I.e., most people voting for Trump are not voting for the man. They are literally voting for what he does to the media, toying with them. Heck, even most people in the UK believe the US is anti-Muslim now and that's why the "family" headed to Disneyland was denied entry! The only place in the UK you can find the full story and all the details is a couple of good UK travel advisory sites that go into all of the problems and how to avoid them.
As Sanders even admits ... Trump is smart, very smart. There is a huge segment of the US population, not just those who never voted for the President, but especially those who did ... that are tired of being thrown in with racists merely because they now disagree with the President over his policies.
There is a very, very, very significant portion of the US population that now feels this way, and we're going to find out just how much soon enough.
I.e., most people voting for Trump are not voting for the man. They are literally voting for what he does to the media, toying with them. Heck, even most people in the UK believe the US is anti-Muslim now and that's why the "family" headed to Disneyland was denied entry! The only place in the UK you can find the full story and all the details is a couple of good UK travel advisory sites that go into all of the problems and how to avoid them.
