HH really hates Frost..
This is a 2-3 win team w GOL on the sideline without the future of talented Freshman like Snelson, Hamilton, & Killins bc they never commit here
HH really hates Frost..
This is a 2-3 win team w GOL on the sideline without the future of talented Freshman like Snelson, Hamilton, & Killins bc they never commit here
HH really hates Frost..
This is a 2-3 win team w GOL on the sideline without the future of talented Freshman like Snelson, Hamilton, & Killins bc they never commit here
they might not have been on the team either, the last staff sucked their joy of the Sport out of themAgreed. The Griffins would not have the year they're having either. To the haters, let me guess the Griffins now suck right? Now i know what K_L meant when he said Shaquem should be happy to play much less wonder if he will win or lose a game.
I very much agree. This was not an Oregon offense. Also, GOL would have had Taafe call plays to throw downfield more.I love Frost, but when GOL was actually engaged in coaching his defense was stout. I think his D would have been similar. The offense this season was not that much off from a GOL offense. I believe this to be Frost having to generate a game plan with players not meant to be in the fast pace offense. We did not see the Oregon offense this year. We saw some strange hybrid
Given our limitations I think the OP is right on. These guys have exceeded expectations, even Milton.
You can't really compare yesterday to 64-12. That Bulls team had a ferocious D-line and our QBs were worse than Milton. Also the crowd and atmosphere at Bulls games in 2007 gave them huge home field advantages that year.they might not have been on the team either, the last staff sucked their joy of the Sport out of them
also this Defense most likely would not have been as opportunistic forcing as as many turnovers in a 4-3 scheme w less blitz packages which would have been run under the last staff
And you can't underestimate how much these players LOVE playing for Frost and Chinander. The motivation to keep fighting all year and play for him & his vision. That team was outmatched yesterday but kept fighting to have it be a 7 point game up till mid 4th quarter, under GOL that turns into a 64-12 type game real quick
I don't hate Frost. I just really dislike his offense and play calling. As a recruiter and motivator he's great. I think getting new uniforms and the youthful energy has done a lot for this team.HH really hates Frost..
This is a 2-3 win team w GOL on the sideline without the future of talented Freshman like Snelson, Hamilton, & Killins bc they never commit here
4 wins max. We could have beaten SCThe defense carried the team to 6 wins this year. The defense alone had out scored opponents 30-29 in the 3 games prior to USF and if UCF doesn't give up 24 points of 2 picks, a fumble, and a turnover on downs (21 of which are directly related to the offense) then we probably win yesterday as well.
Be happy with what we have after last year's crapstrom. NONE of you were expecting as much.
I liked how the announcing crew emphasized the real (and only?) benefit of a bowl: 15 extra practices to train and develop your future 1st and 2nd string players (plus an extra game of experience). That's one big reason the same teams stay ranked every year.No joke, from here on out, UCF should expect to go bowling every year. I'd like to see a nice 15 year streak start this season. There's no reason why that shouldn't be expected by each and everyone of us.
Frost is looking at the future and big picture. Many fans are not. There's no evidence that Holman would have won any of those games. Actually, we might have lost to UConn.The only real gripe I have with Frost was his stuborness to not go back to Holman when Milton was clearly struggling to move the ball consistently the past 3 or 4 games. When Holman did come in for a few series he successfully scored touchdowns. We might have been able to win 1 or 2 more games......
I liked how the announcing crew emphasized the real (and only?) benefit of a bowl: 15 extra practices to train and develop your future 1st and 2nd string players (plus an extra game of experience). That's one big reason the same teams stay ranked every year.
But 30 of the bowls lose big money each year ($1.5 to 3 million). That's why a nearby bowls saves our low-budget program a lot, while it also lets lots more fans attend.
Not so with minor bowls. Remember that 95% of all bowl payouts go to the tiny fraction of top bowls!AAC shares bowl revenue/expenses with its members, just like most conferences...and bowls today are TV paid TV shows for ESPN as advertisers like that specific audience during the holidays...so it really doesn't matter much if bowls sell a lot of tickets or not.
Obviously, with 3 and potentially 4 AAC Bowl Games in FLA...odds are usf and UCF would be able to bus to/from those locations....and most years they would never go to other AAC bowl games in Annapolis or Ft Worth, TX.
This is a 2-3 win team w GOL on the sideline without the future of talented Freshman like Snelson, Hamilton, & Killins bc they never commit here
GOL did not have the personality to coach these UCF kids well, and turn the season around. This is a fact.You must really like GOL. I did, but there's no way we win 2-3 games with last year's game plan.
This is one of two directions Frost could have chosen. Frost chose to keep Milton in and to keep giving Milton the experience "possibly at the expense of win with Holman".Frost is looking at the future and big picture. Many fans are not. There's no evidence that Holman would have won any of those games. Actually, we might have lost to UConn.
What would have happened if Holman came in?
1) Milton's growth and experience gets stunted. Lack of valuable PT.
2) Milton feels that he has to look over his shoulder and loses confidence