I guess my initial thought on Great Man is that it's perfect in theory but junk in reality. Since this thread is about black people I'll just focus on that segment:Wasn't familiar with it so had to look it up. Interesting stuff. Thoughts on the theory? Proponent?
I have no take on the theory but just want to clarify that I didn't know what it was.
James then argues that these spontaneous variations of genius, i.e. the great men, which are causally independent of their social environment, subsequently influence that environment which in turn will either preserve or destroy the newly encountered variations in a form of evolutionary selection. If the great man is preserved then the environment is changed by his influence in "an entirely original and peculiar way. He acts as a ferment, and changes its constitution, just as the advent of a new zoological species changes the faunal and floral equilibrium of the region in which it appears." Each ferment, each great man, exerts a new influence on their environment which is either embraced or rejected and if embraced will in turn shape the crucible for the selection process of future geniuses.
I wasn't meaning to imply that the example necessarily needed to be "great" (i.e. President) although that can obviously have a positive impact too. Just that the example should be seen and within reach for one to reason by analogy.
I'm all for that great person coming forth and jumpstarting this shit though. Do you think they're out there?
We have tons of black role models that have reached the pinnacle for black communities to emulate. Obama, Michelle, Oprah, Michael Jordan, Ben Carson, MLK, Herman Cain, Denzel Washington, tyra banks, etc.......all have reached the pinnacle of success in their respective endeavors in spite of a system that supposedly is designed to restrict that from happening. Dozens and dozens of examples of black people succeeding and should be the role models that we supposedly need. In the 1990s, some of the highest rated TV shows were based around black families and none of that seemed like a forced narrative.
So I guess I don't totally understand why or how we went from Michael Jordan and Tiger Woods, to George Floyd being the "great man" that drives public movement.