ADVERTISEMENT

Why Are Conservatives More Susceptible to Believing Lies?

NinjaKnight

Todd's Tiki Bar
Feb 18, 2007
25,395
4,696
113
Not a huge fan of slate, but they are attempting to answer the question I've recently been wondering. Where is the liberal version of Alex Jones? Evidently there isn't a market, unlike for the conservatives. The facts below really are telling.



Why Are Conservatives More Susceptible to Believing Lies?
An interplay between how all humans think and how conservatives tend to act might actually explain a lot about our current moment.
By John Ehrenreich
Many conservatives have a loose relationship with facts. The right-wing denial of what most people think of as accepted reality starts with political issues: As recently as 2016, 45 percent of Republicans still believed that the Affordable Care Act included “death panels” (it doesn’t). A 2015 poll found that 54 percent of GOP primary voters believed then-President Obama to be a Muslim (…he isn’t).



then there are the false beliefs about generally accepted science. Only 25 percent of self-proclaimed Trump voters agree that climate change is caused by human activities. Only 43 percent of Republicans overall believe that humans have evolved over time.

Advertisement

And then it gets really crazy. Almost 1 in 6 Trump voters, while simultaneously viewing photographs of the crowds at the 2016 inauguration of Donald Trump and at the 2012 inauguration of Barack Obama , insisted that the former were larger. Sixty-six percent of self-described “very conservative” Americans seriously believe that “Muslims are covertly implementing Sharia law in American courts.” Forty-six percent of Trump voters polled just after the 2016 election either thought that Hillary Clinton was connected to a child sex trafficking ring run out of the basement of a pizzeria in Washington, D.C., or weren’t sure if it was true.

If “truth” is judged on the basis of Enlightenment ideas of reason and more or less objective “evidence,” many of the substantive positions common on the right seem to border on delusional. The left is certainly not immune to credulity (most commonly about the safety of vaccines, GMO foods, and fracking), but the right seems to specialize in it. “Misinformation is currently predominantly a pathology of the right,” concluded a team of scholarsfrom the Harvard Kennedy School and Northeastern University at a February 2017 conference. A BuzzFeed analysisfound that three main hyperconservative Facebook pages were roughly twice as likely as three leading ultraliberal Facebook pages to publish fake or misleading information.

Why are conservatives so susceptible to misinformation? The right wing’s disregard for facts and reasoning is not a matter of stupidity or lack of education. College-educated Republicans are actually more likely than less-educated Republicans to have believed that Barack Obama was a Muslim and that “death panels” were part of the ACA. And for political conservatives, but not for liberals, greater knowledge of science and math is associated with a greater likelihood of dismissing what almost all scientists believe about the human causation of global warming.



http://www.slate.com/articles/healt...re_more_susceptible_to_believing_in_lies.html
 
I don't think I would say that conservatives are more apt to believe lies than liberals, its just the context of those lies that delineates them.

Conservatives are probably more likely to be paranoid and resistent to change. Liberals are more likely to believe revisionist history or find ways to justify things in spite of imperical evidence if it appears to be on the side of progress. At any rate, it all just comes down to confirmation bias. Liberals believed that Reagan was dangerous because they wanted to. They were also quick to believe the conspiracy theories about GWB being behind 9/11. It goes both ways and the age of information has just exacerbated it on both sides.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
I don't think I would say that conservatives are more apt to believe lies than liberals, its just the context of those lies that delineates them.

Conservatives are probably more likely to be paranoid and resistent to change. Liberals are more likely to believe revisionist history or find ways to justify things in spite of imperical evidence if it appears to be on the side of progress. At any rate, it all just comes down to confirmation bias. Liberals believed that Reagan was dangerous because they wanted to. They were also quick to believe the conspiracy theories about GWB being behind 9/11. It goes both ways and the age of information has just exacerbated it on both sides.

No liberal thinks that.
 
When has the whole 9/11 truther thing been a liberal idea? I've literally never heard that, I've only seen Alex Jones and his ilk spreading that conspiracy theory.
 
When has the whole 9/11 truther thing been a liberal idea? I've literally never heard that, I've only seen Alex Jones and his ilk spreading that conspiracy theory.
I know Cindy Sheehan for one was a Democrat 9/11 truther in addition to her anti war activism during the Dubya days.
 
@The Branch not that facts and logic will change your mind, but I do enjoy making you look stupid.

You take an article from The Salon .... and then talk about "facts and logic" as a way make me look stupid?

LOL.... dude ... I don't even know where to start. I will guarantee you that a conservative could ask liberals questions about Trump ... and find out they totally believe 99% of the lies that have been made about him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
When has the whole 9/11 truther thing been a liberal idea? I've literally never heard that, I've only seen Alex Jones and his ilk spreading that conspiracy theory.

Pretty sure crazyhole just ruined your "facts and truth"...

"More than half of Democrats, according to a neutral survey, said they believed Bush was complicit in the 9/11 terror attacks."
 
You take an article from The Salon .... and then talk about "facts and logic" as a way make me look stupid?

LOL.... dude ... I don't even know where to start. I will guarantee you that a conservative could ask liberals questions about Trump ... and find out they totally believe 99% of the lies that have been made about him.

I rest my case. You literally just did exactly what the article was talking about. Thanks for proving my point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MACHater02
You take an article from The Salon .... and then talk about "facts and logic" as a way make me look stupid?

LOL.... dude ... I don't even know where to start. I will guarantee you that a conservative could ask liberals questions about Trump ... and find out they totally believe 99% of the lies that have been made about him.
You see all those links in his post. You can click those if you don't like the analysis and look through the data for yourself. But to just dismiss polling as fake because you don't like the way it makes you feel is insane. Could it be taken out of context? Sure. Could there be an explanation? Sure. You're basically one of the people described in the article. A low IQ mouth breathing red hat awaiting your orders from a Facebook meme made in Russia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NinjaKnight
You see all those links in his post. You can click those if you don't like the analysis and look through the data for yourself. But to just dismiss polling as fake because you don't like the way it makes you feel is insane. Could it be taken out of context? Sure. Could their be an explanation? Sure. You're basically one of the people described in the article. A low IQ mouth breathing red hat awaiting your orders from a Facebook meme made in Russia.

I don't wear a red hat .... the other stuff is probably true.
 
So @Crazyhole , where's the liberal version of alex jones? Millions of viewers yet completely insanely red hat retarded? I'm sure you will google some bullshit opinion piece and paste the link without doing any real research and act like you aren't full of shit.
 
If you google "left wing conspiracy theories", it redirects you to "right wing conspiracy theories".

Just thought that was interesting
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
If you google "left wing conspiracy theories", it redirects you to "right wing conspiracy theories".

Just thought that was interesting

Huh, almost as if there aren't nearly as many left wing conspiracy theories, due to lack of demand. Crazy thought.
 
"Obama is a muslim". When pictures of Obama wearing muslim garb are circulated and his father was born Muslim it isnt out of the realm of rationale to question where his faith lies. I personally dont think he has a very strong faith life in general, but its understandable why people would question it.


"The ACA includes death panels". I dont recall anyone claiming that death panels were written into the law but wouldnt be surprised at all if they did. I do recall people saying that single payer healthcare would lead to death panels, which again is a reasonable question to ask.

These don't equate to Alex Jones saying we are turning the frogs gay or that chemtrails are making us sterile. The equivalent on the left would be the claims that Monsanto is poisoning us with roundup. The difference is that I dont know a single person who believes we are turning the frogs gay but I know a lot of people who think roundup is poisoning us.
 
Glyphosate, which is banned in many countries, being harmful is a conspiracy theory in the current year.
 
Glyphosate, which is banned in many countries, being harmful is a conspiracy theory in the current year.

And is one of the dumbest CTs yet. Most pesticide/insecticide/ broad spectrum weedkillers are FAR more residual than Roundup. The stuff isnt DDT, or even dicamba or 2-4D.
 
You do realize that half of the time you are just about as respected among the conservative community as Alex Jones is, right?

Libs always need a boogey man .... "Right wing talk radio" ... "big oil" .... "kids in cages" .... "alt-right" ... occupy wall street ... BLM ....

They always need a "crusade" to try to win political points.
 
ninjas number one response to anything about him. call someone stupid/idiot/moron/bread dead/red hat/etc
 
How is this remotely close to the same thing as 43% of republicans not believing in evolution?
This would never happen, but I would love to see the Republicans that they polled via cold calls out of the 2000 people who answered their phones and finished the survey call. I have a large number of Republican friends and I don’t think any of them reject that human beings have evolved since the beginning of time. I have known a few religious people that were recent creationists, but by far the majority accepted the theory of evolution. I’m guessing that most of us can count on one hand the number of people who refuse that evolution exists.
 
This would never happen, but I would love to see the Republicans that they polled via cold calls out of the 2000 people who answered their phones and finished the survey call. I have a large number of Republican friends and I don’t think any of them reject that human beings have evolved since the beginning of time. I have known a few religious people that were recent creationists, but by far the majority accepted the theory of evolution. I’m guessing that most of us can count on one hand the number of people who refuse that evolution exists.

I certainly hope you are correct, but sadly I don't share the same optimism on the general intelligence of the human race, especially after interacting on this board.
 
I wish I could pinpoint the exact date that Slate went from being a thoughtful interesting magazine to the Breitbart of the left. It used to be a well rounded, though more liberal, publication. Now it's just thoughtless garbage for liberals that don't want to interact with diverse opinions.
 
I wish I could pinpoint the exact date that Slate went from being a thoughtful interesting magazine to the Breitbart of the left. It used to be a well rounded, though more liberal, publication. Now it's just thoughtless garbage for liberals that don't want to interact with diverse opinions.
It’s like that on all sides now unfortunately .
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1ofTheseKnights
How is this remotely close to the same thing as 43% of republicans not believing in evolution?


Well, one is immesurable and the other can be observed. I guess that means that republicans are less likely to believe something that cannot be proven than Democrats.
 
ninjas number one response to anything about him. call someone stupid/idiot/moron/bread dead/red hat/etc


Its like he has a string on his back that you pull and out comes like one of four things. Seriously, the guy rarely offers anything of substance -- other than that one time he was very thoughtfully and eloquently discussing the Iran deal....EXCEPT HE FREAKING PLAGIARIZED THAT SHIT and tried to pass it off as his own!! Honestly, without google that dude would universally be thought of as a bumbling tool-shed and complete fukc-knuckle. Now, I must give him credit for coming in here day after day only to get his ass handed to him without fail. Yet he keeps coming back. Pathetic actually. However I must admit that I am always humored to watch him dash into a thread in a hapless attempt to defend Fried Chicken only to seemingly start sucking on his dick like he's trying to remove some venom. Truly, truly embarrassing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT