ADVERTISEMENT

Why are people so hostile towards President Donald Trump?

firm_bizzle

Todd's Tiki Bar
Gold Member
Jul 24, 2008
42,149
42,900
113
This Marine might have pTDS.

https://www.quora.com/Why-are-peopl...President-Donald-Trump/answer/Chris-OLeary-19

I’ll take a stab at this. Before you pass my answer off as “Another Liberal Snowflake” consider that 1.) I'm an independent centrist who has voted Republican way more often in my life than Democrat, and 2.) if you want to call someone who spent the entire decade of his 20’s serving in the Marine Corps a snowflake, I’d be ready to answer the question what did you do with your 20’s?

Why Liberals (And not-so liberals) are against President Trump.

A.) He lies. A LOT. Politifact rates 70% of the words he speaks as “Mostly False or worse” Only 14% of the things he says get a “Mostly True” or better rating. That is an absolutely unbelievable number. How he doesn’t speak more truth by mistake is beyond me. To put it in context, Obama’s rating was 26% mostly false or worse, and I had a problem with that. Many of Trump’s former business associates report that he has always been a compulsive liar, but now he’s the President of the United States, and that’s a problem. And this is a man who expects you to believe him when he points at other people and says “They’re lying.”

main-qimg-2344a43f8593a64eff36f2b5f1fac9b8

B.) He’s an authoritarian populist, not a conservative. He advances regressive social policy while proposing to expand federal spending and federalist authority over states, both of which conservatives are supposed to hate.

C.) He pretends at Christianity to court the Religious Right but fails to live anything resembling a Christ-Like Life.

D.) His nationalist “America First” message effectively alienates us and removes us from our place as leaders in the international community.

E.) His ideas on “Keeping us safe” are all thinly veiled ideas to remove our freedoms, he is, after all, an authoritarian first. They also are simply bad ideas.

F.) He couldn’t pass a 3rd-grade civics exam. He doesn't’ know what he’s doing. He doesn't understand how international relations work, he doesn’t understand how federal state or local governments work, and every time someone tries to “Run it like a business” it’s a spectacular failure. See Colorado Springs’ recent history as an example. The Short, Unhappy Life of a Libertarian Paradise And that was a businessman with a MUCH better business track record than Trump. We are talking about a man who lost money owning a freaking gambling casino.

G.) He behaves unethically and always has. As a businessman, he constantly left in his wake unpaid contractors and invoices, litigation, broken promises, whatever he could get away with.

H.) He is damaging our relationships with our best international friends while kissing up to nations that do not have our best interests in mind. To his question “Wouldn't it be great to have better relations with Russia?” The answer is Yes. But it is RUSSIA who needs to earn that, who must stop doing the things that are damaging to that relationship, or we are simply weaker for it.

I.) He has never seen a shortcut he didn't like, and you can’t take shortcuts in government. “Nuclear Option, Remove the Filibuster, I’ll change the Constitution by Executive Order…Don…what happens when you remove the filibuster and the other side retakes the majority in the Senate? Suddenly want that filibuster back? What happens if you manage to change the Constitution by Executive Order and an Anti-2A President wins the next election?

J.) He behaves and has always behaved as an unabashed racist. Yes, I’ve seen your favorite meme that claims he was never accused of racism before the Democrats…Absolutely false. Donald Trump’s long history of racism, from the 1970s to 2019 See the Central Park 5, the lawsuits and fines resulting from his refusal to lease to black tenants, the 1992 lost appeal trying to overturn penalties for removing black dealers from tables, his remarks to the house native American affairs subcommittee in 1993. The man sees and treats racial groups of people as monoliths.

K.) He is systematically steamrolling regulations specifically designed to keep a disaster like the 2007 subprime mortgage crisis from happening again.

L.) He speaks and acts like a demagogue. He sees the Legislative and Judicial branches of government as inconveniences, blows up at criticism no matter how deserved and actively tries to countermand constitutional processes, not to mention attempts to blackmail and coerce people who are saying negative things about him

M.) His choices for top positions, with the exception of Gen. Mattis, who is a gem, have been horrendous. A secretary of Education without a resume that would get her hired as a small town grammar school principal, A secretary of Energy who didn't know the Department of Energy was responsible for nuclear reserves, an EPA head whose biggest accomplishments to date had been suing the EPA on multiple occasions, an FCC head who while working for Verizon actively lobbied to kill net neutrality, and an Attorney General who thinks pot is “nearly as bad as heroin” and asked Congress for permission to go after legal pot businesses in states where it is legal. (There goes that great Republican States rights rally cry again, right? *Crickets*) An Interim AG after Firing his First AG who’s appointment is probably unconstitutional.

N.) He denies scientific fact. Ever notice that the only people you hear denying climate change are politicians and lobbyists? 99% of actual scientists studying the issue agree in 97% of peer reviewed published papers that it’s real, man-made and caused by greenhouse gasses. Ever notice that every big disaster movie starts with a bunch of politicians in a room ignoring a scientist's warning?

0.) He does not have the temperament to lead this nation. He is Thin Skinned, childish, and a bully, never mind misogynistic, boorish, rude, and incapable of civil discourse.

P.) He still does not understand that the words he speaks, or tweets, are the official position of 1/3 of the US government, and so does not govern his words. He still thinks when he speaks it’s good ol’ Donald Trump. It’s not. It’s the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. You have probably spread a meme or two around talking about how no president’s every word has ever been dissected before…YES, THEY ALWAYS HAVE. It’s just that every other president in our lifetime has understood the importance of his words and took great care to govern his speech. Trump blurts out whatever comes to his mind then complains when people talk about what a dumb thing that was to say.

Q.) He’s unqualified. If you owned a small business and were looking for someone to manage it, and an unnamed resume came across your desk and you saw 6 bankruptcies, showing a man who had failed to make money running CASINOS, would you hire him? He is a very poor businessman. This is a man who it has been estimated would have been worth $10 BILLION more if he’d just taken what his father had given him, invested it in Index Funds and left it alone.

R.) He is President. But he refuses to take a leadership position and understand that he is everyone’s President. Conservatives complain about liberals chanting “Not my President”, while Trump himself behaves as if no one but his supporters matter.

S.) He’s a blatant hypocrite. He spent 8 years bitching Obama out for his family trips, or golfing, or any time he took for himself, and what does he do? He was already on his 20th golf outing in APRIL of his 1st year in office. He constantly rants about respect for the military, yet can’t be bothered to attend the 100th anniversary of Armistice Day because of a little rain. (And that excuse about Marine One not being able to fly in the rain is HILARIOUS.)

main-qimg-e95d21c94e9a2d263357ee208097dd84

I could go on, but I’m risking Carpal Tunnel, and I’m not sure how much longer I’ll have health insurance.

Edit:

Ok, Ok. Based on the most common feedback in the comments (Including the offer of a Marriage Proposal - - my wife was not amused) I’ll see what I can do about T-Z

T.) He’s a misogynist. It's not really ok in this day and age to be a misogynist, but it’s not a huge deal if you’re a private citizen. It’s a pretty big deal if you hate half the people you’re elected to lead. The disdain for women seeps out of his …whatever…. and he just can’t hide it.

U.) Face it. In any other election “Grab Em’ By the Pussy” would have been the end of that candidate’s chances. Back in the 90’s I used to marvel about how Teflon Bill Clinton was. I no longer do. The fact that he managed to slip by on that is as much a statement about how much people hate Hillary Clinton as it is about what is wrong with politics in this country right now.

V.) He has one response to a differing opinion. Attack. A good leader listens to criticism, to different points of view, is capable of self-reflection, tries to guide people to his point of view, and when necessary stands his ground and defends his convictions. Any of that sound like Trump? His default is not to Lead, it’s to attack. Scorched Earth. The Jim Acosta reaction is a good example. There was no defense of his convictions when Acosta was asking him repeated questions about his rhetoric on the caravan. His response was to attack Acosta.

W.) He takes credit for everything positive while deflecting blame for everything negative. Look at him with the Stock Market. He’s been bragging about it since day one, and to give credit where credit is due, speculation on coming deregulation early in his presidency did fuel some rapid growth, but to pretend that it’s all him, that we’re not in the 9th year of the longest bull market in history and THEN, when the standard market volatility that deregulation inevitably brings about starts to show up? Yeah. Look at yesterday. Hey! Stock Markets losing because the Democrats won! Do I need to bring out the Stock market chart for the last 10 Years again?

main-qimg-3d38ea83dadde3c2d2ea09ffcce2f636

X.) He emboldens the worst among us. Counter-protesters are slammed into by a car while countering actual Nazi rally, and the response is there’s fault on “Both Sides.” The media is at fault for a nut job sending them and Donald’s favorite targets pipe bombs. The truth is not all Republicans, not all Trump Supporters are racist, fascist lunatics. Many are just taken in by the bombastic personality and are living in an information bubble made worse by the fact that they unfollow anyone and ignore any source of information that makes them feel uncomfortable. People on the left do that too. The Biggest problem the right has right now is that the worst of the Right is the loudest and the most in your face, and the actual right, especially the Freaking PRESIDENT needs to be standing up and saying No. Those are not our values.

Y.) He seems to think the Constitution of The United States, the document that IS who we are, the document he took an oath to support and defend is some sort of inconvenience. He demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of Constitution, from believing he can alter the 14th through executive order, to thinking The free exercise clause in the first amendment somehow supersedes the establishment clause (not that he really understands either) or that the free exercise clause only applies to Christians. Or his attacks on freedom of expression and the press. He repeatedly makes it clear that if he’s read them, he does not understand Articles 1–3, and that’s something he really should have before he took the job, because they’re not going away.

Z.) I’ll use Z for something I do blame him for, but the rest of us have to carry the blame too. Polarization. This country is more politically polarized than I can remember in my lifetime. Some of you who are a few years older than me may remember how it was in the late 60’s when construction workers in New York were being applauded for beating up hippies. I think it’s pretty close to that right now, but that was before my time. And he is the cause of much of the current level polarization, but also the result. It didn't start with Trump. We’ve been going down this road I think since the eruption of the Tea Party in the early years of the Obama Administration. I do hope the tide turns before it gets much worse because the thing that scares me more than anything is what if that keeps going the way it has been?
 
I really wish all voters thought out their positions as well as you have before they cast their votes. You have a lot of premises in your rationale that I dispute (such as the polarization starting with the Tea Party and not before in the Clinton impeachment or the Bush lied People died eras or even in the Bork politicization of the SCOTUS confirmation), but how you got to where you are is worthy of respect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaShuckster
This Marine might have pTDS.

https://www.quora.com/Why-are-peopl...President-Donald-Trump/answer/Chris-OLeary-19

I’ll take a stab at this. Before you pass my answer off as “Another Liberal Snowflake” consider that 1.) I'm an independent centrist who has voted Republican way more often in my life than Democrat, and 2.) if you want to call someone who spent the entire decade of his 20’s serving in the Marine Corps a snowflake, I’d be ready to answer the question what did you do with your 20’s?

Why Liberals (And not-so liberals) are against President Trump.

A.) He lies. A LOT. Politifact rates 70% of the words he speaks as “Mostly False or worse” Only 14% of the things he says get a “Mostly True” or better rating. That is an absolutely unbelievable number. How he doesn’t speak more truth by mistake is beyond me. To put it in context, Obama’s rating was 26% mostly false or worse, and I had a problem with that. Many of Trump’s former business associates report that he has always been a compulsive liar, but now he’s the President of the United States, and that’s a problem. And this is a man who expects you to believe him when he points at other people and says “They’re lying.”

main-qimg-2344a43f8593a64eff36f2b5f1fac9b8

B.) He’s an authoritarian populist, not a conservative. He advances regressive social policy while proposing to expand federal spending and federalist authority over states, both of which conservatives are supposed to hate.

C.) He pretends at Christianity to court the Religious Right but fails to live anything resembling a Christ-Like Life.

D.) His nationalist “America First” message effectively alienates us and removes us from our place as leaders in the international community.

E.) His ideas on “Keeping us safe” are all thinly veiled ideas to remove our freedoms, he is, after all, an authoritarian first. They also are simply bad ideas.

F.) He couldn’t pass a 3rd-grade civics exam. He doesn't’ know what he’s doing. He doesn't understand how international relations work, he doesn’t understand how federal state or local governments work, and every time someone tries to “Run it like a business” it’s a spectacular failure. See Colorado Springs’ recent history as an example. The Short, Unhappy Life of a Libertarian Paradise And that was a businessman with a MUCH better business track record than Trump. We are talking about a man who lost money owning a freaking gambling casino.

G.) He behaves unethically and always has. As a businessman, he constantly left in his wake unpaid contractors and invoices, litigation, broken promises, whatever he could get away with.

H.) He is damaging our relationships with our best international friends while kissing up to nations that do not have our best interests in mind. To his question “Wouldn't it be great to have better relations with Russia?” The answer is Yes. But it is RUSSIA who needs to earn that, who must stop doing the things that are damaging to that relationship, or we are simply weaker for it.

I.) He has never seen a shortcut he didn't like, and you can’t take shortcuts in government. “Nuclear Option, Remove the Filibuster, I’ll change the Constitution by Executive Order…Don…what happens when you remove the filibuster and the other side retakes the majority in the Senate? Suddenly want that filibuster back? What happens if you manage to change the Constitution by Executive Order and an Anti-2A President wins the next election?

J.) He behaves and has always behaved as an unabashed racist. Yes, I’ve seen your favorite meme that claims he was never accused of racism before the Democrats…Absolutely false. Donald Trump’s long history of racism, from the 1970s to 2019 See the Central Park 5, the lawsuits and fines resulting from his refusal to lease to black tenants, the 1992 lost appeal trying to overturn penalties for removing black dealers from tables, his remarks to the house native American affairs subcommittee in 1993. The man sees and treats racial groups of people as monoliths.

K.) He is systematically steamrolling regulations specifically designed to keep a disaster like the 2007 subprime mortgage crisis from happening again.

L.) He speaks and acts like a demagogue. He sees the Legislative and Judicial branches of government as inconveniences, blows up at criticism no matter how deserved and actively tries to countermand constitutional processes, not to mention attempts to blackmail and coerce people who are saying negative things about him

M.) His choices for top positions, with the exception of Gen. Mattis, who is a gem, have been horrendous. A secretary of Education without a resume that would get her hired as a small town grammar school principal, A secretary of Energy who didn't know the Department of Energy was responsible for nuclear reserves, an EPA head whose biggest accomplishments to date had been suing the EPA on multiple occasions, an FCC head who while working for Verizon actively lobbied to kill net neutrality, and an Attorney General who thinks pot is “nearly as bad as heroin” and asked Congress for permission to go after legal pot businesses in states where it is legal. (There goes that great Republican States rights rally cry again, right? *Crickets*) An Interim AG after Firing his First AG who’s appointment is probably unconstitutional.

N.) He denies scientific fact. Ever notice that the only people you hear denying climate change are politicians and lobbyists? 99% of actual scientists studying the issue agree in 97% of peer reviewed published papers that it’s real, man-made and caused by greenhouse gasses. Ever notice that every big disaster movie starts with a bunch of politicians in a room ignoring a scientist's warning?

0.) He does not have the temperament to lead this nation. He is Thin Skinned, childish, and a bully, never mind misogynistic, boorish, rude, and incapable of civil discourse.

P.) He still does not understand that the words he speaks, or tweets, are the official position of 1/3 of the US government, and so does not govern his words. He still thinks when he speaks it’s good ol’ Donald Trump. It’s not. It’s the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. You have probably spread a meme or two around talking about how no president’s every word has ever been dissected before…YES, THEY ALWAYS HAVE. It’s just that every other president in our lifetime has understood the importance of his words and took great care to govern his speech. Trump blurts out whatever comes to his mind then complains when people talk about what a dumb thing that was to say.

Q.) He’s unqualified. If you owned a small business and were looking for someone to manage it, and an unnamed resume came across your desk and you saw 6 bankruptcies, showing a man who had failed to make money running CASINOS, would you hire him? He is a very poor businessman. This is a man who it has been estimated would have been worth $10 BILLION more if he’d just taken what his father had given him, invested it in Index Funds and left it alone.

R.) He is President. But he refuses to take a leadership position and understand that he is everyone’s President. Conservatives complain about liberals chanting “Not my President”, while Trump himself behaves as if no one but his supporters matter.

S.) He’s a blatant hypocrite. He spent 8 years bitching Obama out for his family trips, or golfing, or any time he took for himself, and what does he do? He was already on his 20th golf outing in APRIL of his 1st year in office. He constantly rants about respect for the military, yet can’t be bothered to attend the 100th anniversary of Armistice Day because of a little rain. (And that excuse about Marine One not being able to fly in the rain is HILARIOUS.)

main-qimg-e95d21c94e9a2d263357ee208097dd84

I could go on, but I’m risking Carpal Tunnel, and I’m not sure how much longer I’ll have health insurance.

Edit:

Ok, Ok. Based on the most common feedback in the comments (Including the offer of a Marriage Proposal - - my wife was not amused) I’ll see what I can do about T-Z

T.) He’s a misogynist. It's not really ok in this day and age to be a misogynist, but it’s not a huge deal if you’re a private citizen. It’s a pretty big deal if you hate half the people you’re elected to lead. The disdain for women seeps out of his …whatever…. and he just can’t hide it.

U.) Face it. In any other election “Grab Em’ By the Pussy” would have been the end of that candidate’s chances. Back in the 90’s I used to marvel about how Teflon Bill Clinton was. I no longer do. The fact that he managed to slip by on that is as much a statement about how much people hate Hillary Clinton as it is about what is wrong with politics in this country right now.

V.) He has one response to a differing opinion. Attack. A good leader listens to criticism, to different points of view, is capable of self-reflection, tries to guide people to his point of view, and when necessary stands his ground and defends his convictions. Any of that sound like Trump? His default is not to Lead, it’s to attack. Scorched Earth. The Jim Acosta reaction is a good example. There was no defense of his convictions when Acosta was asking him repeated questions about his rhetoric on the caravan. His response was to attack Acosta.

W.) He takes credit for everything positive while deflecting blame for everything negative. Look at him with the Stock Market. He’s been bragging about it since day one, and to give credit where credit is due, speculation on coming deregulation early in his presidency did fuel some rapid growth, but to pretend that it’s all him, that we’re not in the 9th year of the longest bull market in history and THEN, when the standard market volatility that deregulation inevitably brings about starts to show up? Yeah. Look at yesterday. Hey! Stock Markets losing because the Democrats won! Do I need to bring out the Stock market chart for the last 10 Years again?

main-qimg-3d38ea83dadde3c2d2ea09ffcce2f636

X.) He emboldens the worst among us. Counter-protesters are slammed into by a car while countering actual Nazi rally, and the response is there’s fault on “Both Sides.” The media is at fault for a nut job sending them and Donald’s favorite targets pipe bombs. The truth is not all Republicans, not all Trump Supporters are racist, fascist lunatics. Many are just taken in by the bombastic personality and are living in an information bubble made worse by the fact that they unfollow anyone and ignore any source of information that makes them feel uncomfortable. People on the left do that too. The Biggest problem the right has right now is that the worst of the Right is the loudest and the most in your face, and the actual right, especially the Freaking PRESIDENT needs to be standing up and saying No. Those are not our values.

Y.) He seems to think the Constitution of The United States, the document that IS who we are, the document he took an oath to support and defend is some sort of inconvenience. He demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of Constitution, from believing he can alter the 14th through executive order, to thinking The free exercise clause in the first amendment somehow supersedes the establishment clause (not that he really understands either) or that the free exercise clause only applies to Christians. Or his attacks on freedom of expression and the press. He repeatedly makes it clear that if he’s read them, he does not understand Articles 1–3, and that’s something he really should have before he took the job, because they’re not going away.

Z.) I’ll use Z for something I do blame him for, but the rest of us have to carry the blame too. Polarization. This country is more politically polarized than I can remember in my lifetime. Some of you who are a few years older than me may remember how it was in the late 60’s when construction workers in New York were being applauded for beating up hippies. I think it’s pretty close to that right now, but that was before my time. And he is the cause of much of the current level polarization, but also the result. It didn't start with Trump. We’ve been going down this road I think since the eruption of the Tea Party in the early years of the Obama Administration. I do hope the tide turns before it gets much worse because the thing that scares me more than anything is what if that keeps going the way it has been?
Yawn
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
Forgot record low employment, booming economy, and maybe a trade deal with China that never would have happened without him. If we stop the TDS he is done more than any modern president.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
I stopped about a third of the way through. You provided too many claims/opinions with out evidence. For example, G) give me legit evidence. Some story of people reporting he did this is not evidence. This is why a lot of people support Trump, most of the opposition is just feelings/opinions/unverifiable and not facts and hard evidence.

If his opposition actually reported fairly and honestly about him, I'm positive his support would fall. But his opposition keeps falling into this emotional trap of not using sharp facts and evidence.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: UCFWayne
I stopped about a third of the way through. You provided too many claims/opinions with out evidence. For example, G) give me legit evidence. Some story of people reporting he did this is not evidence. This is why a lot of people support Trump, most of the opposition is just feelings/opinions/unverifiable and not facts and hard evidence.

If his opposition actually reported fairly and honestly about him, I'm positive his support would fall. But his opposition keeps falling into this emotional trap of not using sharp facts and evidence.

No, you purposefully ignore the literal mountains of evidence about him because it doesn't agree with your preconceived beliefs

Just this week he was fined $2 million by a court of law for stealing from his charity.
 
No, you purposefully ignore the literal mountains of evidence about him because it doesn't agree with your preconceived beliefs

Just this week he was fined $2 million by a court of law for stealing from his charity.

Wrong, I said I stopped reading because of lack of evidence. Provide me the evidence and don't fabricate lies about me, otherwise, you're no better than what you think Trump is
 
I stopped about a third of the way through. You provided too many claims/opinions with out evidence. For example, G) give me legit evidence. Some story of people reporting he did this is not evidence. This is why a lot of people support Trump, most of the opposition is just feelings/opinions/unverifiable and not facts and hard evidence.

If his opposition actually reported fairly and honestly about him, I'm positive his support would fall. But his opposition keeps falling into this emotional trap of not using sharp facts and evidence.

Use google, there are tons of claims. Hell guy won’t pay for the police security at his rallies.

Since you asked:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/theweek.com/articles-amp/783976/brief-history-trumps-smalltime-swindles
 
Wrong, I said I stopped reading because of lack of evidence. Provide me the evidence and don't fabricate lies about me, otherwise, you're no better than what you think Trump is

Are you utterly incapable of doing the most basic of research? Or did you purposefully ignore my evidence of Trump being found guilty in an impartial court of law for stealing from a charity?


This is why it's pointless to argue with MAGAts, if they were capable of being influenced by facts and reality they wouldn't be MAGAts in the first place. It's a catch 22.
 
Use google, there are tons of claims. Hell guy won’t pay for the police security at his rallies.

Since you asked:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/theweek.com/articles-amp/783976/brief-history-trumps-smalltime-swindles

Thanks, yes of course I can use Google, but people should support their claims. Imagine if research never had a reference section, that's part of my point.

So I looked at your link and read the first 2 references...If you read them carefully, they describe someone's apparent problem with their business with Trump. The main point I'm making is, just because somebody claims something doesn't mean it's true. Just because people who he's done business with him say they have a problem, doesn't mean it's true. My point is that we should believe strong evidence, not something someone says. Those 2 sources were opinion pieces and are being processed in the courts. You can try and sue anyone, that means 0 about actual guilt.

Imagine if I post everything Trump says as true. Wouldn't you want to know the source? Wouldn't you want to know the evidence? Wouldn't you want to know the oppositions point of view if it were a legal dispute and know the evidence? We should hold the same standards to everyone
 
Are you utterly incapable of doing the most basic of research? Or did you purposefully ignore my evidence of Trump being found guilty in an impartial court of law for stealing from a charity?

That's why it's pointless to argue with MAGAts, if they were capable of being influenced by facts and reality they wouldn't be MAGAts in the first place. It's a catch 22.

No I'm not.You making the claim, you should provide the evidence. Should I believe any sentence Trump makes or should we ask for evidence? Do you not know anything about research or the judicial system? I don't see a link and you still haven't provided one. So in your own words, maybe you are utterly incapable of providing evidence?
 
I stopped about a third of the way through. You provided too many claims/opinions with out evidence. For example, G) give me legit evidence. Some story of people reporting he did this is not evidence. This is why a lot of people support Trump, most of the opposition is just feelings/opinions/unverifiable and not facts and hard evidence.

If his opposition actually reported fairly and honestly about him, I'm positive his support would fall. But his opposition keeps falling into this emotional trap of not using sharp facts and evidence.
https://www.npr.org/2019/11/07/7772...pay-2-million-over-misuse-of-foundation-funds
 
  • Like
Reactions: NinjaKnight
Thanks for the references, all I was asking for, quite simple eh?
 
I watched a televised Congressional town hall meeting where a vocal group of attendees were loudly booing their representative's vote to impeach. When asked by a reporter after the town hall what these MAGA hatters thought of the impeachment inquiry testimonies, they responded that they didn't pay attention to any of it because the whole thing is a hoax.

That says it all.
 
This Marine might have pTDS.

https://www.quora.com/Why-are-peopl...President-Donald-Trump/answer/Chris-OLeary-19

I’ll take a stab at this. Before you pass my answer off as “Another Liberal Snowflake” consider that 1.) I'm an independent centrist who has voted Republican way more often in my life than Democrat, and 2.) if you want to call someone who spent the entire decade of his 20’s serving in the Marine Corps a snowflake, I’d be ready to answer the question what did you do with your 20’s?

Why Liberals (And not-so liberals) are against President Trump.

A.) He lies. A LOT. Politifact rates 70% of the words he speaks as “Mostly False or worse” Only 14% of the things he says get a “Mostly True” or better rating. That is an absolutely unbelievable number. How he doesn’t speak more truth by mistake is beyond me. To put it in context, Obama’s rating was 26% mostly false or worse, and I had a problem with that. Many of Trump’s former business associates report that he has always been a compulsive liar, but now he’s the President of the United States, and that’s a problem. And this is a man who expects you to believe him when he points at other people and says “They’re lying.”

main-qimg-2344a43f8593a64eff36f2b5f1fac9b8

B.) He’s an authoritarian populist, not a conservative. He advances regressive social policy while proposing to expand federal spending and federalist authority over states, both of which conservatives are supposed to hate.

C.) He pretends at Christianity to court the Religious Right but fails to live anything resembling a Christ-Like Life.

D.) His nationalist “America First” message effectively alienates us and removes us from our place as leaders in the international community.

E.) His ideas on “Keeping us safe” are all thinly veiled ideas to remove our freedoms, he is, after all, an authoritarian first. They also are simply bad ideas.

F.) He couldn’t pass a 3rd-grade civics exam. He doesn't’ know what he’s doing. He doesn't understand how international relations work, he doesn’t understand how federal state or local governments work, and every time someone tries to “Run it like a business” it’s a spectacular failure. See Colorado Springs’ recent history as an example. The Short, Unhappy Life of a Libertarian Paradise And that was a businessman with a MUCH better business track record than Trump. We are talking about a man who lost money owning a freaking gambling casino.

G.) He behaves unethically and always has. As a businessman, he constantly left in his wake unpaid contractors and invoices, litigation, broken promises, whatever he could get away with.

H.) He is damaging our relationships with our best international friends while kissing up to nations that do not have our best interests in mind. To his question “Wouldn't it be great to have better relations with Russia?” The answer is Yes. But it is RUSSIA who needs to earn that, who must stop doing the things that are damaging to that relationship, or we are simply weaker for it.

I.) He has never seen a shortcut he didn't like, and you can’t take shortcuts in government. “Nuclear Option, Remove the Filibuster, I’ll change the Constitution by Executive Order…Don…what happens when you remove the filibuster and the other side retakes the majority in the Senate? Suddenly want that filibuster back? What happens if you manage to change the Constitution by Executive Order and an Anti-2A President wins the next election?

J.) He behaves and has always behaved as an unabashed racist. Yes, I’ve seen your favorite meme that claims he was never accused of racism before the Democrats…Absolutely false. Donald Trump’s long history of racism, from the 1970s to 2019 See the Central Park 5, the lawsuits and fines resulting from his refusal to lease to black tenants, the 1992 lost appeal trying to overturn penalties for removing black dealers from tables, his remarks to the house native American affairs subcommittee in 1993. The man sees and treats racial groups of people as monoliths.

K.) He is systematically steamrolling regulations specifically designed to keep a disaster like the 2007 subprime mortgage crisis from happening again.

L.) He speaks and acts like a demagogue. He sees the Legislative and Judicial branches of government as inconveniences, blows up at criticism no matter how deserved and actively tries to countermand constitutional processes, not to mention attempts to blackmail and coerce people who are saying negative things about him

M.) His choices for top positions, with the exception of Gen. Mattis, who is a gem, have been horrendous. A secretary of Education without a resume that would get her hired as a small town grammar school principal, A secretary of Energy who didn't know the Department of Energy was responsible for nuclear reserves, an EPA head whose biggest accomplishments to date had been suing the EPA on multiple occasions, an FCC head who while working for Verizon actively lobbied to kill net neutrality, and an Attorney General who thinks pot is “nearly as bad as heroin” and asked Congress for permission to go after legal pot businesses in states where it is legal. (There goes that great Republican States rights rally cry again, right? *Crickets*) An Interim AG after Firing his First AG who’s appointment is probably unconstitutional.

N.) He denies scientific fact. Ever notice that the only people you hear denying climate change are politicians and lobbyists? 99% of actual scientists studying the issue agree in 97% of peer reviewed published papers that it’s real, man-made and caused by greenhouse gasses. Ever notice that every big disaster movie starts with a bunch of politicians in a room ignoring a scientist's warning?

0.) He does not have the temperament to lead this nation. He is Thin Skinned, childish, and a bully, never mind misogynistic, boorish, rude, and incapable of civil discourse.

P.) He still does not understand that the words he speaks, or tweets, are the official position of 1/3 of the US government, and so does not govern his words. He still thinks when he speaks it’s good ol’ Donald Trump. It’s not. It’s the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. You have probably spread a meme or two around talking about how no president’s every word has ever been dissected before…YES, THEY ALWAYS HAVE. It’s just that every other president in our lifetime has understood the importance of his words and took great care to govern his speech. Trump blurts out whatever comes to his mind then complains when people talk about what a dumb thing that was to say.

Q.) He’s unqualified. If you owned a small business and were looking for someone to manage it, and an unnamed resume came across your desk and you saw 6 bankruptcies, showing a man who had failed to make money running CASINOS, would you hire him? He is a very poor businessman. This is a man who it has been estimated would have been worth $10 BILLION more if he’d just taken what his father had given him, invested it in Index Funds and left it alone.

R.) He is President. But he refuses to take a leadership position and understand that he is everyone’s President. Conservatives complain about liberals chanting “Not my President”, while Trump himself behaves as if no one but his supporters matter.

S.) He’s a blatant hypocrite. He spent 8 years bitching Obama out for his family trips, or golfing, or any time he took for himself, and what does he do? He was already on his 20th golf outing in APRIL of his 1st year in office. He constantly rants about respect for the military, yet can’t be bothered to attend the 100th anniversary of Armistice Day because of a little rain. (And that excuse about Marine One not being able to fly in the rain is HILARIOUS.)

main-qimg-e95d21c94e9a2d263357ee208097dd84

I could go on, but I’m risking Carpal Tunnel, and I’m not sure how much longer I’ll have health insurance.

Edit:

Ok, Ok. Based on the most common feedback in the comments (Including the offer of a Marriage Proposal - - my wife was not amused) I’ll see what I can do about T-Z

T.) He’s a misogynist. It's not really ok in this day and age to be a misogynist, but it’s not a huge deal if you’re a private citizen. It’s a pretty big deal if you hate half the people you’re elected to lead. The disdain for women seeps out of his …whatever…. and he just can’t hide it.

U.) Face it. In any other election “Grab Em’ By the Pussy” would have been the end of that candidate’s chances. Back in the 90’s I used to marvel about how Teflon Bill Clinton was. I no longer do. The fact that he managed to slip by on that is as much a statement about how much people hate Hillary Clinton as it is about what is wrong with politics in this country right now.

V.) He has one response to a differing opinion. Attack. A good leader listens to criticism, to different points of view, is capable of self-reflection, tries to guide people to his point of view, and when necessary stands his ground and defends his convictions. Any of that sound like Trump? His default is not to Lead, it’s to attack. Scorched Earth. The Jim Acosta reaction is a good example. There was no defense of his convictions when Acosta was asking him repeated questions about his rhetoric on the caravan. His response was to attack Acosta.

W.) He takes credit for everything positive while deflecting blame for everything negative. Look at him with the Stock Market. He’s been bragging about it since day one, and to give credit where credit is due, speculation on coming deregulation early in his presidency did fuel some rapid growth, but to pretend that it’s all him, that we’re not in the 9th year of the longest bull market in history and THEN, when the standard market volatility that deregulation inevitably brings about starts to show up? Yeah. Look at yesterday. Hey! Stock Markets losing because the Democrats won! Do I need to bring out the Stock market chart for the last 10 Years again?

main-qimg-3d38ea83dadde3c2d2ea09ffcce2f636

X.) He emboldens the worst among us. Counter-protesters are slammed into by a car while countering actual Nazi rally, and the response is there’s fault on “Both Sides.” The media is at fault for a nut job sending them and Donald’s favorite targets pipe bombs. The truth is not all Republicans, not all Trump Supporters are racist, fascist lunatics. Many are just taken in by the bombastic personality and are living in an information bubble made worse by the fact that they unfollow anyone and ignore any source of information that makes them feel uncomfortable. People on the left do that too. The Biggest problem the right has right now is that the worst of the Right is the loudest and the most in your face, and the actual right, especially the Freaking PRESIDENT needs to be standing up and saying No. Those are not our values.

Y.) He seems to think the Constitution of The United States, the document that IS who we are, the document he took an oath to support and defend is some sort of inconvenience. He demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of Constitution, from believing he can alter the 14th through executive order, to thinking The free exercise clause in the first amendment somehow supersedes the establishment clause (not that he really understands either) or that the free exercise clause only applies to Christians. Or his attacks on freedom of expression and the press. He repeatedly makes it clear that if he’s read them, he does not understand Articles 1–3, and that’s something he really should have before he took the job, because they’re not going away.

Z.) I’ll use Z for something I do blame him for, but the rest of us have to carry the blame too. Polarization. This country is more politically polarized than I can remember in my lifetime. Some of you who are a few years older than me may remember how it was in the late 60’s when construction workers in New York were being applauded for beating up hippies. I think it’s pretty close to that right now, but that was before my time. And he is the cause of much of the current level polarization, but also the result. It didn't start with Trump. We’ve been going down this road I think since the eruption of the Tea Party in the early years of the Obama Administration. I do hope the tide turns before it gets much worse because the thing that scares me more than anything is what if that keeps going the way it has been?
First this person is not a moderate of even close to it. Many of the points are pure liberal talking points.

politifact is 100% biased and have Ben proven to be.

Yes he is a populist but who determines what policies are regressive?

No president lives a Christ like life, who would want one? Kennedy called himself a Catholic but lived far from its morals.

His America first agenda is exactly what was needed. America does not need to be the worlds policeman. What’s wrong with his stance?

The posters “E” stance is pure laughable, what rights is he taking away? If anything, he is giving or protecting individual rights.

F. Once again this person is coming from a pure liberal stance. Give me a businessman over a socialist anyway and that is what democrats are today.

G. Once again a typical ignorant view, I would ask the writer if he has ever had to deal with sub contractors and lien releases, I’m guessing not.

H. When he says friends does he mean our friends like France who works behind America’s backs with Iran? Our friends Germany who undermined our relationship and buys energy from Russia. Which friends?

I. Someone tell this moron who removed the filibuster.

J. Really, the Central Park 5? That proves racism? Another liberal talking point.

K. Would like specifics on what Trump has done to dismantle the protection to stop another subprime disaster.

L. It wasn’t Trump that just rolled over the constitution, the dems just impeached Trump and neither article had high crimes or misdemeanors.

M. Who is the poster to question the credentials of top staff. Where was he when Obama appointed his staff:
Tim Geithner Treasury Secretary who didn’t pay taxes for years.
Eric Holder who called Obama “my boy” while he was AG. Imagine if Barr said that of Trump.
Labor Secretary Hilda Solis who never held a non governmental job.

N. Another liberal talking point, many more than 1% deny climate change and even more don’t believe its man made.

O. May have a point here but what have other personalities accomplished?

P. Probably correct but most of America doesn’t speak like Washington anyway.

Q. Spoken like a true moron who has neither built a business, run a business or has a clue how business works.

R. Remember “clinging to their guns and bibles?” My representative doesn’t represent my values, my mayor does not and from 2008-2016, neither did my President.

S. Once again, if this is all this liberal has he has nothing. Comparing Obama’s respect to Trumps is about as asinine as it gets.

T. More baseless BS

U. Same as “U.”

V. Laughable, all he does is gets attacked, 90% of the time they are baseless and personal.

W. Idiot said everything but “it’s Obama’s economy.” His deregulation is still working, his tax breaks worked as will his trade stance.

X. Repeating liberal lies, the entire comment about the Charlottesville was taken out of context.

Y. He attacks the media because they have become the lefts PR firm. It’s laughable to hear this liberal complain about anyone attacking free speech.

Z.
 
First this person is not a moderate of even close to it. Many of the points are pure liberal talking points.

politifact is 100% biased and have Ben proven to be.

Yes he is a populist but who determines what policies are regressive?

No president lives a Christ like life, who would want one? Kennedy called himself a Catholic but lived far from its morals.

His America first agenda is exactly what was needed. America does not need to be the worlds policeman. What’s wrong with his stance?

The posters “E” stance is pure laughable, what rights is he taking away? If anything, he is giving or protecting individual rights.

F. Once again this person is coming from a pure liberal stance. Give me a businessman over a socialist anyway and that is what democrats are today.

G. Once again a typical ignorant view, I would ask the writer if he has ever had to deal with sub contractors and lien releases, I’m guessing not.

H. When he says friends does he mean our friends like France who works behind America’s backs with Iran? Our friends Germany who undermined our relationship and buys energy from Russia. Which friends?

I. Someone tell this moron who removed the filibuster.

J. Really, the Central Park 5? That proves racism? Another liberal talking point.

K. Would like specifics on what Trump has done to dismantle the protection to stop another subprime disaster.

L. It wasn’t Trump that just rolled over the constitution, the dems just impeached Trump and neither article had high crimes or misdemeanors.

M. Who is the poster to question the credentials of top staff. Where was he when Obama appointed his staff:
Tim Geithner Treasury Secretary who didn’t pay taxes for years.
Eric Holder who called Obama “my boy” while he was AG. Imagine if Barr said that of Trump.
Labor Secretary Hilda Solis who never held a non governmental job.

N. Another liberal talking point, many more than 1% deny climate change and even more don’t believe its man made.

O. May have a point here but what have other personalities accomplished?

P. Probably correct but most of America doesn’t speak like Washington anyway.

Q. Spoken like a true moron who has neither built a business, run a business or has a clue how business works.

R. Remember “clinging to their guns and bibles?” My representative doesn’t represent my values, my mayor does not and from 2008-2016, neither did my President.

S. Once again, if this is all this liberal has he has nothing. Comparing Obama’s respect to Trumps is about as asinine as it gets.

T. More baseless BS

U. Same as “U.”

V. Laughable, all he does is gets attacked, 90% of the time they are baseless and personal.

W. Idiot said everything but “it’s Obama’s economy.” His deregulation is still working, his tax breaks worked as will his trade stance.

X. Repeating liberal lies, the entire comment about the Charlottesville was taken out of context.

Y. He attacks the media because they have become the lefts PR firm. It’s laughable to hear this liberal complain about anyone attacking free speech.

Z.
Shoot, I've been using politifact and I didn't know they were biased. Can you provide me the name of an unbiased fact checking site? Any single one that I can use from now on. Thanks in advance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NinjaKnight
Once again this person is coming from a pure liberal stance. Give me a businessman over a socialist anyway and that is what democrats are today.
What exactly would you call Trump's $16 billion bailout to farmers last July?

Inquiring minds want to know, Comrade Galahad.
 
Shoot, I've been using politifact and I didn't know they were biased. Can you provide me the name of an unbiased fact checking site? Any single one that I can use from now on. Thanks in advance.
Oh no @Sir Galahad, I fear its worse than I thought. I have looked at several fact checking sites and they all say the same thing: Trump lies all the time.

I think it may be the facts themselves that are biased against Trump. Facts are often used by liberals to attack our president and I think the facts have been out to get him from day one. Whats more likely: that all these fact checking sites are equally biased? Or, that the facts they are checking are biased? Could our own intelligence community be releasing these biased facts? Would they stoop so low? If so it adds some validity that the deep state is indeed active and more dangerous than ever.

Where can you go when even the facts are biased against your own personal reality preferences? This is a dark time for America.
 
I think it may be the facts themselves that are biased against Trump. Facts are often used by liberals to attack our president and I think the facts have been out to get him from day one.
You nailed it, FC. [thumb2] Those pesky facts have had it in for Trump from the very start.

It began when the facts disputed Trump's assertion that his inauguration crowd was bigger than Obama's. It's been downhill ever since.
 
Oh no @Sir Galahad
Where can you go when even the facts are biased against your own personal reality preferences? This is a dark time for America.

So this is something that I've given thought to that is really troubling for me. Do I believe the majority of mainstream media is "fair and balanced"? No. I think America's mistrust is the media is fair and I think it's more than fair to criticize it.

But I also think it's fuking terrifying that we are now at a point where we legitimately can't agree on facts. You can't possibly have a productive discussion there.
 
So this is something that I've given thought to that is really troubling for me. Do I believe the majority of mainstream media is "fair and balanced"? No. I think America's mistrust is the media is fair and I think it's more than fair to criticize it.

But I also think it's fuking terrifying that we are now at a point where we legitimately can't agree on facts. You can't possibly have a productive discussion there.

You really think we are giving "facts"? Look how many Trump facts have been proven totally bogus.
 
So this is something that I've given thought to that is really troubling for me. Do I believe the majority of mainstream media is "fair and balanced"? No. I think America's mistrust is the media is fair and I think it's more than fair to criticize it.

But I also think it's fuking terrifying that we are now at a point where we legitimately can't agree on facts. You can't possibly have a productive discussion there.

Bingo. I'm a bigger defender of the mainstream press today than I was 3 years ago, precisely because that's where reasonable people need to be right now, not because they are unbiased saints. If you prefer self rule, when POTUS says the MSM is the enemy of the people, you defend the press. This is like Liberty 101 here.

I'm flabbergasted at how fast disinformation has completely changed everything. History books are going to write how unprepared democracy was for this age. Hope it has a good ending.
 
Remember all the women that accused Trump of sexual harassment? Some of them admitted to lying because of the "current climate".

It feels like there was once a certain baseline where people could walk in to a conversation already having certain things understood and you could go from there. Everyone was working the same algebraic expression but there was reasonable disagreement around the coefficients.... or at least something LIKE that.

Now most of the time is spent between groups operating in fundamentally different realities. I'm making no commentary on assignment of blame, just stating what seems to be obvious to a lot of people.

Edit: We're seriously at a place where textbook definitions of words no longer apply. How do you move from that place? You gonna blame/shame the other side to death? Perhaps remove them from society?
 
Last edited:
It feels like there was once a certain baseline where people could walk in to a conversation already having certain things understood and you could go from there. Everyone was working the same algebraic expression but there was reasonable disagreement around the coefficients.... or at least something LIKE that.

Now most of the time is spent between groups operating in fundamentally different realities. I'm making no commentary on assignment of blame, just stating what seems to be obvious to a lot of people.

Here's my theory. The United States lives on one end of the spectrum for the free flow information, thanks to the 1st Amendment, how the nation was founded, etc. We set the standard here. A place like North Korea lives on the opposite end, where the government controls and censors everything. China lives closer to the middle. A great deal of things are censored from the masses, but China is far from closed off from the world like N. Korea.

As information flows more freely (internet and social media), it makes it very hard for a place like N. Korea. They have to remain completely unplugged from the world in order to maintain the level of control the government exerts. China has a well oiled censorship machine, more than capable of shutting down internal dissent or external information campaigns, while remaining generally plugged in. Contrast that to us. We are 100% plugged in with ZERO infrastructure in place to deal with organized disinformation campaigns from foreign or domestic actors. More than lacking the legal or technical ability to deal with it, arguments are being made that the 1st Amendment protects these actions.

Allowing the 1st Amendment to apply to disinformation (as Facebook is doing), is like allowing the 2nd Amendment to apply to Nuclear Arms. I don't know what the answer is, but I suspect this period is going to have it's own name in the history books, just like the Cold War. The Age of Disinformation or something...
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChrisKnight06
Up to 15,000+ false or misleading statements. You have to be really special in the head to still support Trump in Dec of 2019, or you just like being lied to.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...as-made-false-or-misleading-claims-over-days/

Amen brother. Not only that but

Racist
Fukn inbred
Stupid
Homophobic (though I suspect him of homosexuality myself)
Transphobic (his comments toward Michelle Obama are unforgivable)
Islamophobic (his comments toward the entire Obama family are disgusting)
 
Here's my theory. The United States lives on one end of the spectrum for the free flow information, thanks to the 1st Amendment, how the nation was founded, etc. We set the standard here. A place like North Korea lives on the opposite end, where the government controls and censors everything. China lives closer to the middle. A great deal of things are censored from the masses, but China is far from closed off from the world like N. Korea.

As information flows more freely (internet and social media), it makes it very hard for a place like N. Korea. They have to remain completely unplugged from the world in order to maintain the level of control the government exerts. China has a well oiled censorship machine, more than capable of shutting down internal dissent or external information campaigns, while remaining generally plugged in. Contrast that to us. We are 100% plugged in with ZERO infrastructure in place to deal with organized disinformation campaigns from foreign or domestic actors. More than lacking the legal or technical ability to deal with it, arguments are being made that the 1st Amendment protects these actions.

Allowing the 1st Amendment to apply to disinformation (as Facebook is doing), is like allowing the 2nd Amendment to apply to Nuclear Arms. I don't know what the answer is, but I suspect this period is going to have it's own name in the history books, just like the Cold War. The Age of Disinformation or something...

That's pretty hyperbolic. You can't compare someone spreading a lie on facebook with someone using a nuclear weapon any more than you can compare me telling my kids that Santa claus is real with owning an Uzi.
Here's a thought: dont have a government that people already distrust. Then we dont have to worry about conspiracy theories and lies. The only reason people believe these untrue stories is because the government has given us ample reason to think they may be true. And quite honestly, other than the "Hillary is running a child prostitution ring out of a pizza parlor" and "there's video of trump getting pissed on by a russian hooker", most of the stuff that's been propagated actually has a sliver of truth to it at the very least.
 
ADVERTISEMENT