ADVERTISEMENT

Where all my dumb rednecks, racist goons, and frat boys at?

The same snowflakes blaming him for HRCs loss will now be crying about his firing. Just look. It's hilarious.
Dude even a trump homer like u can see the timing of this is strange to say the least. He fired comey because of how he handled Clinton investigation in 2016? But didn't do it until well into his own investigation?

Yes "snowflakes" were pissed at comey back but then but the same trump homers that are cool with him being fired today we're loving comey in 2016. Trump included!
 
Dude even a trump homer like u can see the timing of this is strange to say the least. He fired comey because of how he handled Clinton investigation in 2016? But didn't do it until well into his own investigation?

Yes "snowflakes" were pissed at comey back but then but the same trump homers that are cool with him being fired today we're loving comey in 2016. Trump included!

The guy just admitted to misleading statements he gave to Congress.

The guy has been a mess on all accounts.

Surely HRC snowflakes thank Trump for carrying out Justice on their behalf?
 
Dude even a trump homer like u can see the timing of this is strange to say the least. He fired comey because of how he handled Clinton investigation in 2016? But didn't do it until well into his own investigation?

Yes "snowflakes" were pissed at comey back but then but the same trump homers that are cool with him being fired today we're loving comey in 2016. Trump included!

Comey's new boss was just confirmed a couple weeks ago. He did his due diligence and made the call. He had over 90 votes from the Senate and worked under W and Obama. Sure sounds like a cover up to me. It's hilarious listening to Dems talking about cover ups and suppressing the FBI after what happened between the Clinton's and Lynch that put Comey and FBI in the position they did in the first place.
 
So no rebuttal to the facts? Just more fact less conspiracy theories?
What's the point? The facts are so distorted by trump supporters really no point trying to argue them when they can't even be established to begin with.

Trump fired the lead independent investigator into his own criminal investigation for the exact things trump praised comey for during his candidacy. What's so hard to understand about that?
 
Lol ok guys sure thing

Rosenstein, US Deputy Attorney General (Comey's boss) was just confirmed on April 25th and was widely supported by both Democrats and Republicans by a vote of 94-6.

Rosenstein, after review, didn't have confidence in Comey for a variety of reasons so he left Trump no choice but to fire him.
 
Rosenstein, US Deputy Attorney General (Comey's boss) was just confirmed on April 25th and was widely supported by both Democrats and Republicans by a vote of 94-6.

Rosenstein, after review, didn't have confidence in Comey for a variety of reasons so he left Trump no choice but to fire him.
So when new FBI director is appointed I presume the investigation into trump Russia ties will also convienently be shut down too? And then we'll see you and bob in here defending that too
 
Funny thing is rosenstein sent trump the memo TODAY and comey was fired immediately.

Yates told trump that Flynn was compromised and lying to VP Pence and trump waited 18 days to fire him allowing Flynn to continue all regular NSA duties including sitting in on major calls and appointments on foreign policy. Trump only fired Flynn after the Washington post news broke too! If not Flynn would still be in there.

Remember Yates was not partisan and worked for both dems and repubs.
 
Even republican senators are questioning the timing of this. But the trump homers in here think it's just another home run
 
Yates is partisan. She publically refused to do her job because she disagreed with a legal EO.

The FBI isn't the only agency investigating. There are more than a dozen intel agencies. The FBI, DNI, CIA and NSA released a joint report on the Russian investigation. Firing one guy won't make the investigation go away in the FBI and it sure as hell won't make them go away in Congress or the other agencies. You're all insane conspiracy theorists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFKnightfan08
So when new FBI director is appointed I presume the investigation into trump Russia ties will also convienently be shut down too? And then we'll see you and bob in here defending that too

Actually, wouldn't be surprised if an Independent Council Investigation, plus re-open the Clinton alleged charges as well.
 
Yates is partisan. She publically refused to do her job because she disagreed with a legal EO.

The FBI isn't the only agency investigating. There are more than a dozen intel agencies. The FBI, DNI, CIA and NSA released a joint report on the Russian investigation. Firing one guy won't make the investigation go away in the FBI and it sure as hell won't make them go away in Congress or the other agencies. You're all insane conspiracy theorists.
Yates is a 30yr doj employee who was appointed by a republican lmao. She's not partisan. She owned ted Cruz yesterday when he tried to claim the same thing as you, google the video. The EO violated the constitution plain and simple and replublicans especially should be praising her for putting her job on the line to defend the constitution.

Trump surrogates are on tv right now asking for everyone to "move on from Russia Investiation" but yah there's nothing there
 
  • Like
Reactions: MACHater02
Funny thing is rosenstein sent trump the memo TODAY and comey was fired immediately.

Yates told trump that Flynn was compromised and lying to VP Pence and trump waited 18 days to fire him allowing Flynn to continue all regular NSA duties including sitting in on major calls and appointments on foreign policy. Trump only fired Flynn after the Washington post news broke too! If not Flynn would still be in there.

Remember Yates was not partisan and worked for both dems and repubs.

Yet Obama didn't take away Flynn's security clearance plus allowed him to travel to Russia last year for the paid gig.

Yeah, Yates and Obama were REAL concerned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: btbones
Yet Obama didn't take away Flynn's security clearance plus allowed him to travel to Russia last year for the paid gig.

Yeah, Yates and Obama were REAL concerned.
it's irrelevant to the matter. Trump knew Flynn was compromised and waited 18 days to fire him, only after wapo article came out

Stop bringing up the past to defend current admin goof ups.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NinjaKnight
Yates is a 30yr doj employee who was appointed by a republican lmao. She's not partisan. She owned ted Cruz yesterday when he tried to claim the same thing as you, google the video. The EO violated the constitution plain and simple and replublicans especially should be praising her for putting her job on the line to defend the constitution.

Trump surrogates are on tv right now asking for everyone to "move on from Russia Investiation" but yah there's nothing there

Explain how it's against the Constitution.

Where is the evidence in the Russia investigation? It's been going on for nearly a year. If there was anything there it would have been leaked under Obama and certainly during the first couple months when Obama appointments were still in their jobs.

Yates is 100% a partisan. She'll be on a Dem ticket within four years.
 
Explain how it's against the Constitution.

Where is the evidence in the Russia investigation? It's been going on for nearly a year. If there was anything there it would have been leaked under Obama and certainly during the first couple months when Obama appointments were still in their jobs.

Yates is 100% a partisan. She'll be on a Dem ticket within four years.
Google the video. Yates explains it very well to Cruz. theres tons of information on it too. Gotta stop watching Fox News to see it though

Where is evidence on Russia? Are u blind? Multiple trump admin fired over connections to Russia, proof Russia meddled in our elections. Public is trying to find more but people investigating trump keep conveniently getting fired.

Sally Yates being partisan despite being a republican appointee and working for republicans and dems over 30yrs sounds like the biggest conspiracy theory in this thread.
 
Again. Many GOP politicians coming out calling the timing of this firing suspicious. But yah just a dem conspiracy theory.
 
Again. Many GOP politicians coming out calling the timing of this firing suspicious. But yah just a dem conspiracy theory.

Why are you so butthurt? They are giving your beloved HRC the Justice she deserves no?

Comey cost her the election!!!
 
I've wanted him out since the whole "yeah she broke the law and risked national security etc. etc. but no we shouldn't prosecute."

As for the Russia investigation, if there is something there (there's not) it will continue to be investigated. Haven't seen a shred of evidence though. I like the "Obama warned Trump about Flynn" nonsense though since O gave him clearance and didn't take it away. Say what you want about Trump not firing him right away, at least he did it.
 
Last edited:
And btw, Comey has said 3 times under oath that there is no evidence of Trump working with Russia. Why would he fire him for leading the investigation?
 
I've wanted him out since the whole "yeah she broke the law and risked national security etc. etc. but no we shouldn't prosecute."

As for the Russia investigation, if there is something there (there's not) it will continue to be investigated. Haven't seen a shred of evidence though. I like the "Obama earned Trump about Flynn" nonsense though since O gave him clearance and didn't take it away. Say what you want about Trump not firing him right away, at least he did it.
Not only did Obama fire him, but he told Trump not to hire him. Nice try.
 
I've wanted him out since the whole "yeah she broke the law and risked national security etc. etc. but no we shouldn't prosecute."

As for the Russia investigation, if there is something there (there's not) it will continue to be investigated. Haven't seen a shred of evidence though. I like the "Obama earned Trump about Flynn" nonsense though since O gave him clearance and didn't take it away. Say what you want about Trump not firing him right away, at least he did it.
At least he did it? Lol only after the Washington post made it public that Flynn was compromised. IF that story doesn't come out Flynn is still director of NSA.
 
And btw, Comey has said 3 times under oath that there is no evidence of Trump working with Russia. Why would he fire him for leading the investigation?
No he didn't. not even once. He actually has said there was zero evidence of Obama wiretapping trump, though.
 
Outstanding!

When Comey failed to prosecute Hillary after announcing all her violations of national security law, it was obvious to everyone, he was being blackmailed to let Hillary go.

EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY - So he didn't even get a chance to load up his cardboard box of bric a brac as they escorted him to the elevator after first confiscating his little gold badge and Glock 23.

There on the wall sits his autographed picture of Hillary, unwanted and headed for the dumpster.
It's great how Trump specifically mentions how on three occasions, Comey told him he wasn't under FBI investigation. There is no reason to say this except as a signal to the media which counters their ridiculous Russian theory. This is best news since pre-Syria days.
Now that's the Trump I voted for.
 
Outstanding!

When Comey failed to prosecute Hillary after announcing all her violations of national security law, it was obvious to everyone, he was being blackmailed to let Hillary go.

EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY - So he didn't even get a chance to load up his cardboard box of bric a brac as they escorted him to the elevator after first confiscating his little gold badge and Glock 23.

There on the wall sits his autographed picture of Hillary, unwanted and headed for the dumpster.
It's great how Trump specifically mentions how on three occasions, Comey told him he wasn't under FBI investigation. There is no reason to say this except as a signal to the media which counters their ridiculous Russian theory. This is best news since pre-Syria days.
Now that's the Trump I voted for.
There's no reason to say it at all unless you are a nutjob lol. I legit thought it was a photoshop when I first saw it

Btw comey said Monday trump campaign was under investigation
 
Lots of irony here:

Most dems, who blame Comey for Donald's win, are pissed.

Some Republicans are pretty troubled by this firing. Others, like boob the nuthugger and KL, keep fondling them ballz.

Trump: "Comey handled HRC's investigation with integrity and did the right thing. We all owe him a debt of bigly gratitude. No one could have stood on the face of such a yuuuuge thing and done what he did."

Trump: lulz, you handled that shit bigly bad, you're fired.
 
Just waiting on BT and SirG...

The rest of you haven't disappointed. Great stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MACHater02
Yates is a 30yr doj employee who was appointed by a republican lmao. She's not partisan. She owned ted Cruz yesterday when he tried to claim the same thing as you, google the video. The EO violated the constitution plain and simple and replublicans especially should be praising her for putting her job on the line to defend the constitution.

Trump surrogates are on tv right now asking for everyone to "move on from Russia Investiation" but yah there's nothing there
It's not her job to determine constitutionality. She failed to follow an EO, that is legal until determined unconstitutional, and was fired because of it. I have no issue there.

On the general topic of Comey, it's bad timing. Comey did need to go for politicizing his position when he's an independent investigator. It's not his job to recommend charges but he did so in the Clinton investigation. But because there's an investigation related to Trump, it just doesn't look good and appears to make this position even more politicized.
 
It's not her job to determine constitutionality. She failed to follow an EO, that is legal until determined unconstitutional, and was fired because of it. I have no issue there.

On the general topic of Comey, it's bad timing. Comey did need to go for politicizing his position when he's an independent investigator. It's not his job to recommend charges but he did so in the Clinton investigation. But because there's an investigation related to Trump, it just doesn't look good and appears to make this position even more politicized.
Weird cuz when she was confirmed by a republican house they asked her if she would stand up to a pres (at the time Obama) if he tried to pass an unconstitutional EO. She said she would and repubs rejoiced. Now that she actually did it faux outrage is abound
 
  • Like
Reactions: MACHater02
And btw, Comey has said 3 times under oath that there is no evidence of Trump working with Russia. Why would he fire him for leading the investigation?

You are making the mistake of assuming Trump is telling the truth when he said that. Just like the wires tapped, just like it not raining at the innaguration, just like hundreds of other things Trump has said that are flat out wrong.

But some of y'all are such blind trumpets that if he said the sky is orange you would be on here minutes later telling us we are fake news for saying anything otherwise. It is literally frightening.
 
Here's how it could play out and if it does we should be worried. Trump gets to appoint a new FBI director. New director comes in and immediately shuts down FBI investigation into trump. No independent investigation is completed and we never truly know how connected to Russia trump is.

Trump Russia isn't a libtard conspiracy. It has legs and trumps worried about it as evidenced by including it in his letter to fire comey.
 
Lol. Even if your conspiracy theory is true how does a new director at the FBI stop investigations in the House, the Senate and the dozen other Intel agencies? You still haven't shown any proof of this Russian collusion narrative. There is nothing there. If there is it would have been leaked.
 
Weird cuz when she was confirmed by a republican house they asked her if she would stand up to a pres (at the time Obama) if he tried to pass an unconstitutional EO. She said she would and repubs rejoiced. Now that she actually did it faux outrage is abound
It's idiotic to praise white-knighting when her Roles and Responsibilities do not include such determinations. Pointing to Republican actions as a defense doesn't work, they're as hypocritical as they come (as are democrats). If someone, who's job is to implement the direction of the President, has the leeway to determine constitutionality then what's the purpose of the Judiciary. She overstepped and was fired, everything else is political posturing.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT